Community acceptance challenges of renewable energy transitions: A tale of two solar parks in Limpopo, South Africa

  • Elvis Modikela Nkoana University of South Africa
Keywords: Challenges, community acceptance, IPP, REIPPPP, solar parks, Limpopo province

Abstract

Severe problems of climate change, inequality, poverty, and unemployment have compelled the South African government to pass legislation that introduced programmes aimed at achieving energy security, promoting economic development, and realising environmental protection. The Renewable Energy Independent Power Producers Procurement Programme objective is to increase the share of renewable sources in the national energy mix, deliver jobs and economic empowerment for black communities (Africans, Coloureds, and Indians) and cut harmful greenhouse gas emissions. Independent power producers (IPPs) must demonstrate that their projects contribute to job creation and broad-based black economic empowerment during the bidding process. To date, studies suggest that IPPs are missing this government target. This study investigated this phenomenon through face-to-face interviews with key informants involved in the IPP process at two solar parks in Limpopo province. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyse and interpret the field notes. Findings reveal that the process of involving local communities in the governance of the IPP process is highly fragmented, leaving room for powerful stakeholders to thrive over vulnerable community members. The lack of monitoring by the government IPP office enables a prominent not-for-profit organisation to abscond from its responsibility of setting up a community trust for the benefit of local residents. Also, limited skills in the local communities mean that young people are employed in low-paying construction jobs that end after project commissioning. Lack of awareness and knowledge about IPP commitments made during the bidding process are responsible for the ‘wait and see’ approach of local leaders and community members. In the short-term, awareness and capacity-building interventions for local leaders and community members are urgently required to conscientise beneficiaries. It is imperative to create a participatory governance framework that prioritises vulnerable stakeholders as a long-term solution.

Author Biography

Elvis Modikela Nkoana, University of South Africa

ABET and Youth Development

Lecturer

References

Cohen, J. J., Reichl, J., and Schmidthaler, M. 2014. Re-focussing research efforts on the public acceptance of energy infrastructure: A critical review. Energy 76: 4-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.056.

Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). 2001. Participation: The new tyranny? Zed Books.

De Araújo, M. S. M., and de Freitas, M. A. V. 2008. Acceptance of renewable energy innovation in Brazil – Case study of wind energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 12(2): 584-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2006.03.017.

Department of Environment. 2011. National climate change response policy white paper. Pretoria: Government Printer.

Department of Energy. 2009. Digest of South African energy statistics. Pretoria: Government Printer.

Department of Energy. 1998. White paper on the energy policy of the Republic of South Africa. Pretoria: Government Printer.

Department of Minerals and Energy. 2003. Republic of South Africa white paper on renewable energy. Pretoria: Government Printer.

Devine-Wright, P. 2007. Reconsidering public attitudes and public acceptance of renewable energy technologies: A critical review. (Working Paper No. 1.4). Manchester Architecture Research Centre, University of Manchester. Available online at: http://geography.exeter.ac.uk/beyond_nimbyism/deliverables/bn_wp1_4.pdf (Accessed 12 July 2017).

Eberhard, A., Leigland, J., and Kolker, J. 2014. South Africa’s Renewable Energy IPP Procurement Program. World Bank Publications. Available online at: http://www.gsb.uct.ac.za/files/ppiafreport.pdf (Accessed 12 July 2017).

Evans, B., Parks, J., and Theobald, K. 2011. Urban wind power and the private sector: community benefits, social acceptance and public engagement. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54(2): 227-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.505829.

IPP Office. 2017. Independent Power Producers Procurement Programme (IPPPP): An overview as at 31 March 2017. Available online at: https://www.ipp-projects.co.za/Publications (Accessed 12 July 2017).

IPP Office. 2016. Independent Power Producers Procurement Programme (IPPPP): An overview as at 30 September 2016. Available online at: https://www.ipp-projects.co.za/Home/Publications. (Accessed 12 July 2017).

