Twenty years of punishment (and democracy) in South Africa: The pitfalls of governing crime through the community
This article examines how the ideology of â€˜communityâ€™ is deployed to govern crime in South Africa, both by marginalised black communities and by the government. Although the turn to â€˜communityâ€™ started under the National Party government in the late 1970s, there is no doubt that as a site, technology, discourse, ideology and form of governance, â€˜communityâ€™ has become entrenched in the post-1994 era. Utilising empirical data drawn from ethnographic research on vigilantism in Khayelitsha, as well as archival materials in respect of ANC policies and practices before it became the governing party, I argue that rallying â€˜communitiesâ€™ around crimeÂ combatting has the potential to unleash violent technologies in the quest for â€˜ethicsâ€™ and â€˜moralityâ€™. When community members unite against an outsider they are bonded for an intense moment in a way that masks the very real problems that tear the community apart. Because violent punishment is one of theÂ consequences of the stateâ€™s turn towards democratic localism, we should question the way in which the â€˜communityâ€™ is deployed as a tool of crime prevention, and subject it to rigorous scrutiny.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
SACQ is licenced under a creative commons licence (CC BY) that allows others to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long a they give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
Copyright for articles published is vested equally between the author/s, the Institute for Security Studies and the Centre of Criminology (UCT).