Disposing of Bodies, Semantically: Notes on the Meaning of "Disposal" in S v Molefe

Keywords: Attempt, concealment of birth, disposal, dispose of, disposed, looking, ordinary meaning, seeing, space in language, uncompleted attempt


In S v Molefe the presiding officer determines the meaning of the word "disposal" at the hand of two criteria, namely (1) visibility and (2) permanence; this means a body has to be permanently out of sight to be considered disposed of. He applies these two criteria in order to conclude if the accused is guilty of concealing the birth of her child by disposing of its body. In doing so, the court no longer interprets the word as an everyday word but turns it into a legal term. This note questions the linguistic soundness of the criteria by investigating how language structures space, and how these constructions relate to the word "disposal". In order to scrutinise the criteria, a text analysis was carried out by applying Talmy's ideas surrounding prepositions in structuring space and movement. Connected to this is the semantic difference between the words "seeing" and "looking": seeing is a sensory act, whereas looking is a cognitive one. In keeping with the contested word's status as a legal term, the difference between seeing and looking aids in formulating two new criteria. Courts may consider assessing whether disposal took place on the grounds of (a) containment and (b) movement; for instance, has the body been moved from one location to another and is the body being contained within another object like a bucket, a wooden box or a suitcase?


Google_Scholar50.png  ScienceOpen_Log03431048.png




Blackwell 2009 Comparative Legilinguistics
Blackwell S "Why Forensic Linguistics Needs Corpus Linguistics" 2009 Comparative Legilinguistics 5-19

Burchell Principles of Criminal Law
Burchell J Principles of Criminal Law 4th ed (Juta Claremont 2013)

Carney and Bergh 2014 LitNet Akademies
Carney TR and Bergh L "?n Taalkundige Perspektief op Woordeboekgebruik in die Hof: Die Hof as Toevlugsoord" 2014 LitNet Akademies (Regte) 23-64

Cotterill "How to Use Corpus Linguistics"
Cotterill J "How to Use Corpus Linguistics in Forensic Linguistics" in O'Keeffe A and McCarthy M (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics (Routledge New York 2012) 578-590

Cowen 1980 THRHR
Cowen DV "The Interpretation of Statutes and the Concept of 'the Intention of the Legislature'" 1980 THRHR 374-399

Devenish Interpretation of Statutes
Devenish GE Interpretation of Statutes (Butterworths Durban 1996)

Dictionary Unit for SAE South African Concise Oxford Dictionary
Dictionary Unit for South African English The South African Concise Oxford Dictionary (Oxford University Press Cape Town 2007)

Du Plessis Re-interpretation of Statutes
Du Plessis L Re-interpretation of Statutes (Butterworths Durban 2002)

Feist "Inside In and On"
Feist MI "Inside In and On: Typological and Psycholinguistic Perspectives" in Evans V and Chilton P (eds) Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions (Equinox London 2010) 95-114

Hutton Word Meaning
Hutton C Word Meaning and Legal Interpretation (Palgrave Macmillan London 2014)

Labuschagne 1988 SAPR
Labuschagne JMT "Die Woord as Kommunikasiebasis in die Wetgewingsproses" 1988 SAPR 34-45
Labuschagne 1989 SAPR
Labuschagne JMT "Regsnormvorming: Riglyn vir 'n Nuwe Benadering tot die Tradisionele Reëls van Wetuitleg" 1989 SAPR 205-212

Labuschagne 1998 SAPR
Labuschagne JMT "Gewone Betekenis van ?n Woord, Woordeboeke en die Organiese Aard van Wetsuitleg" 1998 SAPR 145-148

Mouritsen 2010 BYULR
Mouritsen SC "The Dictionary is not a Fortress: Definitional Fallacies and a Corpus-based Approach to Plain Meaning" 2010 BYULR 1915-1980

Mouritsen 2011 CSTLR
Mouritsen SC "Hard Cases and Hard Data: Assessing Corpus Linguistics as an Empirical Path to Plain Meaning" 2011 CSTLR 156-205

Odendal and Gouws Handwoordeboek
Odendal FF and Gouws RH Handwoordeboek van die Afrikaanse Taal (Pearson Kaapstad 2010)

