After Glenister: The case for a new dedicated agency

  • Christopher Reeves Council for the Advancement of the South African Constitution and University of Cape Town.
Keywords: constitution, SAPS, Hawks, Directorate of Priority Crime Investigation, independance, corruption,

Abstract

Last year, the Constitutional Court held that the state has an obligation to establish and maintain an independent anti-corruption entity and that the Directorate of Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI), which is located within the South African Police Service (SAPS), does not have an adequate degree of independence. A Bill has recently been introduced in the National Assembly to address the issues raised in the judgment. In accordance with the proposed amendments, the DPCI would remain part of the SAPS. This article argues that this is a mistake and that a wholly separate anti-corruption entity should be established. It also examines the legal and institutional framework required to establish an effective, specialised anti-corruption entity through a comparative analysis of other anti-corruption agencies.

Author Biography

Christopher Reeves, Council for the Advancement of the South African Constitution and University of Cape Town.
Democratic Governance and Rights Unit
Views
  • Abstract 80
  • PDF 43
Views and downloads are with effect from 11 January 2018
Published
2012-03-08
Section
Research articles