An investigation into the player development pathway among youth soccer players in South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/2078-516X/2025/v37i1a20183Keywords:
coaching, talent, development, soccerAbstract
Background: Scant research has examined soccer player development trajectories in South Africa. Therefore, research on South African talent development may help create environments conducive to players’ learning and growth.
Objectives: The study aimed to investigate the factors affecting player development based on playing level (community team versus school academy) and playing phases (Youth Development Phase [YDP] versus Professional Development Phase [PDP]).
Methods: The study adopted a cross-sectional research design. A total of 112 male soccer players (Mage=16.2±1.2 years; 51 community-based team players and 61 school academy players; 73 YDP players and 39 PDP players) participated in the study. Data were collected using a 30-item Player Development Soccer Scale.
Results: Results showed that coaching (4.27±0.75 arbitrary units (AU)), personal mindset (4.24±0.63 AU) and social support network (4.17±0.63 AU) were perceived as the most important factors contributing to player development. The least important factor was sport psychology (3.62±0.83 AU). However, compared to school academy players, community team players recorded significantly (p<0.01) higher scores on all the factors of the player development pathway. None of the player development factors showed a significant (p>0.05) difference between YDP and PDP.
Conclusion: The current results may help teams support players psychologically so they can advance along their developmental pathway.
Downloads
References
1. Webb T, Dicks M, Brown DJ, O’Gorman J. An exploration of young professional football players’ perceptions of the talent development process in England. Sport Manag Rev 2020; 23(3):536-547 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2019.04.007] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2019.04.007
2. Premier League. Elite Player Performance Plan. London, 2011. https://www.premierleague.com/youth/eppp (accessed 20 June 2024).
3. Bloom BS. Generalizations about Talent Development. In: Bloom BS, ed. Developing Talent in Young People. New York: Ballantine Books, 1985:507-549.
4. Côté J. The influence of the family in the development of talent in sport. Sport Psychol 1999;13(4):395-417. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/tsp.13.4.395] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.13.4.395
5. South African Football Association. SAFA Regulations on Football Academies, Johannesburg, 2011. https://www.safa.net (accessed 28 June 2024).
6. Ma TL, Simpkins S, Puente K. Latinx and white adolescents’ reasons behind organized activity participation: The connections with cultural orientations, psychological engagement, and activity experiences. Appl Dev Sci 2021;25(2): 168-182. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2019.1571416] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2019.1571416
7. Diouf M, Miller J, Rothwell M. Professional soccer players perceptions of the English Football Association 4 corner model in supporting first team transitions. J Sports Sci 2024; 42(2):103-108. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2024.2335583] [PMID: 38545847]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2024.2335583
8. Cooper A. An investigation into the factors affecting player development within each phase of the academy pathway in English football academies. Soccer Soc 2020;22(5):429-441. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2020.1822342] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2020.1822342
9. Harwood CG, Barker JB, Anderson R. Psychosocial development in youth soccer players: Assessing the effectiveness of the 5Cs intervention program. Sport Psychol 2015; 29(4):319-334. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2014-0161] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2014-0161
10. Lagestad PA, Sæther SA, Ulvik A. Differences in coaching feedback between coaches of junior elite soccer players and junior amateur soccer players. J Phys Educ Sport 2017;17 (3):2049-2058. [http://dx.doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2017.03207] DOI: https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2017.03207
11. Finn J, McKenna J. Coping with academy-to-first-team transitions in elite English male team sports: The coaches’ perspective. Int J Sports Sci Coach 2010; 5(2):257-279. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1260/1747-9541.5.2.257] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1260/1747-9541.5.2.257
12. Taylor IM, Bruner MW. The social environment and developmental experiences in elite youth soccer. Psychol Sport Exerc 2012; 13(4):390-396. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.01.008] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.01.008
13. Mills A, Butt J, Maynard I, Harwood C. Toward an understanding of optimal development environments within elite English soccer academies. Sport Psychol 2014; 28(2):137-150. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2013-0018] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2013-0018
14. Van Yperen NW. ‘Why some make it and others do not: Identifying psychological factors that predict career success in professional adult soccer.’ Sport Psychol 2009; 23(2): 317-329. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/tsp.23.3.317] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.23.3.317
15. Dweck CS. Mindsets: Developing talent through a growth mindset. Olympic Coach 2009;21(1), 4-7.
16. Fraser-Thomas JL, Côté J, Deakin J. Youth sport programs: An avenue to foster positive youth development. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy 2005; 10(1): 19-40. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1740898042000334890] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1740898042000334890
17. Kubayi A, Coopoo Y, Morris-Eyton H. Coaches’ preferences for continuing coaching education in South Africa. J Hum Kinet 2016; 50: 229-234. [PMID: 28149360] [PMCID: PMC5260658] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0160
18. Cushion CJ, Armour KM, Jones RL. Locating the coaching process in practice: models ‘for’and ‘of’coaching. Physical education and sport pedagogy. 2006 Feb 1;11(01):83-99. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17408980500466995] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980500466995
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 South African Journal of Sports Medicine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The South African Journal of Sports Medicine reserves copyright of the material published. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License. Material submitted for publication in the South African Journal of Sports Medicine is accepted provided it has not been published elsewhere. The South African Journal of Sports Medicine does not hold itself responsible for statements made by the authors.
How to Cite
- Abstract 392
- PDF 317
.png){kind=spacer}