Slocum Ordinary Meaning
Slocum B Ordinary Meaning: A Theory of the Most Fundamental Principle of Legal Interpretation (Chicago University Press Chicago 2016)

Snyman Strafreg
Snyman CR Strafreg 4th ed (Butterworths Durban 1999)

Solan 2016 YLJF
Solan L "Can Corpus Linguistics Help Make Originalism Scientific?" 2016 YLJF 57-64
Solan and Gales 2016 IJLD
Solan LM and Gales T "Finding Ordinary Meaning in Law: The Judge, the Dictionary or the Corpus?" 2016 IJLD 253-276

Talmy "How Language Structures Space"
Talmy L "How Language Structures Space" in Pick H and Acredolo L (eds) Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research and Application (Plenum Press New York 1983) 225-282

Talmy Towards a Cognitive Semantics
Talmy L Towards a Cognitive Semantics. Volume 1: Concept Structuring Systems (MIT Press Cambridge, Mass 2000)

Vandeloise "Are there Spatial Prepositions?"
Vandeloise "Are there Spatial Prepositions?" in Hickman M and Robert S (eds) Space in Language: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories (John Benjamins Amsterdam 2006) 139-154

Woolls 2003 Forensic Linguistics
Woolls D "Better Tools for the Trade and How to Use Them" 2003 Forensic Linguistics 102-112

Case law

South Africa

R v Dema 1947 1 SA 599 (E)

R v Smith 1918 CPD 260

S v Cele 1991 1 SACR 627 (A)

S v Kleynhans 1994 1 SACR 195 (O)

S v M 1998 1 SACR 47 (O)

S v Mamba 1990 1 SACR 277 (A)

S v Mofokeng 1992 2 SACR 710 (A)

S v Molefe 2012 2 SACR 574 (GNP)

S v Mooi 1990 1 SACR 592 (A)

S v Nair 1993 1 SACR 451 (A)

S v Roberts 2000 2 SACR 522 (SCA)

S v Schoombie 1945 AD 541

S v Scott-Crossley 2008 1 SACR 223 (SCA)

S v Shabalala 1991 2 SACR 478 (A)

S v Terblanche 2011 1 SACR 77 (ECG)

Venter v R 1907 TS 1910

United States of America

People v Harris (72 Ill 2nd 16377 NE 2nd 28, 1978 Ill 17 Ill Dec 838)

State v Rasabout (2015 UT 72, 356 P 3rd 1258)

United States v Costello (666 F 3rd 1040 (2012))

General Law Amendment Act 46 of 1935

Interpretation Act 33 of 1957

Internet sources
Brigham Young University 2017 https://corpus.byu.edu/coca/
Brigham Young University 2017 Disposal https://corpus.byu.edu/coca/ accessed 8 September 2017
Lee and Mouritsen 2017 https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/08/11/the-path-forward-for-law-and-corpus-linguistics/?tid=ss_mail&utm_term=.e4f45b62d59f
Lee T and Mouritsen S 2017 The Path Forward for Law and Corpus Linguistics https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/08/11/the-path-forward-for-law-and-corpus-linguistics/?tid=ss_mail&utm_term=.e4f45b62d59f accessed 8 January 2018
Oxford University Press 2017 http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/12765?rskey=B8ZBhz&result=1#eid
Oxford University Press 2017 Attempt http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/12765?rskey=B8ZBhz&result=1#eid accessed 25 October 2017
Vogel, Hamann and Gauer 2017 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/lsi.12305
Vogel F, Hamann H and Gauer I "Computer-assisted Legal Linguistics: Corpus Analysis as a New Tool for Legal Studies" 2017 L&SI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/lsi.12305 accessed 7 May 2018


BYULR Brigham Young University Law Review

COCA Corpus of Contemporary American English

CSTLR Columbia Science and Technology Law Review

IJLD International Journal of Legal Discourse

L&SI Law and Social Inquiry

SAPR Suid-Afrikaanse Publiekreg

THRHR Tydskrif vir Hedendaagse Romeins-Hollandse Reg

YLJF Yale Law Journal Forum
How to Cite
Carney, T. R. (2018). Disposing of Bodies, Semantically: Notes on the Meaning of "Disposal" in S v Molefe. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 21, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a4220
Case Notes