Liu, W., Wang, C. and Mol, A. P. 2013. Rural public acceptance of renewable energy deployment: The case of Shandong in China. Applied Energy 102: 1187-1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.057.

Lock, S. J., Smallman, M., Lee, M. and Rydin, Y. 2014. ‘Nuclear energy sounded wonderful 40 years ago’: UK citizen views on CCS. Energy Policy 66: 428-435.

Mandela Institute (MI) and Konrad Adenauer Stiftung (KAS) Foundation. 2014. Report of the scoping workshop on climate change, energy law and the environment, November 2014, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Maruyama, Y., Nishikido, M. and Iida, T. 2007. The rise of community wind power in Japan: Enhanced acceptance through social innovation. Energy Policy 35: 2761-2769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.010.

Nadai, A. 2007. ‘Planning’, ‘sitting’ and the local acceptance of wind power: Some lessons from the French case. Energy Policy 35: 2715-2726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.003.

Ntsebeza, L. 2004. Democratic decentralisation and traditional authority: Dilemmas of land administration in rural South Africa. The European Journal of Development Research 16(1): 71-89.

Pegels, A. 2010. Renewable energy in South Africa: Potentials, barriers and options for support. Energy policy 38(9): 4945-4954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.077.

Rosso-Cerón, A. and Kafarov, V. 2015. Barriers to social acceptance of renewable energy systems in Colombia. Current Opinions in Chemical Engineering 10: 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2015.08.003.

Scarpa, R. and Willis, K. 2010. Willingness-to-pay for renewable energy: Primary and discretionary choice of British households’ for micro-generation technologies. Energy Economics 32(1): 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.004.

Shamsuzzoha, AHM., Grant, A. and Clarke, J. 2012. Implementation of renewable energy in Scottish rural area: A social study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16: 185-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.146.

Strazzera, E., Mura, M., and Contu, D. 2012. Combining choice experiments with psychometric scales to assess the social acceptability of wind energy projects: A latent class approach. Energy Policy 48: 334-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.037.

Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H. and Bondas, T. 2013. Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and health sciences 15 (3): 398-405.

Van Os, H. W., Herber, R. and Scholtens, B. 2014. Not Under Our Back Yards? A case study of social acceptance of the Northern Netherlands CCS initiative. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 923-942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.037.

Wlokas, H. L., Westoby, P. and Soal, S. 2017. Learning from the literature on community development for the implementation of community renewables in South Africa. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa 28(1): 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.037.

Wlokas, H.L., Boyd, A. and Andolfi, M., 2012. Challenges for local community development in private sector-led renewable energy projects in South Africa: An evolving approach. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa 23(4): 46–52.

Wustenhagen, R., Wolsink, M. and Burer, M. J. 2007. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy 35: 2683-2691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001.

Yazdanpanah, M., Komendantova, N., and Ardestani, R. S. 2015. Governance of energy transition in Iran: Investigating public acceptance and willingness to use renewable energy sources through socio-psychological model. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 45: 566-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.002.

Yildiz, Ö. 2014. Financing renewable energy infrastructures via financial citizen participation–The case of Germany. Renewable Energy 68: 677-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.02.038.

Yiridoe, E. K. 2014. Social acceptance of wind energy development and planning in rural communities of Australia: A consumer analysis. Energy Policy 74: 262-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.035.

Zografakis, N., Sifaki, E., Pagalou, M., Nikitaki, G., Psarakis, V. and Tsagarakis, K. P. 2010. Assessment of public acceptance and willingness to pay for renewable energy sources in Crete. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14(3): 1088-1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.009.
Published
2018-03-15
Citation Export
Nkoana, E. (2018). Community acceptance challenges of renewable energy transitions: A tale of two solar parks in Limpopo, South Africa. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, 29(1), 34-40. Retrieved from https://journals.assaf.org.za/jesa/article/view/2540