Energy price responsiveness in Zimbabwean mining and manufacturing: a disaggregated demand analysis

Authors

  • J C Nkomo Energy Research Centre, University of Cape Town, South Africa
  • H E Goldstein Department of Economics, University of Oslo, Norway

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3051/2006/v17i3a3276

Keywords:

energy share equations, interfuel substitution, own-and cross-price elasticities of demand, taxes

Abstract

This paper examines market signals that enhance efficiency in energy use and the allocation of energy resources, focusing on Zimbabwean manufacturing and mining. We estimate own- and cross -price elasticities of demand to determine how far industrial energy types consumed are substitutable for each other. Our main emphasis is on reducing imported liquid fuel and promoting the country’s coal resources. While liquid fuel claims a huge proportion of the country’s foreign exchange, there is plentiful supply of coal. Coal, however, is environmentally damaging. Elasticity estimates, obtained at a highly disaggregated industrial level, will provide information about the impact of energy taxes on the demand for the different energy types.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berndt, E.R. and Christensen, L.R 1973a. The internal

Structure of Functional Relationships: Separability,

Substitution and Aggregation. Review of Economic

Studies, Vol. 40, July.

Berndt, E.R. and Christensen, L.R 1973b. The Translog

Function and the Substitution of Equipment,

Structure and Labour in US Manufacturing 1929 –

Journal of Econometrics, March.

Binswanger, H.P 1974. The Measurement of Technical

Change Bias with Many Factors of Production.

American Economic Review, 64.

Burgess, D 1975. Duality Theory and Pitfalls in the

Specification of Technologies. Journal of Econometrics,

Vol. 3.

Burgess, D.F 1974. Production Theory and the Derived

Demand for Imports. Journal of International

Economics, 4

Christensen, L.R., Jorgensen, D.W., and Lau, L.T 1971.

Conjugate Duality and the Transcendental

Logarithmic Function. Econometrica, 39.

Christensen, L.R., Jorgensen, D.W., and Lau, L.T 1973.

Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontier.

Review of Economics and Statistics, 55.

Diewert, W.E 1971. An Application of the Shephard

Duality Theorem: A Generalized Leontief Production

Function. Journal of Political Economy, 79.

Diewert, W.E 1973. Separability and a Generalization of

the Cobb-Douglas Cost, Production, and Indirect

Utility Functions. Working Paper, University of British

Columbia.

Diewert, W.E 1974. Applications of Duality Theory, (Ed)

M, Intriligator and D Kendrick, Frontiers of

Quantitative Economics II, Amsterdam, North

Holland.

Field, B.C. and Allen, P.G 1980. Substitution for Energy

in US Manufacturing. Review of Economics and

Statistics, Vol. 62.

Green, H.A.J 1964. Aggregation in Economic Analysis.

An Introductory Survey, Princeton, New Jersey,

Princeton University Press.

Greene, W.H 1993. Econometric Analysis, Macmillan

Publishing Company.

Griffin, J.M 1977. Interfuel Substitution Possibilities: A

Translog Application to Pooled Data. International

Economic Review, 18.

Magnus, J and Woodland, A. D 1980. Interfuel

Substitution Possibilities in Dutch Manufacturing: An

Error Components Approach’. Discussion Paper No.

-39, Department of Economics, University of

British Columbia.

Pindyck, R 1979. The Structure of World Energy

Demand, The MIT Press.

Reddy, N 1974. The Demand for Coal in the United

States: An Econometric Analysis. Proceedings of the

Council of Economics, AIME Annual Meeting, Dallas,

Texas.

Uri, N 1982. The Demand for Energy in the U K. Bulletin

of Economic Research, Vol. 34 No. 1.

Uzawa, H 1962. Production Functions with Constant

Elasticities of Substitution. Review of Economic

Studies.

Downloads

Published

2006-08-01

How to Cite

Nkomo, J. C., & Goldstein, H. E. (2006). Energy price responsiveness in Zimbabwean mining and manufacturing: a disaggregated demand analysis. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, 17(3), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3051/2006/v17i3a3276