An Analysis of the Regulatory Environment Governing Hearsay Electronic Evidence in South Africa: Suggestions for Reform – Part Two

  • Lee Swales University of KwaZulu-Natal
Keywords: Electronic evidence; data messages; ECT Act; law of evidence; South African Law Reform Commission; technology and law

Abstract

The purpose of this two-part article is to examine the regulatory environment governing hearsay electronic evidence in South Africa with a view to suggesting law reform in the light of the most recent proposals put forward by the South African Law Reform Commission.

Part one considered the definition of data messages in the context of hearsay electronic evidence and concluded that amendment is required (as suggested by the South African Law Reform Commission). Further, part one sought to answer two additional queries posed in Discussion Paper 131 Review of the Law of Evidence in relation to electronic hearsay, ultimately finding that a data message can constitute hearsay within the meaning of the applicable legislation; further, that South African law must distinguish between data messages produced substantially by a computer or mechanical process and those that rely substantially on the credibility of a person.

Part two of this article will review the statutory exceptions to the hearsay rules applicable to electronic evidence, including the controversial section 15(4) of the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 25 of 2002. Further, part two will analyse the situation in selected foreign jurisdictions where hearsay electronic evidence has had more time to mature and develop (United Kingdom, Canada and United States) with a view to incorporating suggestions that South Africa can implement.

Finally, this article will conclude by providing suggestions for law reform in the context of the recommendations put forward by the South African Law Reform Commission, and will suggest that that there must be law reform in at least the following areas: the definition of data messages; the definition of the term document in the statutes applicable to the hearsay exceptions; a distinction between types of electronic evidence insofar as computer-generated evidence with human intervention, and without human intervention is concerned; and more cohesion and alignment with the statutory hearsay exceptions.

Author Biography

Lee Swales, University of KwaZulu-Natal

Lecturer at University of kwaZulu-Natal.

Practicing attorney at Thomson Wilks Inc.

References

Bibliography

Literature

Bellengere et al Law of Evidence
Bellengere A et al The Law of Evidence in South Africa (Oxford University Press Cape Town 2013)

Bilchitz "Law of Evidence"
Bilchitz D "Law of Evidence" in Lewis C et al (eds) Annual Survey of South African Law (Juta Johannesburg 1998) 735-821

Boyd Canadian Law
Boyd N Canadian Law: An Introduction 5th ed (Nelson Education Toronto 2011)

De Villiers 2010 TSAR
De Villiers DS "Old 'Documents', 'Videotapes' and New 'Data Messages' – A Functional Approach to the Law of Evidence (part 2)" 2010 TSAR 720-734

Duvenhage Evidential Analysis
Duvenhage A An Evidential Analysis of Section 15(4) of the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 25 of 2002 (LLM-dissertation University of Pretoria 2016)

Esler 2007 DEESLR
Esler BW " Lorraine v Markel: Unnecessarily Raising the Standard for Admissibility of Electronic Evidence" 2007 DEESLR 80-82

Fourie Using Social Media as Evidence
Fourie PF Using Social Media as Evidence in South African Courts (LLM-dissertation North-West University 2016)

Frieden and Murray 2011 Rich J L & Tech
Frieden JD and Murray LM "The Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under the Federal Rules of Evidence" 2011 Rich J L & Tech 1-39

Friedman and Hayden American Law
Friedman LM and Hayden GM American Law: An Introduction (Oxford University Press New York 2017)

Gallavin and Mason "Hearsay"
Gallavin C and Mason S "Hearsay" in Mason S and Seng D (eds) Electronic Evidence 4th ed (Institute of Advanced Legal Studies London 2017) 70-87

Hofman 2006 SACJ
Hofman J "Electronic Evidence in Criminal Cases" 2006 SACJ 257-275

Hofman and De Jager "South Africa"
Hofman J and De Jager J "South Africa" in Mason S (ed) Electronic Evidence 3rd ed (LexisNexis Butterworths London 2012) 761-797

Kemp 2012 NC JOLT
Kemp LJ "Lorraine v. Markel: An Authoritative Opinion Sets the Bar for Admissibility of Electronic Evidence (Except for Computer Animations and Simulations)" 2012 NC JOLT 16-30

Leroux 2004 IRLCT
Leroux O "Legal Admissibility of Electronic Evidence" 2004 IRLCT 193-220

Mason, Freedman and Patel "England and Wales"
Mason S, Freedman C and Patel S "England and Wales" in Mason S (ed) Electronic Evidence 3rd ed (LexisNexis
Butterworths London 2012) 327-474

