A Targeted Outsider's Right to Challenge Local Winding-Up Proceedings PricewaterhouseCoopers v Saad Investments Co Ltd 2014 UKPC 35 (10 November 2014), 2014 1 WLR 4482 (PC)

  • Alastair David Smith University of South Africa
Keywords: Cross-border insolvency, list of persons who may seek stay of winding-up

Abstract

The problem in this case was that the Cayman liquidators, frustrated by the unhelpfulness of the company’s previous auditors in supplying documents and information to help them get to the bottom of the company’s problems, then obtained a winding-up order in Bermuda, the auditors’ home jurisdiction, to have them examined. The auditors appealed successfully to the Privy Council in London to have the winding-up stayed. The facts and the reasoning of this senior court are described, and then critically discussed in this case comment. The auditors were erroneously added to the statutory list of persons who may apply to the court for the stay of the winding-up proceedings. Still, the decision may be supported for the finding that, on the particular facts of the case, the auditors had standing to challenge the winding-up application because the Bermudian court of first instance had no jurisdiction under the relevant statutes and the auditors were the direct targets of the application to wind up the company and examine them. The outcome of the decision carries important implications for the development of company law in England and Bermuda, and for the corresponding company law in South Africa, where the decision is of persuasive authority.

     Google_Scholar_12059.png

Author Biography

Alastair David Smith, University of South Africa
Professor, Department of Mercantile Law, College of Law, University of South Africa.

References

Literature

Bingham Business of Judging
Bingham T The Business of Judging: Selected Essays and Speeches (Oxford University Press Oxford 2000)

Blackman et al Commentary
Blackman MS et al (eds) Commentary on the Companies Act (Juta Cape Town 2011-)

Cardozo Nature of the Judicial Process
Cardozo BN The Nature of the Judicial Process (Yale University Press New Haven 1921)

Cilliers, Loots and Nel Herbstein and Van Winsen
Cilliers AC, Loots C and Nel HC Herbstein and Van Winsen: Civil Practice of the High Courts and the Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa 5th ed (Juta Cape Town 2009)

Cilliers and Luiz 1995 THRHR
Cilliers JB and Luiz SM "The Development and Significance of the Title 'Officer of the Court'" 1995 THRHR 603-612

Harms Civil Procedure
Harms DR Civil Procedure in the Superior Courts (LexisNexis Durban 2015-)

Kunst, Delport and Vorster Henochsberg
Kunst JA, Delport P and Vorster Q Henochsberg on the Companies Act 61 of 1973 5th ed (Juta Cape Town 2011-)

Posner How Judges Think
Posner RA How Judges Think (Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA 2010)

Van Loggerenberg and Bertelsmann Erasmus: Superior Court Practice
Van Loggerenberg DE and Bertelsmann E Erasmus: Superior Court Practice (Juta Cape Town 2016-)

