‘PALE FACE’/ ‘POINTY FACE’: SA criminology in denial

  • Sarah Henkeman* University of the Western Cape (UWC).
Keywords: Criminology, South Africa

Abstract

This paper responds to key aspects of Bill Dixon’s article, Understanding ‘Pointy Face’: What is criminology for? It suggests that criminology should unambiguously be ‘for’ social justice in South Africa’s transhistorically unequal context. South African prison statistics are used as a conceptual shortcut to briefly highlight racialised constructions of crime, the criminal and the criminologist. A trans-disciplinary conceptual approach, as a more socially just way to understand violent crime in South Africa, is proposed. A methodological framework,which draws on the notion of cultural-structural-direct violenceand intersectional theory,is presented. These extend Bill Dixon’s call for criminology to include history, structure, human psyche and biography5 and resonates with Biko Agozino’s call for a ‘counter-colonial’ criminology.The paper ends by returning the Eurocentric gaze of most South African criminologists, calling them out on their denial about trans-historical violence that implicates ‘Pale Face’ in the violence of ‘Pointy Face’.

Author Biography

Sarah Henkeman*, University of the Western Cape (UWC).
Social Law Project
Views
  • Abstract 105
  • PDF 45
Views and downloads are with effect from 11 January 2018
Published
2013-03-08
Section
Research articles