Rights, Regulation and Bureaucratic Impact: The Impact of Human Rights Litigation on the Regulation of Informal Trade in Johannesburg

Marius Pieterse

Abstract


In contemplating the extent to which rights-based litigation is conducive to positive social change, attention ought to be paid to the bureaucratic impact of court judgments that vindicate rights against the State. As a case study of such impact, this article considers the effects of human rights litigation on the regulation of informal trade in the City of Johannesburg, where a 2013 attempt by local government to clamp down on informal trade in the central business district (CBD) led to high-profile court action. After describing and problematising the City's general approach to managing informal trade, the article focuses on "Operation Clean Sweep", which aimed to rid much of the CBD of informal traders and became the focal point of rights-based resistance. It then briefly describes the constitutional and jurisprudential framework within which the legal challenge to "Operation Clean Sweep" was to be decided, before critically discussing the judgment of the Constitutional Court in South African Informal Traders Forum v City of Johannesburg 2014 4 SA 371 (CC), which effectively halted "Operation Clean Sweep" by interdicting the City from removing traders from their places of business. The article then proceeds to consider the aftermath of the judgment, and assesses its impact on the City's informal trade policy and urban management practices, as well as on the broader regulatory and political environment around street trade in South African cities. The article shows that the bureaucratic impact of the judgment has, at best, been mixed, and that the judgment has not been entirely successful in disrupting the legal and bureaucratic mindsets, frameworks and processes that simultaneously create, exacerbate and unsuccessfully attempt to address the "unmanageability" of street trade in Johannesburg.


Keywords


adjudication; rights-based litigation; bureaucratic impact; urban governance; regulation; informal trade

Full Text:

PDF

References


BIBLIOGRAPHY

Literature

Benit-Gbaffou C (ed) A Political Landscape of Street Trader Organisations in Inner City Johannesburg, Post Operation Clean Sweep (CUBES Johannesburg 2014)

Beyleveld A Regulating Informal Trade in Johannesburg: The Intersection between the Freedom of Trade and Socio-economic Rights (LLM Research Report, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2015)

Canon BC “Studying Bureaucratic Implementation of Judicial Policies in the United States: Conceptual and Methodological Approaches” in Hertogh M and & Halliday S (eds) Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact: International and Interdisciplinary Perspectives (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2004) 76-100

Dinath Y “Between Fixity and Flux: Grappling with Transience and Permanence in the Inner City” in Harrison P et al (eds) Changing Space, Changing City: Johannesburg After Apartheid (Wits University Press Johannesburg 2014) 232-251

Dixon R “Creating Dialogue about Socio-economic rights: Strong-form versus Weak-form Judicial Review Revisited” 2007 (5) International Journal of Constitutional Law 391-418

Fuller LL “The Forms and Limits of Adjudication” 1978 (92) Harvard LR 353-409

Gloppen S “Social Rights Litigation as Transformation: South African Perspectives” in Jones P and Stokke K (eds) Democratizing Development: The Politics of Socio-economic Rights in South Africa (Martinus Nijhoff Leiden 2005) 153-180

Heywood M “Preventing Mother-to-child HIV Transmission in South Africa: Background, Strategies and Outcomes of the Treatment Action Campaign Case against the Minister of Health” 2003 (19) SAJHR 278-315

Liebenberg S Socio-economic Rights: Adjudication Under a Transformative Constitution (Juta Cape Town 2010)

Makhetha P and Rubin M “Inner-city Street Traders: Legality and Spatial Practice” in Harrison P et al (eds) Changing Space, Changing City: Johannesburg After Apartheid (Wits University Press Johannesburg 2014) 532-538

McLean K Constitutional Deference, Courts and Socio-Economic Rights in South Africa (PULP Pretoria 2009)

Murray MJ Taming the Disorderly City: The Spatial Landscape of Johannesburg After Apartheid (Cornell University Press Ithaca/London 2008)

Murray MJ City of Extremes: The Spatial Politics of Johannesburg (Duke University Press Durham/London 2011)

Pieterse E and Van Donk M “Incomplete Ruptures: The Political Economy of Realising Socio-economic Rights in South Africa” 2002 (6) Law, Democracy & Development 193-229

Pieterse M “Coming to Terms with Judicial Enforcement of Socio-economic Rights 2004 (20) SAJHR 383-417

Pieterse M Can Rights Cure? The Impact of Human Rights Litigation on South Africa’s Health System (PULP Pretoria 2014)

Pieterse M “The Right to the City and the Urban Environment: Re-imagining Section 24 of the 1996 Constitution” 2014 (29) SA Public Law 175-193.

Rosenberg GN The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? (2ed Chicago University Press Chicago 2008)

Skinner C “Getting Institutions Right? Local Government and Street Traders in Four South African Cities” 2000 (11) Urban Forum 49-71

Sunkin M “Conceptual Issues in Researching the Impact of Judicial Review on Government Bureaucracies” in Hertogh M and & Halliday S (eds) Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact: International and Interdisciplinary Perspectives (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2004) 43-75

Tissington K The Business of Survival: Informal Trading in Inner City Johannesburg (CALS Research Report Johannesburg 2009)

Van Rooyen EJ and Malan LP “Informal Trading in the City of Johannesburg: Suggestions to Create an Enabling Environment” 2007 (42) Journal of Public Administration 707-720

Case law

Makwicana v eThekwini Municipality 2015 (3) SA 165 (KZD)

South African Informal Traders Forum et al v City of Johannesburg (GJ) unreported case number 43427/13 of 27 November 2013

South African Informal Traders Forum et al v City of Johannesburg 2014 (4) SA 371 (CC)

Minister of Health v Treatment Action Campaign 2002 (5) SA 721 (CC)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2017/v20i0a1294

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Marius Pieterse

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.