Case law

Aubrey M Cramer Ltd v Wells 1965 4 SA 304 (W)
Brits v Nedbank Ltd 2010 JDR 0495 (GNP)
Campbell v Botha 2009 1 SA 238 (SCA)
De Sousa v Kerr 1978 3 SA 635 (W)
Estate Garlick v Commissioner for Inland Revenue 1934 AD 499
Ex parte Body Corporate of Caroline Court 2001 4 SA 1230 (SCA)
Ex parte Strip Mining (Pty) Ltd: In re Natal Coal Exploration Co Ltd (in Liq) 1999 1 SA 1086 (SCA)
Ex parte The Master of the High Court South Africa (North Gauteng) 2011 5 SA 311 (GNP)
Firestone South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Genticuro AG 1977 4 SA 298 (A)
Grantully (Pvt) Ltd v UDC Ltd 2000 JOL 6396 (ZS)
Herbst v Hessels 1978 2 SA 105 (T)
In re Arthur Average Association 1875 LR 10 Ch App 542
In re Bradford Navigation Company 1870 LR 5 Ch App 600
In re Dover & Deal Railway Co 1854 4 De GM & G 411; 43 ER 567
In re London Marine Insurance Association 1869 LR 8 Eq 176
In re Mid East Trading Ltd 1998 BCC 726 (CA)
Isaacs v Robertson 1985 1 AC 97 (PC)
Jacobs v Baumann 2009 5 SA 432 (SCA)
Kikillus v Susan 1955 2 SA 137 (W)
Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council 1999 2 AC 349
Marais v Munro & Co Ltd 1957 4 SA 53 (EDL)
Minister of Home Affairs v Somali Association of South Africa 2015 3 SA 545 (SCA)
Moolman v Builders & Developers (Pty) Ltd (in Provisional Liquidation): Jooste Intervening 1990 1 SA 954 (A)
Moosa v Siddi-Akoo 2014 JDR 1674 (GP)
Natalse Landboukoöp Bpk v Fick 1982 4 SA 287 (N)
Nyingwa v Moolman 1993 2 SA 508 (Tk)
Oudekraal Estates (Pty) Ltd v City of Cape Town 2004 6 SA 222 (SCA)
PricewaterhouseCoopers v Saad Investments Co Ltd 2014 UKPC 35 (10 November 2014), 2014 1 WLR 4482 (PC)
S v Absalom 1989 3 SA 154 (A)
Singularis Holdings Ltd v PricewaterhouseCoopers (Bermuda) 2014 UKPC 36 (10 November 2014), 2015 2 WLR 971
Southern Pacific Co v Jensen 244 US 205 (1917)
Standard General Insurance Co Ltd v Gutman 1981 2 SA 426 (C)
Theron v United Democratic Front (Western Cape Region) 1984 2 SA 532 (C)
Topol v L S Group Management Services (Pty) Ltd 1988 1 SA 639 (W)
Toto v Special Investigating Unit 2001 1 SA 673 (E)
United Watch & Diamond Co (Pty) Ltd v Disa Hotels Ltd 1972 4 SA 409 (C)
Van der Merwe v Bonaero Park (Edms) Bpk 1998 1 SA 697 (T)
Vidavsky v Body Corporate Sunhill Villas 2005 5 SA 200 (SCA)
Ward v Smit: In re Gurr v Zambia Airways Corporation Ltd 1998 3 SA 175 (SCA)
Weelson v Waterlinx Pool and Spa (Pty) Ltd 2013 JDR 0669 (GSJ)
West Rand Estates Ltd v New Zealand Insurance Co Ltd 1926 AD 173

Legislation

Bermuda
Companies Act 1981
External Companies (Jurisdiction in Actions) Act 1885 (as amended)

South Africa
Companies Act 61 of 1973
Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013
Uniform Rules of Court

Internet sources
Bell 2012 http://tinyurl.com/hlfskxe
Bell K 2012 Dispute Resolution Review (4th Edition) – Bermuda http://tinyurl.com/hlfskxe accessed 24 June 2016

Judicial Committee of the Privy Council 2015 http://tinyurl.com/gvcfnwz
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council 2015 The Jurisdiction of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council http://tinyurl.com/gvcfnwz accessed 24 June 2016

Judicial Committee of the Privy Council 2015 http://tinyurl.com/hg3c2u3
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council 2015 The Role of the JCPC http://tinyurl.com/hg3c2u3 accessed 24 June 2016

Smellie 2015 http://tinyurl.com/zh3d68z
Smellie A 2015 Forum Shopping is Bad; Choice of Forum is Good? The Investment Fund Perspective - 11th INSOL/UNCITRAL/World Bank Judicial Colloquium, 21-22 March 2015 San Francisco http://tinyurl.com/zh3d68z accessed 24 June 2016
Views
  • Abstract 389
  • PDF 47
  • XML 4
Views and downloads are with effect from 11 January 2018
Published
2017-05-17
Section
Case Notes