Differences in playing experience, anthropometry and performance measures between Under 16 schoolboy rugby players classified as starters or non-starters: A comparative cross-sectional study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/2078-516X/2025/v37i1a19947

Keywords:

rugby, anthropometrics, performance characteristics, Zimbabwe, playing experience

Abstract

Background: Schoolboy rugby is becoming increasingly popular around the world. Although sports participation is commendable because of its health benefits, the involvement of schoolchildren in highly competitive rugby continues to stimulate research interest. Questions regarding schoolboys possessing the requisite qualities/skills are inevitable and should be addressed scientifically.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine potential differences in playing experience, anthropometry, and performance measures (physiological characteristics and game-specific skills) between starting and non-starting players in schoolboy rugby.

Methods: A cross-sectional design was utilised with 71 rugby players playing Under 16 rugby. The participants came from three secondary schools based in Harare, Zimbabwe, known for playing highly competitive rugby. The participants were measured for playing experience, anthropometry and performance measures such as speed, agility, upper-and-lower-muscular strength/power, muscle flexibility, prolonged high-intensity intermittent running ability, tackling, passing, and catching abilities.

Results: The starters had more playing experience in competitive schoolboy rugby than non-starters (p<0.001). The Wall Sit Leg Strength test for lower-limb isometric strength (p=0.01), Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Level 1 test for prolonged high-intensity intermittent running ability (p=0.03), Tackling Proficiency test (p=0.02), Passing Ability Skills test (p=0.01), and Passing-for-Accuracy over 7 m test (p<0.001) discriminated starters from non-starters. The starters showed superior scores compared to the non-starters.

Conclusion: These results indicate that the qualities/skills are better developed among starters and that further training by coaches is needed among the non-starters.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. World Till K, Weakley J, Read DB, et al. Applied sport science for male age-grade rugby union in England. Sports Med-Open. 2020; 6(1):14. [https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-020-0236-6] [PMID: 32086645]

2. Dimundo F, Cole M, Blagrove RC, et al. Talent identification and development in an English Premiership rugby union club: The perspectives of players and coaches. Front Sports Act Living. 2023;5:1120033. [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1120033] [PMID: 38022777]

3. Chiwaridzo M, Ferguson GD, Smits-Engelsman BCM. Anthropometric, physiological characteristics and rugby-specific game skills discriminating Zimbabwean under-16 male adolescent rugby players by level of competition. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019;5(1):e000576.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000576] [PMID: 31548905]

4. Lambert M. Risks of injury in youth rugby-what are the issues? S Afr J Sports Med 2015;27(1):2. [http://dx.doi.org/10.7196/SAJSM.616]

5. Chiwaridzo M, Oorschot S, Dambi JM, et al. A systematic review investigating measurement properties of physiological tests in rugby. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2017;9:24 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-017-0081-1] [PMID: 29299317]

6. Oorschot S, Chiwaridzo M, CM Smits-Engelsman B. Psychometric evaluation of commonly used game-specific skills tests in rugby: A systematic review. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2017;3:e000281 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000281] [PMID: 29259812]

7. Gabbett TJ. Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of starters and non-starters in junior rugby league players,13-17 years. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2009; 49(3):233-239. [PMID: 19861929]

8. Gabbett TJ, Jenkins DG, Abernethy B. Physiological and anthropometric correlates of tackling ability in junior elite and sub-elite rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2010; 24(11):2989-2995. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181f00d22] [PMID: 20940633]

9. Grobler Gabbett T, Kelly J, Ralph S, Driscoll D. Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of junior elite and sub-elite rugby league players, with special reference to starters and non-starters. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12(1):215-222. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2007.06.008] [PMID: 18055259]

10. Young WB, Newton RU, Doyle TL, et al. Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of starters and non-starters and playing positions in elite Australian Rules Football: a case study. J Sci Med Sport. 2005;8(3):333-345. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1440-2440(05)80044-1][PMID: 16248474]

11. Gabbett TJ, Herzig PJ. Physiological characteristics of junior elite and sub-elite rugby league players. Strength Cond Coach. 2004;12(2):19-24

12. Gabbett TJ, Jenkins DG, Abernethy B. Relative importance of physiological, anthropometric, and skill qualities to team selection in professional rugby league. J Sports Sci.2011; 29(13):1453-1461. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2011.603348][PMID: 21834623]

13. Hunzinger KJ, Schussler E. The 50 most cited papers on rugby since 2000 reveal a focus primarily on strength and conditioning in elite male players. J Sports Med. 2023;2023(1):6991769. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/6991769] [PMID: 38148987]

14. Cabarkapa DV, Cabarkapa D, Fry AC. Starters vs. non-starters differences in vertical jump force-time metrics in female professional volleyball players. Front Sports Act Living. 2024; 6:1389001. [http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1389001][PMID: 38590296]

15. Chiwaridzo M, Chandahwa D, Oorschot S, et al. Logical validation and evaluation of practical feasibility for the SCRuM (School Clinical Rugby Measure) test battery developed for young adolescent rugby players in a resource-constrained environment. PLoS One. 2018;13(11): e0207307. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207307] [PMID: 30458016]

16. Brydges CR. Effect Size Guidelines, Sample Size Calculations, Innov Aging. 2019;3(4): igz036. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz036] [PMID: 31528719]

17. Gabbett TJ, Seibold AJ. Relationship between tests of physical qualities, team selection, and physical match performance in semiprofessional rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(12):3259-3265. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31828d6219] [PMID: 23442268]

18. Sato H, Sasaki K, Nakamura A, et al. Acute subdural hematoma in high school rugby players in Japan: The importance of playing experience for injury prevention. World Neurosurg. 2021;152:e112-e117. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.042] [PMID: 34044165]

19. Anyadike-Danes K, Donath L, Kiely J. Coaches’ perceptions of factors driving training adaptation: an international survey. Sports Med. 2023; 53(12): 2505-2512. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01894-1] [PMID: 37552460]

20. Read D, Weaving D, Phibbs P, et al. Movement and physical demands of school and university rugby union match-play in England. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2017; 2(1): e000147. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2016-000147] [PMID: 28879027]

Published

2025-06-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Chiwaridzo, M., von der Heiden , C., Kamba , F. E., & Mkumbuzi , N. S. . (2025). Differences in playing experience, anthropometry and performance measures between Under 16 schoolboy rugby players classified as starters or non-starters: A comparative cross-sectional study. South African Journal of Sports Medicine, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.17159/2078-516X/2025/v37i1a19947
Views
  • Abstract 1884
  • PDF 1820
  • PDF (Supplementary) 187
  • XML 152