Dentine thicknesses of fi rst molar roots: A review of the literature with illustrative cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/sadj.v80i02.20656Keywords:
Danger zone, safety zone, iatrogenic perforation, tertiary dentine, mesial root, distal root, mesiobuccal rootAbstract
Thin dentinal walls of first molars can significantly impact the success and outcomes of endodontic procedures, including root canal treatment. Root canal treatment is commonly performed on first molars, which are prone to decay due to their early eruption and complex occlusal structure. The treatment entails a series of mechanical and chemical disinfection techniques where the root canal spaces are enlarged and can be compromised by perforations leading to infection, inflammation and eventual tooth loss. The
thinner the dentine, the greater the likelihood of perforation. “Danger zones” have been identified as the distal aspect of
mesial/mesiobuccal roots and the mesial aspect of distal roots. Knowledge of dentine thickness patterns in dental roots and understanding factors that influence dentine thickness can help reduce the risk of perforation and improve treatment outcomes. This literature review gives an overview of various aspects of the dentine thickness of the maxillary and mandibular first permanent molar.
The content is supported by illustrative micro-CT images and clinical cases. Treating physicians should take note that variations in dentine thicknesses have been reported between sexes, with ageing and among populations, but unfortunately no studies on dentine thickness could be found specifically for the South African context.
Downloads
References
1. Bjørndal L, Laustsen MH, Reit C. Root canal treatment in Denmark is most often carried out in carious vital molar teeth and retreatments are rare. Int Endod J. 2006; 39: 785-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01149.x
2. Zhou G, Leng D, Li M, et al. Root dentine thickness of danger zone in mesial roots of mandibular first molars. BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20: 1-6. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-1026-8
3. Sarao SK, Berlin-Broner Y, Levin L. Occurrence and risk factors of dental root perforations: a systematic review. Int Dent J. 2021; 71: 96-105. DOI: 10.1111/idj.12602
4. Davis GR, Tayeb RA, Seymour KG, et al. Quantification of residual dentine thickness following crown preparation. J Dent. 2012; 40: 571-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.006
5. Lee K-W, Kim Y, Perinpanayagam H, et al. Comparison of alternative image reformatting techniques in micro-computed tomography and tooth clearing for detailed canal morphology. J Endod. 2014; 40: 417-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.09.014
6. Tabassum S, Khan FR. Failure of endodontic treatment: the usual suspects. Eur J Dent. 2016; 10: 144-7. DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.175682
7. Saed SM, Ashley MP, Darcey J. Root perforations: aetiology, management strategies and outcomes. The hole truth. Br Dent J. 2016; 220: 171-80. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.132
8. Clauder T. Present status and future directions – managing perforations. Int Endod J. 2022; 55: 872-91. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13748
9. Ng Y-L, Mann V, Gulabivala K. A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: part 1: periapical health: Outcome of nonsurgical root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2011; 44: 583-609. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01872.x
10. Lease LR. Anatomy of individual teeth and tooth classes. In: Irish J, Scott G, eds. A Companion to Dental Anthropology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 2015: 94-107. DOI: 10.1002/9781118845486.ch1
11. Bhargavi A, Ajay S, Rohit B, et al. Comparative tooth anatomy – A review. IJDSR. 2013; 1: 34-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdsr.2013.03.003
12. Chourasia HR, Meshram GK, Warhadpande M, et al. Root canal morphology of mandibular first permanent molars in an Indian population. Int J Dent. 2012: 1-6. DOI: 10.1155/2012/745152
13. Nicholson JW, Czarnecka B. The clinical repair of teeth using direct filling materials: engineering considerations. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2006; 220: 635-45. DOI: 10.1243/09544119H07704
14. De Moor RJG, Deroose CAJG, Calberson FLG. The radix entomolaris in mandibular first molars: an endodontic challenge. Int Endod J. 2004; 37: 789-99. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00870.x
15. Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Topics. 2005; 10: 3-29. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00129.x
