Analysing scenarios for energy emissions reduction in South Africa

Authors

  • S Moodley University of Pretoria
  • RM Mabugu Centre for Environmental Economics and Policy in Africa University of Pretoria
  • R Hassan Centre for Environmental Economics and Policy in Africa University of Pretoria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3051/2005/v16i4a3079

Keywords:

greenhouse gas, energy emissions, South Africa, policy reforms

Abstract

Global environmental pressure dictates that South Africa reduces its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, while national objectives focus on economic development. South Africa is faced with the dilemma of simultaneously alleviating poverty, reducing unemployment, growing the economy and responding to international pressure to reduce GHG emissions. As a result, policies that promote energy emissions reduction without being harmful to economic growth and national developmental priorities are needed. Environmental fiscal reform presents one such option. The impact of this is still unclear for South Africa, and this paper explores this issue. Energy balance data on energy consumption, energy emissions and input-output data for South Africa are used to assess the economic and environmental effects of environmental reform in the energy sector. Despite the high reduction in energy emissions, a tax on coal is not selected as the best alternative given the high negative impact on the economy. A tax on oil results in a low reduction in energy emissions, which limits its use as an environmental policy. The scenario using a petroleum products tax results in small decreases in economic growth but it has low energy emissions reduction, hence, this alternative is not selected as an option. Energy subsidy reform offers the second highest reduction in real energy emissions and a low decrease in economic growth, and this scenario is therefore recognised as the best option for carbon dioxide reduction in South Africa. The electricity tax offers moderate reductions in real energy emissions and a moderate decrease in economic growth, and therefore, it is deduced that the electricity tax option could be another option for carbon dioxide emissions reduction in South Africa.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allan, G., Hanley, N.D., Swales, J.K. and Turner, K., (2004), An Extension and Application of the Leontief Pollution Model for Waste Generation and Disposal in the Scottish Economy’ – Paper presented to the ESRC Urban and Regional Economic Seminar Group.

Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), (2002), The World Fact Book – South Africa, United States of America, http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/sf.h tml, Accessed 09/12/2002.

Davidson, O., Tyani, L., Afrane-Okesse, Y., (2002), Climate Change, Sustainable Development and Energy: Future Perspectives for South Africa, Energy and Development Research Centre, University of Cape Town.

Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT), (2000), Initial National Communication for South Africa, Pretoria.

Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT), (2004), National Climate Change Response Strategy: Draft V2.2, Pretoria.

Department of Minerals and Energy (DME), (2002), South African National Energy Database, DME Statistics, Pretoria.

Energy Information Administration, (EIA) (2002) Country Analysis brief – South Africa, Department of Energy, United States of America, www.eia.doe.gov/ emeu/cabs/safrica.html, Accessed 17/11/2002.

Energy Research Institute (ERI), (2001), Preliminary Energy Outlook for South Africa, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Cape Town.

Gay, P. and Proops, J., (1993), Carbon dioxide production by the UK economy: an input-output assessment, Applied Energy, Vol. 44, pp 113-130.

Government Communication and Information System (GCIS), (2001), South Africa Yearbook: 2000/2001, Government Printer, Pretoria.

Growth Employment and Redistribution: A macro-economic strategy (GEAR), (1996), www.polity.org.za/html/ govdocs/policy/gear-03.html, Accessed 15/10/2002.

International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), (2001a), Climate Change 2001: Mitigation, Modelling and Cost Assessment, www.ipcc.ch/pub/tar/wg3/309.htm, Accessed 05/09/2002.

Leontief, W., (1936), Quantitative input-output relations in the economic systems of the United States, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 18, pp 105-125.

Leontief, W., (1970), Environmental Repercussions and the Economic Structure: An Input-Output Approach, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 52, pp 262277.

Reconstruction and Development Programme: A Policy Framework (RDP), (1994), www.polity.org.za/html/ govdocs/rdp/rdp1.html, Accessed 15/10/2002.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), (2002), Human Development Report 2002, http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2002/html, Accessed 02/04/2004.

Downloads

Published

2005-11-01

How to Cite

Analysing scenarios for energy emissions reduction in South Africa. (2005). Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, 16(4), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3051/2005/v16i4a3079