Konstitusionele voorskrifte rakende regspersone

Authors

  • Gerrit Pienaar North West University(Potchefstroom Campus)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/1998/v1i1a2901

Abstract

The interim Constitution of 1993 and the final Constitution of 1996 contain specific provisions applicable to juristic persons. Juristic persons are also entitled to the fundamental rights contained in the Bill of Rights to the extent that these rights are applicable to them. It must be kept in mind that juristic persons have peculiar characteristics and that the fundamental rights of juristic persons differ from those of natural persons. 

Juristic persons are also under the obligation to respect the fundamental rights of natural persons and other juristic persons to the extent provided for in the Bill of Rights. In the case of juristic persons acting as organs of state the vertical application of the Bill of Rights safeguards the fundamental rights of persons against state action or interference. The circumstances where juristic persons act as organs of state are discussed with reference to case law. Difference of opinion exists regarding the horizontal application of the Bill of Rights, that is the application of the Bill of Rights to private law relationships. In terms of the interim Constitution the Bill of Rights was applied horizontally in an indirect manner. Section 35(3) provided that the common and customary law must be developed by both the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court to promote the values underlying an open and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom, without completely abolishing the common and customary law. 

The final Constitution provides in section 8(2) that natural and juristic persons in private law relationships are also bound by the Bill of Rights if, and to the extent that, such rights are applicable, taking into account the nature of the rights and the nature of any duty imposed by such right. The direct horizontal application of the Bill of Rights is, however, limited by section 36. The extent of the rights of juristic persons and limitations on them in private law relationships are investigated, taking into account the right of freedom of association in terms of section 18. The various

principles to be taken into consideration in the case of clubs, religious organisations, educational institutions, political organisations and trading and professional institutions are discussed. 

      ScienceOpen_Log0536.png

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

BIBLIOGRAFlE

Boeke, versamelwerke en tydskrifartikels

Basson en Viljoen 1988

Basson D en Viljoen H Die Suid-Afrikaanse Staatsreg (Kaapstad 1988)

Basson 1994

Basson D South Africa's interim Constitution: text and notes (Kaapstad 1994)

Baxter 1984

Baxter L Administrative law (Kaapstad 1984)

Cachalia ea 1994

Cachalia A, Cheadle H, Davis D, Haysom N, Maduna P en Marcus G Fundamental rights in the new constitution (Kaapstad 1994)

Carpenter & Botha 1996

Carpenter G en Botha C "The 'constitutional attack on private law': are the fears well founded?" 1996 THRHR 126-135

Chaskalson ea 1996

Chaskalson M, Kentridge J, Klaaren J, Marcus G, Spitz D en Woolman S Constitutional law of South Africa (Kaapstad 1996)

Colloton 1986

Colloton M "The attack on single-sex college social organizations" 1986 Yale Law and Policy Review 426-445

Davis 1994

Davis DM "Equality and equal protection" in Van Wyk D ea (reds) Rights and constitutionalism: the new South African legal order (Kaapstad 1994)

Davis 1996

Davis DM "The underlying theory that informs the wording of our Bill of Rights" 1996 SALJ 113 385-394

Domanski 1996

Domanski A "Teaching Roman law on the eve of the millenium: a new beginning" 1996 THRHR 539-556

Du Plessis 1994

Du Plessis LM "The genesis of the provisions concerned with the application and

interpretation of the chapter on fundamental rights in South Africa's transitional constitution" 1994 TSAR 706-733

Du Plessis & Corder 1994

Du Plessis LM en Corder H Understanding South Africa's transitional Bill of Rights (Kaapstad 1994)

Du Plessis 1995

Du Plessis LM "Enkele gedagtes oor die historiese interpretasie van hoofstuk 3 van die Oorgangsgrondwet" 1995 THRHR 504-513

Du Plessis 1996

Du Plessis LM "Of the new constitution: an evaluation of aspects of a constitutional text sui generis" 1996 Stell LR 3-24

Ferreira 1990

Ferreira GM "Enkele gedagtes oor die onderskeid tussen publiek- en privaatreg in die SuidAfrikaanse reg" 1990 SA Publiekreg 50-65

Ferreira 1991

Ferreira GM "Die nakoming van die audi alteram partem-reël in kontraktuele verhoudinge" 1991 SA Publiekreg 140-146 Ferriera & Robinson 1997 Ferreira GM en Robinson JA

"Reflections on the boni mores in the light of chapter 3 of the 1993 Constitution" 1997 THRHR 303-310

Finlay 1990

Finlay P "Prying open the the clubhouse door" 1990 Washington University Law Quarterly 381-397

Henderson 1995

Henderson A "Operation of the constitution between private actors: inevitable consequences of section 35(3) and the dilemma of conflicting rights" 1995 De Rebus 439-441

Neethling & Potgieter 1995

Neethling J en Potgieter JM "Aspekte van die lasterreg in die lig van die Grondwet: Gardener v Whitaker" 1995 THRHR 709-715

Neethling, Potgieter & Visser 1996

Neethling J, Potgieter JM & Visser PJ Deliktereg 3de uitg (Durban 1996)

