The Paradox of Perception – You do not need THE EYES to SEE the person
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/sadj.v80i07.24237Keywords:
prosopagnosia, contextualAbstract
Covering the eyes of patients in reports or public images is often done to preserve anonymity, dignity and confidentiality. However, human recognition is a complex process involving a variety of sensory inputs that extend far beyond mere visual processing. One can often identify a person based on other non-visual cues, including auditory, tactile, social, contextual, cultural, and emotional dimensions. With regards to the face, blocking out the eyes alone does not guarantee that a person’s identity will be concealed. This is because there are many other geometric and anatomical features that the brain is attuned to recognising. In addition, modern
AI programmes can often be used to re-insert blocked-out features. This paper suggests that from both an ethical and legal perspective, we need to develop more sophisticated ways of treating patient facial photographs to ensure that they are truly not recognisable to others.
Downloads
References
1. Chatgpt.com. Search words: eyes; identity; perception; anonymity. Accessed on: 20-03-2025.
2. Yovel, G., & Duchaine, B. (2006). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on faceperception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(3), 68-74.
3. Kanwisher, N. (2000). Domain specificity in face perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3(8),759-763.
4. Schwartz, S. A., et al. (2004). Voice perception and its role in identity recognition.Psychological Science, 15(4), 244-248.
5. Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77(3), 305-327.
6. Bennet KG, Bonawitz SC, Vercler CJ. (2019) Guidelines for the ethical publication of facial photographs and review of the literature. Am Cleft Palate,56(1)7-14.
7. Clover AJ, Fitzpatrick E, Healy C. (2010) Analysis of methods of providing anonymity in facial photographs: A randomised controlled study. Ir Med J; 103(8):243-245.
8. Koch CA, Larrabee W (2013) Patient privacy, photographs and publication. JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 15(5):486-491.
9. Rose CD. (2017) Ethical conduct of research in children: Paediatricians and their IRB. Paediatrics;139(5):e20163648.
10. Lau CK, Schumacher HH, Irwin MS (2010) Patients’ perception of medical photography. J Plast Reconst Aesthet Surg. 63(6):e507-e511.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
.png){kind=spacer}