Paciocco and Stuesser Law of Evidence
Paciocco D and Stuesser L The Law of Evidence 7th ed (Irwin Law Toronto 2015)

Papadopoulos and Snail Cyberlaw@SA III
Papadopoulos S and Snail S (eds) Cyberlaw@SA III: The Law of the Internet in South Africa 3rd ed (Van Schaik Pretoria 2012)

Reed "Admissibility and Authentication of Computer Evidence"
Reed C "The Admissibility and Authentication of Computer Evidence – A Confusion of Issues" in 5th Annual British and Irish Legal Education Technology Association Conference (1990) 1-9

SALRC Discussion Paper 131
South African Law Reform Commission Discussion Paper 131, Project 126 - Review of the Law of Evidence (SALRC Pretoria 2014)

SALRC Issue Paper 27
South African Law Reform Commission Issue Paper 27, Project 126 – Review of the Law of Evidence: Electronic Evidence in Criminal and Civil Proceedings: Admissibility and Related Issues (SALRC Pretoria 2010)

Schwerha, Bagby and Esler "United States of America"
Schwerha JJ, Bagby JW and Esler BW "United States of America" in Mason S (ed) Electronic Evidence 3rd ed (LexisNexis Butterworths London 2012) 797-835

Schwikkard and Van der Merwe Principles of Evidence 3rd ed
Schwikkard PJ and Van der Merwe SE Principles of Evidence 3rd ed (Juta Cape Town 2009)

Schwikkard and Van der Merwe Principles of Evidence 4th ed
Schwikkard PJ and Van der Merwe SE Principles of Evidence 4th ed (Juta Cape Town 2016)

Smith 1983 Crim L R
Smith JC "The Admissibility of Statements by Computer" 1983 Crim L R 389-391

Swales 2018 PELJ
Swales L "An Analysis of the Regulatory Environment Governing Hearsay Electronic Evidence in South Africa: Suggestions for Reform – Part One" 2018 PELJ https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a2916.

Tapper Cross and Tapper on Evidence
Tapper C Cross and Tapper on Evidence 12th ed (Oxford University Press London 2010)

Theophilopoulos 2015 TSAR
Theophilopoulos C "The Admissibility of Data, Data Messages, and Electronic Documents at Trial" 2015 TSAR 461-481

Underwood and Penner Electronic Evidence
Underwood GJ and Penner J Electronic Evidence in Canada (Carswell Toronto 2010)

Van der Merwe et al Information and Communications Technology Law
Van der Merwe D et al Information and Communications Technology Law 2nd ed (LexisNexis Durban 2016)

Watney 2009 JILT
Watney M "Admissibility of Electronic Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: An Outline of the South African Legal Position" 2009 JILT 1-13

Zeffertt and Paizes South African Law of Evidence
Zeffertt DT and Paizes AP The South African Law of Evidence 2nd ed (LexisNexis Durban 2009)

Case law

England
Castle v Cross [1985] 1 All ER 87
McDonald v R [2011] EWCA Crim 2933
R (on the application of O) v Coventry Justices [2004] All ER (D) 78
R v Spiby [1990] 91 Cr App R 186

Canada
R v Hall [1998] BCJ 2515
R v McCulloch [1992] BCJ 2282
R v Mondor 2014 ONCJ 135
Saturley v CIBC World Markets Inc 2012 NSSC 226

South Africa
Absa Bank Ltd v Le Roux 2014 1 SA 475 (WCC)
CMC Woodworking Machinery (Pty) Ltd v Pieter Odendaal Kitchens 2012 5 SA 604 (KZD)
Director of Public Prosecution v Modise 2012 1 SACR 553 (GSJ)
Ex parte Rosche 1998 1 All SA 319 (W)
Firstrand Bank Limited v Venter 2012 JOL 29436 (SCA)
Golden Fried Chicken (Proprietary) Limited v Yum Restaurants International (Proprietary) Limited 2005 ZAGPHC 311 (22 August 2005)
Haupt t/a Softcopy v Brewers Marketing Intelligence (Pty) Ltd 2006 4 SA 458 (SCA)
Heroldt v Wills 2013 2 SA 530 (GSJ)
La Consortium & Vending CC t/a LA Enterprises v MTN Service Provider (Pty) Ltd In re: MTN Service Provider (Pty) Ltd v La Consortium & Vending CC t/a La Enterprises 2011 4 SA 577 (GSJ)
Narlis v South African Bank of Athens 1976 2 SA 573 (A)
Ndlovu v Minister of Correctional Services 2006 4 All SA 165 (W)
S v Brown 2015 ZAWCHC 128 (17 August 2015)
S v Ndiki 2007 2 All SA 185 (Ck)
S v Van der Linde 2016 3 All SA 898 (GJ)
Sublime Technologies (Pty) Ltd v Jonker 2010 2 SA 522 (SCA)
Trend Finance (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service 2005 4 All SA 657 (C)