Pienaar 1982

Pienaar GJ Die gemeenregtelike regspersoon in die Suid-Afrikaanse privaatreg 1982 Proefskrif PU vir CHO Potchefstroom

Pienaar 1993

Pienaar GJ "Freedom of association in South Africa and the United States" 1993 CILSA 147171

Pienaar 1994

Pienaar GJ "Regspersone: fiksie of feit?" 1994 THRHR 92-98

Rautenbach 1995

Rautenbach IM General provisions of the South African Bill of Rights (Durban 1995)

Van Aswegen 1995

Van Aswegen A "The implication for the Bill of Rights for the law of contract and delict" 1995 SAJHR 50-69

Van Der Vyver 1994

Van der Vyver JD "The private sphere in constitutional litigation" 1994 THRHR 378-395

Van Der Vyver 1995

Van der Vyver 1995 "Constitutional free speech and the law of defamation" 1995 SALJ 572-602

Van Der Walt 1996

Van der Walt JGW "Justice Kriegler's disconcerting judgment in Du Plessis v De Klerk: much ado about direct horizontal application (read nothing)" 1996 TSAR 732-741

Venter 1995

Venter F "Die staat en die universiteitswese in Suid-Afrika: nuwe wedersydse grondwetlike verantwoordelikhede, regte en verpligtinge" 1995 THRHR 379-395

Visser 1995

Visser PJ "A successful constitutional invasion of private law" 1995 THRHR 745-750

Visser 1996

Visser PJ "Horisontaliteit van fundamentele regte afgewys" 1996 THRHR 510514

Wiechers 1984 Wiechers M Administratiefreg (Durban 1984)

Woolman & De Waal 1994

Woolman S en De Waal J "Freedom of association: the right to be we" in Van Wyk D ea (reds) Rights and constitutionalism: the new South African legal order (Kaapstad 1994)

Woolman 1996

Woolman S "Application" in Chaskalson M ea (reds) Constitutional law of South Africa (Kaapstad 1996)

Woolman 1996

Woolman S "Defamation, application, and the interim Constitution" 1996 SALJ 428-454

Zaal 1996

Zaal FN "Roman law and the racial policies of the Dutch East India Company: an exploration of some historical inter-connections" 1996 CILSA 31-48

Wetgewing

Bankwet 94 van 1990

Eskomwet 40 van 1987

Wet op Fondsinsameling 107 van 1978

Grondwet van die Republiek van Suid-Afrika 200 van 1993

Grondwet van die Republiek van Suid-Afrika 108 van 1996

Maatskappywet 61 van 1973

Wet op die Potchefstroomse Universiteit vir Christelike Hoër Onderwys 80 van 1993 Hofbeslissings

Baloro v University of Bophuthatswana 1995 4 SA (BA)

Bernstein and Others v Bester NO and Others 1996 2 SA 751 (KH)

Brink v Kitshoff NO 1996 4 SA 197 (KH)

Committee of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange v Chairman Stock Exchange Appeal Board 1992 2 SA 30 (W)

De Klerk and Another v Du Plessis and Others 1995 2 SA 40 (T)

Directory Advertising Cost Cutters v Minister for Posts, Telecommunication and Broadcasting 1996 3 SA 800 (T)

Du Plessis v De Klerk 1996 3 SA 850 (KH)

Durr v Universiteit van Stellenbosch 1990 3 SA 598 (A)

Fose v Minister of Safety and Security 1996 2 SA BCLR 232 (W)

Gardener v Whitaker 1995 2 SA 672 (OK)

Gardener v Whitaker 1996 4 SA 337 (KH)

Holomisa v Argus Newspapers 1996 2 SA 588 (W)

Jeeva v Receiver of Revenue, Port Elizabeth 1995 2 SA 423 (SOK)

Jurgens v Editor, Sunday Times Newspaper 1995 2 SA 52 (W)

Kalla v The Master 1995 2 SA 261 (T)

K Entertainment CC v Minister of Safety and Security 1994 2 BCLR 718 (OK)

Mandela v Falati 1995 1 SA 251 (W)

Matukane v Laerskool Potgietersrus 1996 1 SACLR 468 (T)

Mfolo v Minister of Education, Bophuthatswana 1994 BCLR 136 (B)

Motala v University of Natal 1995 3 SA BCLR 374 (N)

Potgieter v Kilian 1996 2 SA 276 (N)

Regering van die RSA v SANTAM Versekeringsmaatskappy 1964 1 SA 546 (W)

Rivett-Carnac v Wiggens 1997 3 SA 80 (K)

Robinson v Randfontein Estates 1925 AD 204

Rock Insurance Co Ltd v Carmichael's Executor 1917 AD 598

S v Makwanyane 1995 BCLR 665 (KH)

Theron v Ring van Wellington NG Sendingkerk in SA 1976 2 SA 1 (A)

Waltons Stationary Company (Pty) Ltd 1994 1 BCLR 507 (O)

Yates v University of Bophuthatswana 1964 3 SA 815 (BA)

Published

10-07-2017

How to Cite

Pienaar, G. (2017). Konstitusionele voorskrifte rakende regspersone. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 1(1), 166–204. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/1998/v1i1a2901

Issue

Section

Articles