Databases for stolen art: Progress, prospects and limitations

Authors

  • Christa Roodt University of Glasgow
  • Bernadine Benson University of South Africa (UNISA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3108/2015/i52a26

Abstract

Addressing the illicit trade in stolen works of art and other heritage items is notoriously difficult. Before thefts of heritage items can be recorded, the object in question must be identified as having special significance. The investigation of the circumstances in which such an object was acquired and the enforcement of legal and ethical standards of acquisition become unduly complicated in the absence of a comprehensive national inventory of museum holdings and of a database of stolen art and cultural objects. This article considers the development of inventories and databases in South Africa and elsewhere. We argue that cross-sectoral cooperation in sharing databases needs to improve significantly in order to boost compliance with due diligence standards. To help restore the credibility of the trade in art and cultural objects, the South African Heritage Resources Information System site must be endorsed as the centralised database for heritage crime. This would provide ready access to databases, helping art market participants, law enforcement officers and customs officials in the investigation of stolen art works.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2015-07-01

Issue

Section

Research articles