Kinematic differences between left- and right-handed cricket fast bowlers during the bowling action

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/2078-516X/2023/v35i1a15144

Abstract

Background: Despite differences between left- and right-handed athletes in other sports, minimal evidence exists regarding biomechanical similarities and differences between left- and right-handed cricket fast bowlers performing an equivalent task.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the kinematics between left and right-handed fast bowlers performing an equivalent task (i.e. bowling ‘over the wicket’ to a batter of the same handedness as the bowler).

Methods: Full body, three-dimensional kinematic data for six left-handed and 20 right-handed adolescent, male, fast bowlers were collected using the Xsens inertial measurement system. Time-normalised joint and segment angle time histories from back foot contact to follow-through ground contacts were compared between groups via statistical parametric mapping. Whole movement and subphase durations were also compared.

Results: Left-handed players displayed significantly more trunk flexion from 49%-56% of the total movement (ball release occurred at 54%; p = 0.037) and had shorter back foot contact durations on average (0.153 vs 0.177 s; p = 0.036) compared to right-handed players.

Conclusion: Left- and right-handed bowlers displayed similar sagittal plane kinematics but appeared to use non-sagittal plane movements differently around the time of ball release. The kinematic differences identified in this study can inform future research investigating the effect of hand dominance on bowling performance and injury risk.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-05

Issue

Section

Special Cricket Edition

How to Cite

Olivier, B., Boulle, N., Jacobs, J., Obiora, O. L., MacMillan, C., Liebenberg, J., & McErlain-Naylor, S. (2023). Kinematic differences between left- and right-handed cricket fast bowlers during the bowling action. South African Journal of Sports Medicine, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.17159/2078-516X/2023/v35i1a15144
Views
  • Abstract 681
  • PDF 450