Cone beam computer tomography imaging of temporomandibular joint for forensic identification: A scoping review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/sadj.v80i02.20670Keywords:
Cone beam computed tomography, forensic identification, forensic dentistry, temporomandibular jointAbstract
The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is one of the most complex joints in the human body and it has been demonstrated to possess morphological features that are potentially valuable for forensic identification, both comparative and reconstructive. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has exhibited increasing utilisation in dentistry due to its lower radiation dose, cost-effectiveness and expedited processing time. Given the substantial challenges encountered in forensic identification, we present a scoping review of TMJ studies for forensic identification through CBCT. From a total of 115 articles identified, seven were selected, all published between
2013 and 2024 by authors from Asian countries and without international collaborations. Several proposals for identification were ascertained, predominantly focused on reconstructive identification. Only one article postulated a comparative identification method. This indicates there is interest in utilising CBCT to study the TMJ for forensic identification; however, as there are no population
validations, standardised protocols or technical capabilities for field work, further research is warranted.
Downloads
References
1. Gutiérrez-Tiznado P, López-Lázaro S, Fonseca GM. Use of “bicondylar” as a descriptive term for the temporomandibular joint: A scoping review. Int J Morphol 2022; 40: 1054-9
2. Suzuki K, Nakano H, Inoue K, Nakajima Y, Mizobuchi S, Omori M, et al . Examination of new parameters for sex determination of mandible using Japanese computer tomography data. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2020; 49: 20190282
3. Tassoker M, Kabakci ADA, Akin D, Sener S. Evaluation of mandibular notch, coronoid process, and mandibular condyle configurations with cone beam computed tomography. Biomed Res 2017; 28: 8327-35
4. Shanin KA, Chatra L, Shenai P. Dental and craniofacial imaging in forensics. JOFRI 2013; 1: 56-62
5. Coelho J, Armelim Almiro P, Nunes T, Kato R, Garib D, Miguéis A, et al . Sex and age biological variation of the mandible in a Portuguesepopulation –forensic and medicolegal approaches with three-dimensional analysis. Sci Justice 2021; 61: 704-13
6. Pretty IA. Forensic dentistry: 1. Identification of human remains. Dent Update 2007; 34: 621-2, 624-6, 629-30 passim
7. Benazzi S, Fantini M, De Crescenzio F, Mallegni G, Mallegni F, Persiani F, et al. The face of the poet Dante Alighieri reconstructed by virtual modelling and forensic anthropology techniques. J Archaeol Sci 2009; 36: 278-83
8. Fonseca GM, Cantín M, Lucena J. Odontología Forense II: La Identificación Inequívoca. Int J Odontostomat 2013; 7: 327-34
9. Blau S, Graham J, Smythe L, Rowbotham S. Human identification: a review of methods employed within an Australian coronial death investigation system. Int J Legal Med 2021; 135: 375-85
10. Zimmerman HA, Meizel-Lambert CJ, Schultz JJ, Sigman ME. Chemical Differentiation of Osseous, Dental, and Non-skeletal Materials in Forensic Anthropology using Elemental Analysis. Sci Justice 2015; 55: 131-8
11. Manigandan T, Sumathy C, Elumalai M, Sathasivasubramanian S, Kannan A. Forensic radiology in dentistry. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2015; 7: S260-4
12. Chaurasia A, Giri S. Evaluation of mandibular condyle morphology in Indian ethnics. J Oral Med Oral Surg Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2017; 3: 17-22
13. Omami G, Miller CS. Imaging Evaluation of the Temporomandibular Joint. Dent Clin North Am 2024; 68: 357-73
14. Dieckmeyer M, Sollmann N, Kupfer K, Löffler MT, Paprottka KJ, Kirschke JS, et al. Computed Tomography of the Head: A Systematic Review on Acquisition and Reconstruction Techniques to Reduce Radiation Dose. Clin Neuroradiol 2023; 33: 591-610
15. Nardi C, Talamonti C, Pallotta S, Saletti P, Calistri L, Cordopatri C, et al. Head and neck effective dose and quantitative assessment of image quality: a study to compare cone beam CT and multislice spiral CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2017; 46: 20170030
16. Alam MK, Ganji KK, Munisekhar MS, Alanazi NS, Alsharif HN, Iqbal A, et al. Application of CBCT technology in forensic odontology: A narrative review. Saudi Dent J 2022; 34: 88-96
17. Cunha E, Obertová Z. Forensic identification in a multidisciplinary perspective focusing on big challenges. Forensic Sci Res 2024; 9: owae063
18. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist andexplanation. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169: 467-73
19. P JE, T N U. Distinctive Anatomical Patterns of the Mandibular Coronoid Process, Condyle, and Sigmoid Notch: Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Imaging for Advanced Personal Identification. Cureus 2024; 16: e60978
20. Sethna Muthlakshmi KS, Krithika CL, Asokan K. Evaluation and correlation of condylar cortication by cone-beam computed tomography: A retrospective study. Contemp Clin Dent 2022; 13: 30-4