16. Jonker C, van der Vyver PJ. Factors influencing the life span of modern root canal instruments – a literature review. SADJ. 2013; 68: 14-23
17. Cheung GSP. Survival of first-time nonsurgical root canal treatment performed in a dental teaching hospital. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002; 93: 596-604. DOI: 10.1067/moe.2002.120254
18. Stankiewicz NR, Wilson PR. The ferrule effect: a literature review. Int Endod J. 2002; 35: 575-81. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00557.x
19. Magne P, Goldberg J, Edelhoff D, et al. Composite resin core buildups with and without post for the restoration of endodontically treated molars without ferrule. Oper Dent. 2016; 41: 64-75. DOI: 10.2341/14-258-L
20. Estrela C, Decurcio DDA, Rossi-Fedele G, et al. Root perforations: a review of diagnosis, prognosis and materials. Braz Oral Res. 2018; 32: 133-46. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor2018.vol32.0073
21. Kvinnsland I, Oswald RJ, Halse A, et al. A clinical and roentgenological study of 55 cases of root perforation. Int Endod J. 1989; 22: 75-84. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1989.tb00509.x
22. Smith AJ, Scheven BA, Takahashi Y, et al. Dentine as a bioactive extracellular matrix. Arch Oral Biol. 2012; 57: 109-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.07.008
23. Nudel I, Pokhojaev A, Bitterman Y, et al. Secondary dentin formation mechanism: the effect of attrition. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18: 1-10. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18199961
24. Senawongse P, Otsuki M, Tagami J, et al. Age-related changes in hardness and modulus of elasticity of dentine. Arch Oral Biol. 2006; 51: 457-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2005.11.006
25. Orhan EO, Maden M, Senguüven B. Odontoblast-like cell numbers and reparative dentine thickness after direct pulp capping with platelet-rich plasma and enamel matrix derivative: a histomorphometric evaluation. Int Endod J. 2012; 45: 317-25; DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-
2591.2011.01977.x
26. Hakami Z, Marghalani HY, Hedad I, et al. Comparison of tooth color and enamel and dentinal thickness between orthodontically treated and untreated individuals. Diagnostics. 2023; 13: 1-12. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13122066
27. Abou-Rass M, Frank AL, Glick DH. The anticurvature filing method to prepare the curved root canal. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980; 101: 792-4. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1980.0427
28. Berutti E, Fedon G. Thickness of cementum/dentin in mesial roots of mandibular first molars. J Endod. 1992; 18:545-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81211-2
29. Sant’Anna Júnior A, Cavenago BC, Ordinola-Zapata R, et al. The effect of larger apical preparations in the danger zone of lower molars prepared using the mtwo and reciproc systems. J Endod. 2014; 40: 1855-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.020
30. Harris SP, Bowles WR, Fok A, et al. An anatomic investigation of the mandibular first molar using micro-computed tomography. J Endod. 2013; 39: 1374-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.034
31. Garcia Filho PF, Letra A, Menezes R, et al. Danger zone in mandibular molars before instrumentation: an in vitro study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2003; 11: 324-6. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572003000400009
32. Sauáia TS, Gomes BPFA, Pinheiro ET, et al. Thickness of dentine in mesial roots of mandibular molars with different lengths. Int Endod J. 2010; 43: 555-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01694.x
33. Leite Pinto S, Lins R, Videira Marceliano-Alves M, et al. The internal anatomy of danger zone of mandibular molars: A cone-beam computed tomography study. J Conserv Dent. 2018; 21: 481-4. DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_271_18
34. De-Deus G, Rodrigues EA, Belladonna FG, et al. Anatomical danger zone reconsidered: a micro-CT study on dentine thickness in mandibular molars. Int Endod J. 2019; 52: 1501-7. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13141
35. Keles A, Keskin C, Alqawasmi R, et al. Evaluation of dentine thickness of middle mesial canals of mandibular molars prepared with rotary instruments: a micro-CT study. Int Endod J. 2020; 53: 519-28. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13247
36. Sousa VCD, Alencar AHGD, Bueno MR, et al. Evaluation in the danger zone of mandibular molars after root canal preparation using novel CBCT software. Braz Oral Res. 2022; 36: 1-12. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0038
