The association between feedback delivery and student self-regulation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/sadj.v80i06.23579Keywords:
Ethics, feedback, self-regulation, psychological safetyAbstract
This paper examined the association between the mode of feedback delivery and the student’s ability to self-regulate learning.
Downloads
References
1. Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2007;77(1):81-112.
2. Bellhäuser H, Dignath C, Theobald M. Daily automated feedback enhances selfregulated learning: a longitudinal randomized field experiment. Front Psychol. 2023;18;14:1125873.
3. Eva KW, Regehr G. Effective feedback for maintenance of competence: from data delivery to trusting dialogues. CMAJ. 2013;185(6):463-4.
4. Hashemipour MA, Hosseini V, Kamyabi H. Stressors in Dental Students During the Transition from Theory to Practice: A Qualitative Research. SADJ. 2022;77( ):386-93.
5. Hardie P, O’Donovan R, Jarvis S, Redmond C. Key tips to providing a psychologicallysafe learning environment in the clinical setting. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):1-1.
6. Zimmerman BJ. Investigating self-regulation and motivation: historical background,methodological developments, and future prospects. Am Educ Res J. 2008;45(1):166-83.
7. Cox DJ. Descriptive and normative ethical behavior appear to be functionally distinct.J Appl Behav Anal. 2021;54(1):168-91.
8. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. IntSurg J. 202;88:105906.
9. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol.2006;1;3(2):77-101.
10. Fullerton PD, Sarkar M, Haque S, McKenzie W. Culture and understanding the role of feedback for health professions students: realist synthesis protocol. BMJ open. 2022;12(2):e049462.
11. Irlenbusch B, Rilke RM, Walkowitz G. Designing feedback in voluntary contribution games: the role of transparency. Exp Econ. 2019;22:552-76.
12. Emke AR, Cheng S, Dufault C, Cianciolo AT, Musick D, Richards B, et al. Developing professionalism via multisource feedback in team-based learning. Teach Learn Med.2015;27(4):362-5.
13. Johnson CE, Keating JL, Farlie MK, Kent F, Leech M, Molloy EK. Educators’behaviours during feedback in authentic clinical practise settings: an observational study and systematic analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):1-1.
14. Eva KW, Regehr G. Effective feedback for maintenance of competence: from data delivery to trusting dialogues. CMAJ. 2013;185(6):463-4.
15. Herrmann-Werner A, Loda T, Erschens R, Schneider P, Junne F, Gilligan C, TeufelM, Zipfel S, Keifenheim KE. Face yourself! -learning progress and shame in different approaches of video feedback: a comparative study. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):1-8.
16. Fourie MM, Thomas KG, Amodio DM, Warton CM, Meintjes EM. Neural correlates of experienced moral emotion: an fMRI investigation of emotion in response to prejudice feedback. Soc Neurosci. 2014;9(2):203-18.
17. Rösler IK, van Nunspeet F, Ellemers N. Falling on deaf ears: The effects of senderidentity and feedback dimension on how people process and respond to negative feedback− An ERP study. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2023;104:104419.
18. Larson EL, Patel SJ, Evans D, Saiman L. Feedback as a strategy to change behaviour: the devil is in the details. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013;19(2):230-4.
19. Henry D, Vesel T, Boscardin C, van Schaik S. Motivation for feedback-seeking among pediatric residents: a mixed methods study. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18:1-7.
20. Gong Z, Van Swol L, Xu Z, Yin K, Zhang N, Gul Gilal F, et al. High-power distance is not always bad: ethical leadership results in feedback Seeking. Front Psychol. 2019;27;10:2137.
21. Moss SE, Song M, Hannah ST, Wang Z, Sumanth JJ. The duty to improve oneself: How duty orientation mediates the relationship between ethical leadership and followers’ feedback-seeking and feedback-avoiding behavior. J Bus Ethics. 2020;165:615-31.
22. Mouratidis A, Lens W, Vansteenkiste M. How you provide corrective feedback makes a difference: The motivating role of communicating in an autonomy-supporting way. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2010;32(5):619-37.
23. Harrison CJ, Könings KD, Dannefer EF, Schuwirth LW, Wass V, van der Vleuten CP. Factors influencing students’ receptivity to formative feedback emerging from different assessment cultures. Perspect Med Educ. 2016;5:276-84.
24. Martin JG. Teaching without fear. The Learning Professional. 2020;41(2):36-8.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


.png)