Perceived weaknesses of post-graduates in a group supervision setup: lived experiences of a small sample of South African students.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/1edbey54Keywords:
Computer Science Education, Group Supervision Interventions, Group Supervision Weaknesses, Post-graduate Lived Experiences, Post-graduate SupervisionAbstract
Although research supervision presents various challenges, it is crucial for student success, particularly at the post-graduate level. The aim of this study was twofold. First, we identified the weaknesses of group supervision from the contemporary literature through the lens of SWOT analysis, Tuckman’s stages of group development, and Proctor’s supervision model. Second, we used insight into these weaknesses to devise improved strategies for instructors to supervise post-graduate computer science students. We followed an integrated methodological approach where data were collected through individual semi-structured interviews, supplemented by informal observations made during supervision activities. Thematic analysis was employed to analyse the collected data and 10 key weaknesses of group supervision were identified. The study makes two key contributions. The first contribution is methodological in nature ─ sharing and discussing the supervision intervention that was implemented during this study. The second contribution relates to the weaknesses of group supervision that are relevant not only in generic research supervision but also in supervising technical research projects.
References
Bacwayo, K. E., Nampala, P. & Oteyo, I. N. (2017). Challenges and Opportunities Associated with Supervising Graduate Students Enrolled in African Universities. International Journal of Education..and..Practice,..5(3),..29-39. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61/2017.5.3/61.3.29.39 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61/2017.5.3/61.3.29.39
Bernard, J. M. & Goodyear, R. K. (2019). Fundamentals of clinical supervision. Pearson.
Blomberg, K., Isaksson, A.-K., Allvin, R., Bisholt, B., Ewertsson, M., Kullén Engström, A., Ohlsson, U., Sundler Johansson, A. & Gustafsson, M. (2016). Work stress among newly graduated nurses in relation to workplace and clinical group supervision. Journal of Nursing Management, 24(1), 80-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12274
Borders, L. D., Welfare, L. E., Greason, P. B., Paladino, D. A., Mobley, A. K., Villalba, J. A. & Borders, K. L. W. (2012). Individual and Triadic and group? Supervisors’ and supervisees’ perceptions of each modality. Counselor Education and Supervision, 51(4), 281-285. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2012.00021.x
Buttery, E. A., Richter, E. M. & Filho, W. (2005). An overview of the elements that influence efficiency in postgraduate supervisory practice arrangements. International Journal of Educational Management, 19(1), 7-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540510574920
Clutterbuck, D., Whitaker, C. & Lucas, M. (2016). Coaching Supervision. A Practical Guide for Supervisees. Routledge. Oxon. United Kingdom. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687070
Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications. United States of America.
Enyedy, K. C., Arcinue, F., Puri, N. N., Carter, J. W., Goodyear, R. K. & Getzelman, M. A. (2003). Hindering phenomena in group supervision: Implications for practice. In Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 34(3), 312-317. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.34.3.312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.34.3.312
Ferreira, J. T. (2021). Reflecting on the viability of Twitter as tool in the postgraduate supervision process. Frontiers in Education, 6, 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.705451
Grassby, S. & Gonsalvez, C. (2022). Group supervision is a distinct supervisor competency: empirical evidence and a brief scale for supervisory practice. Australian Psychologist, 57(6), 352-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2022.2107890 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2022.2107890
Hawkins, P. & McMahon, A. (2020). Supervision in the Helping Professions: Vol. 769.08 cc (5th ed.). McGraw Hill. Open University Press. Berkshire, UK.
Kálmán, O., Horváth, L., Kardos, D., Kozma, B., Feyisa, M. B. & Rónay, Z. (2022). Review of benefits and challenges of co-supervision in doctoral education. European Journal of Education, 57(3), 452-468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12518
Kettle, M. (2015). Achieving effective supervision - Evidence summaries to support social services in Scotland. www.iriss.org.uk
Lawrence, P. (2019). What happens in group supervision? Exploring current practice in Australia. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 17(2), 138-157. https://doi.org/10.24384/v0d6-2380
Linton, J. M. (2005). Group Supervision: A Review of Practices and Models in Training. Michigan Journal of Counseling: Research, Theory, and Practice, 33(1), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.22237/mijoc/1122854520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22237/mijoc/1122854520
Mahlangu, V. P. (2021). Exploring Challenges of Supervising Postgraduate Students in Open Distance Learning in Higher Education Settings. New Challenges to Education: Lessons from Around the World BCES Conference Books, 19. Sofia: Bulgarian Comparative Education Society.
McPherson, C., Punch, S. & Graham, E. (2017). Transitions from undergraduate to taught postgraduate study: Emotion, integration and ambiguity. Journal of Perspective in Applied Academic Practice, 5(2), 42-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v5i2.265
Mhlahlo, A. (2020). Reflecting on supervision experiences: Honours students’ research projects in development studies at the Nelson Mandela University. South African Journal of Higher Education, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.20853/34-2-3565 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20853/34-2-3565
Naidoo, v. (2023). Students experiences with postgraduate research cohort supervision. Alternation Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of the Arts and Humanities in Southern Africa, 41.https://doi.org/10.29086/2519-5476/2023/sp41a03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29086/2519-5476/2023/sp41a03
O’Neil, S. M., Schurink, W. & Stanz, K. (2016). The benefits of using small supervisor-initiated groups to supervise master’s research. South African Journal of Higher Education, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.20853/30-4-613 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20853/30-4-613
Parcell, E. S. & Rafferty, K. A. (2017). Interviews, Recording and Transcribing. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483381411.n275 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483381411.n275
Plowright, D. (2011). Using mixed methods: Frameworks for an integrated methodology. Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526485090
Proctor, B. (2008). Group Supervision: A Guide to Creative Practice (B. Proctor, Ed.; 2nd ed.). Sage. New York, United States of America. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221259
Proctor, B. & Inskipp, F. (2001). Group supervision’ in Scaife, J. Supervision in the Mental Health Professions: A Practitioner’s Guide. Routledge. London, United Kingdom.
Repper, J., Liz Walker, Syena Skinner & Mel Ball. (2022). Preparing Organisations for Peer Support: Creating a Culture and Context in which peer support workers thrive. Preparing Organisations for Peer Support. ImROC Briefing paper 17, Centre for Mental Health and Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham.
Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2024). Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson. Harlow, United Kingdom.