37. Chang Y-R, Choi Y-S, Choi G-W, et al. Evaluation of danger zone in mesial root of mandibular first molar by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Korean Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. 2007; 40: 103-10
38. Tabrizizadeh M, Reuben J, Khalesi M, et al. Evaluation of radicular dentin thickness of danger zone in mandibular first molars. J Dent (Tehran). 2010; 7: 196-9
39. Dwivedi S, Dwivedi CD, Mittal N. Correlation of root dentin thickness and length of roots in mesial roots of mandibular molars. J Endod. 2014; 40: 1435-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.02.011
40. Jonker CH, Van Der Vyver PJ, Oettlé AC. Root and canal morphology of the mandibular first molar: A micro-computed tomography-focused observation of literature with illustrative cases. Part 1: External root morphology. SADJ. 2023; 78: 449-56. DOI: 10.17159/sadj.v78i09.16861
41. Bolbolian M, Ramezani M, Valadabadi M, et al. Dentin thickness of the danger zone in the mesial roots of the mandibular molars: a cone beam computed tomography analysis. Front Biosci (Schol Ed). 2023; 15: 1-9. DOI: 10.31083/j.fbs1501003
42. Ordinola-Zapata R, Martins JNR, Versiani MA, et al. Micro-CT analysis of danger zone thickness in the mesiobuccal roots of maxillary first molars. Int Endod J. 2019; 52: 524-9. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13025
43. Azimi V. Comparison of dentinal wall thickness in the furcation area (danger zone) in the first and second mesiobuccal canals in the maxillary first and second molars using cone-beam computed tomography. Eur Endod J. 2020; 2: 81-5. DOI: 10.14744/eej.2020.18189
44. Akhlaghi NM, Kahali R, Abtahi A, et al. Comparison of dentine removal using V-taper and K-Flexofile instruments. Int Endod J. 2010; 43: 1029-36. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01769.x
45. Silva EJNL, Rover G, Belladonna FG, et al. Impact of contracted endodontic cavities on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Clin Oral Invest. 2018; 22: 109-18. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-017-2268-y
46. Martin G, Arce Brissón G, Chen B, et al. Root dentine thickness in C-shaped lower second molars after instrumentation: A CBCT and micro-CT study. Aust Endod J. 2021; 47: 122-9; DOI: 10.1111/aej.12509
47. Deutsch A, Musikant B. Morphological measurements of anatomic landmarks in human maxillary and mandibular molar pulp chambers. J Endod. 2004; 30: 388-90. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200406000-00003
48. Gaba C, Gurtu A, Bansal R, et al. Morphological measurements of anatomical landmarks in human maxillary first molar pulp chambers and evaluation of number of pulp canal orifices using spiral computed tomography: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2019; 22: 233-6. DOI:
10.4103/JCD.JCD_568_18
49. Dabawala S, Chacko V, Suprabha BS, et al. Evaluation of pulp chamber dimensions of primary molars from bitewing radiographs. Pediatr Dent. 2015; 37: 361-5
50. Majzoub Z, Kon S. Tooth morphology following root resection procedures in maxillary first molars. J Periodontol. 1992; 63: 290-6; DOI: 10.1902/jop.1992.63.4.290
51. Sterrett JD, Pelletier H, Russell CM. Tooth thickness at the furcation entrance of lower molars. J Clin Periodontol. 1996; 23: 621-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00585.x
52. Lokade J, Rawlani S, Baheti R, et al. Morphological measurements of anatomic landmarks in human mandibular molar pulp chambers – an in vivo study. Journal of Korean Dental Science. 2011; 4: 1-5. DOI: 10.5856/JKDS.2011.4.1.001
53. Philippas GG. Influence of occlusal wear and age on formation of dentin and size of pulp chamber. J Dent Res. 1961; 40: 1186-98. DOI: 10.1177/00220345610400061301
54. Keskin C, Toplu D, Keleş A. Dentine thickness in maxillary fused molars depends on the fusion type: An ex vivo micro-computed tomography study. Int Endod J. 2023; 56: 637-46. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13891
55. Buchanan GD, Gamieldien MY, Tredoux S, et al. Root and canal configurations of maxillary premolars in a South African subpopulation using cone beam computed tomography and two classification systems. J Oral Sci. 2020; 62: 93-7. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.19-0160
56. Spencer P, Wang Y, Katz JL. Dentin. In: M Akay, editor. Wiley Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering. New Jersey: Wiley, 2006: 1051-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780471740360.ebs0346
57. Mireku AS, Romberg E, Fouad AF, et al. Vertical fracture of root filled teeth restored with posts: the effects of patient age and dentine thickness. Int Endod J. 2010; 43: 218-25. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01661.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
.png){kind=spacer}