21. Bayrak S, Halıcıoglu Sıı, Kose Gü, Halıcıoglu K, Evaluation of the relationship between mandibular condyle cortication and chronologic age with cone beam computed tomography. J Forensic Leg Med 2018; 55: 39-44
22. Alam MK, Ganji KK, Munisekhar MS, Alanazi NS, Alsharif HN, Iqbal A, et al . A 3D cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) investigation of mandibular condyle morphometry: Gender determination, disparities, asymmetry assessment and relationship with mandibular size. Saudi Dent J 2021; 33: 687-92
23. Lei J, Liu MQ, Yap AUJ, Fu KY. Condylar subchondral formation of cortical bone in adolescents and young adults. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 51: 63-8
24. INTERPOL. Disaster Victim Identification Guide. 2023. [cited 2 November 2024]. Available from: https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Forensics/Disaster-VictimIdentification-DVI
25. Adserias-Garriga J, Feirstein S, Bell D, Skropits H, Dirkmaat DC. Human identification through forensic skeletal analysis: three case reviews. Forensic Sci Res 2024; 9: owae053
26. Glengarry J, Beaugeois M, Bugeja L, Huggins R, O’Donnell C. Suspension-associated dislocation of the jaw in hanging. Int J Legal Med 2023; 137: 1489-95
27. Beaugeois M, Glengarry J, O’Donnell C, Bugeja L. What is the presence and role of dislocation of the temporomandibular joint in the injury profile of hanging deaths? Pathology 2024; 56: S91-2
28. Silva RF, Picoli FF, Botelho TL, Resende RG, Franco A. Forensic Identification of Decomposed Human Body through Comparison between Ante-Mortem and PostMortem CT Images of Frontal Sinuses: Case Report. Acta Stomatol Croat 2017; 51: 227-31
29. Kumagai A, Izumisawa M, Takahashi N, Biwasaka H. Effectiveness and limitations of human identification from cremains: A report of two cases. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2021; 53: 101933
30. Nickell J, Fischer JF. Crime Science: Methods of forensic detection. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1999
31. Munhoz L, Okada S, Hisatomi M, Yanagi Y, Arita ES, Asaumi J. Are computed tomography images of the mandible useful in age and sex determination? A forensic science meta-analysis. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2024; 42: 38-57
32. Danforth RA, Herschaft EE, Weems RA. Dental, oral, and maxillofacial radiographic features of forensic interest. In: Senn DR, Weems RA, eds. ASFO’s Manual of Forensic Odontology, 5th ed. Boca Raton: CRC press, 2013
33. de Boer HH, Roberts J, Delabarde T, Mundorff AZ, Blau S. Disaster victim identification operations with fragmented, burnt, or commingled remains: experience-based recommendations. Forensic Sci Res 2020; 5: 191-201
34. Kim NH, Yang BE, Kang SH, Kim YH, Na JY, Kim JE, et al. Preclinical and Preliminary Evaluation of Perceived Image Quality of AI-Processed Low-Dose CBCT Analysis of a Single Tooth. Bioengineering (Basel) 2024; 11: 576
35. Kamburoğlu K, Kolsuz E, Kurt H, Kiliç C, Özen T, Paksoy CS. Accuracy of CBCT measurements of a human skull. J Digit Imaging 2011; 24: 787-93
36. Kamburoğlu K, Kiliç C, Ozen T, Yüksel SP. Measurements of mandibular canal region obtained by cone-beam computed tomography: a cadaveric study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107: e34-42
37. Beaini TL, Dias PE, Melani RF. Dry skull positioning device for extra-oral radiology and cone-beam CT. Int J Legal Med 2014; 128: 235-41
38. Rötzscher K, Grundmann C, Benthaus S. The effects of high temperatures on human teeth and dentures. Int Poster J Dent Oral Med 2004; 6: Poster 213
39. Schmeling A, Olze A, Reisinger W, Geserick G. Forensic age estimation and ethnicity. Leg Med 2005; 7: 134-7
40. Burt NM, Semple D, Waterhouse K, Lovell NC. Identification and interpretation of joint disease in paleopathology and forensic anthropology. Springfield: Charles C Thomas, 2013
41. Silver WE, Souviron RR. Dental autopsy. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2009
42. Fonseca GM, Rojas-Torres J. “To do more with less”. Forensic Sci Int 2024; 361:112118
43. Mowafey B, Van de Casteele E, Youssef JM, Zaher AR, Omar H, Politis C, et al. Can mandibular lingual canals be used as a forensic fingerprint? J Forensic Odontostomatol 2015; 33: 26-35
44. Kumagai A, Izumisawa M, Takahashi N, Biwasaka H. Effectiveness and limitations of human identification from cremains: A report of two cases. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2021; 53: 101933
45. Rivera-Mendoza F, Martín-de-Las-Heras S, Navarro-Cáceres P, Fonseca GM. Bite Mark Analysis in Foodstuffs and Inanimate Objects and the Underlying Proofs for Validity and Judicial Acceptance. J Forensic Sci 2018; 63: 449-59
46. Espinoza-Silva PV, López-Lázaro S, Fonseca GM. Forensic odontology and dental age estimation research: a scoping review a decade after the NAS report on strengthening forensic science. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 2023; 19: 224-35
47. Mohammad N, Ahmad R, Kurniawan A, Mohd Yusof MYP. Applications of contemporary artificial intelligence technology in forensic odontology as primary forensic identifier: A scoping review. Front Artif Intell 2022; 5: 1049584
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
.png){kind=spacer}