United States of America
Lorraine v Markel American Insurance Company 241 FRD 534
Telewizja Polska USA Inc v Echostar Satellite Corp 2004 WL 2367740
U-Haul Intern Inc. v Lumbermens 576 F 3d 1040 (9th Cir 2009)
United States v Hamilton 413 F 3d 1138, 1142 (10th Cir 2005)
United States v Khorozian 333 F 3d 498, 506 (3d Cir 2003)
United States v Lamons 532 F 3d 1251, 1263 (11th Cir 2008)
United States v Lizarraga-Tirado 2015 WL 3772772 (9th Cir 2015)
United States v Moon 512 F 3d 359, 362 (7th Cir 2008)
United States v Rollins 2004 WL 26780
United States v Washington 498 F 3d 225, 230 (4th Cir 2007)

Legislation

England
Civil Evidence Act, 1995
Criminal Justice Act, 2003

Canada
Canada Evidence Act, 1985
Uniform Electronic Evidence Act, 1999

South Africa
Civil Proceedings Evidence Act 25 of 1965
Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977
Cybercrimes and Cybersecurity Bill B6-2017
Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 25 of 2002
Law of Evidence Amendment Act 45 of 1988
United States of America
Federal Rules of Evidence, 1975
International instruments
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Model Law on Electronic Commerce (1996)
Internet sources
CIA 2017 https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/
fields/2100.html
Central Intelligence Agency 2017 World Fact Book: Field Listing Legal System https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/
2100.html accessed 8 June 2017
Groulx, Rothman and Zawidzki 2011 https://www.dentons.com/~/
media/FMC%20Import/publications/pdf/a/Admissibility%20Understanding%20Types%20and%20Sources%20of%20Electronic%20Evidence.ashx
Groulx K, Rothman C and Zawidzki M 2011 Admissibility: Understanding Types and Sources of Electronic Evidence https://www.dentons.com/
~/media/FMC%20Import/publications/pdf/a/Admissibility%20Understanding%20Types%20and%20Sources%20of%20Electronic%20Evidence.ashx accessed 1 February 2017
Joseph 1999 http://www.jha.com/us/articles/viewarticle.php?8
Joseph GP 1999 A Simplified Approach to Computer-Generated Evidence and Animations http://www.jha.com/us/articles/viewarticle.php?8 accessed 8 June 2017
Internet World Stats 2017 http://www.internetworldstats.com/africa.htm#za
Internet World Stats 2017 Usage and Population Statistics: South Africa http://www.internetworldstats.com/africa.htm#za accessed 1 February 2018
Miskel 2015 http://www.emilymiskel.com/blog/admissibility-of-digital-evidence-in-a-family-case/
Miskel E 2015 Admissibility of Digital Evidence in a Family Case http://www.emilymiskel.com/blog/admissibility-of-digital-evidence-in-a-family-case/ accessed 8 June 2017
Pendleton 2013 http://mnbenchbar.com/2013/10/admissibility-of-electronic-evidence/
Pendleton A 2013 Admissibility of Electronic Evidence: A New Evidentiary Frontier http://mnbenchbar.com/2013/10/admissibility-of-electronic-evidence/ accessed 8 June 2017
Seng and Chakravarthi 2003 https://www.agc.gov.sg/DATA/0/Docs/
PublicationFiles/Sep_03_ComputerOutput.pdf
Seng D and Chakravarthi S 2003 Technology Law Development Group, Singapore Academy of Law - Computer Output as Evidence: Consultation Paper https://www.agc.gov.sg/DATA/0/Docs/PublicationFiles/Sep_03
_ComputerOutput.pdf 14 accessed 2 March 2017
Thomson 2012 https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/events/
science_technology/mobiledevices_new_challenges_admissibility_of_electronic_device.authcheckdam.pdf
Thomson LL 2012 Mobile Devices: New Challenges for Admissibility of Electronic Evidence https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/events/
science_technology/mobiledevices_new_challenges_admissibility_of_electronic_device.authcheckdam.pdf accessed 2 March 2017
Views
  • Abstract 0
  • pdf 0
  • XML 0
Views and downloads are with effect from 11 January 2018
Published
2018-03-27
Section
Articles