Water Security and Judicial and Administrative Confusion in South Africa: The Trustees of the Time Being of the Lucas Scheepers Trust, IT 633/96 and Others v MEC for the Department of Water Affairs, Gauteng and Others Case nr 40514/2013

Authors

  • Ed Couzens University of Sydney
  • Devarasi Maduramuthu University of KwaZulu-Natal
  • Adrian Bellengère University of KwaZulu-Natal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2017/v20i0a1686

Keywords:

Escarpment Environment Protection Group Case, National Water Act 36 of 1998, Trustees of the Time Being of the Lucas Scheepers Trust Case, Water Tribunal

Abstract

One of the gravest constraints which South Africa faces in its efforts to promote development and to lift much of its population out of poverty is the relative scarcity of its water. Significant changes were made to South Africa’s water law in the 1990s, especially with the promulgation of the National Water Act 36 of 1998. In terms of this Act a Water Tribunal was created which ought to have enhanced water security and to have provided a settled forum to adjudicate disputes and to assist in developing the jurisprudence of water law. Instead the Tribunal appears to have created almost as much confusion as clarity before it was dissolved in much uncertainty over whether it would continue in existence or not. A recent judgment in the Gauteng High Court (The Trustees of the Time Being of the Lucas Scheepers Trust, IT 633/96 and Others v MEC for the Department of Water Affairs, Gauteng and Others) has created uncertainty by departing from the precedent of a relatively recent judgment in the North Gauteng High Court (Escarpment Environment Protection Group and Wonderfontein Community Association v Department of Water Affairs and Xstrata Alloys (Pty) Ltd and The Water Tribunal). In the context of the uncertainty created by the falling into desuetude, at least between 2011 and 2016, of the Water Tribunal, and contradictory indications from National Government, litigants have been forced to seek other fora for remedies. On occasion, courts have been sympathetic and given sensitive judgments – on occasion they have not. Against this background of inconsistent jurisprudence, it is important that there be greater clarity of rights, duties and institutions, and that institutions become settled as soon as possible so that a consistent jurisprudence can begin to emerge in the water rights field. While the situation stabilizes, which it is hoped that it will soon begin to do, it is suggested that both courts and government act with circumspection in considering applications concerning water use rights; and be sensitive of the current uncertain circumstances when making decisions. The difficulties of ensuring water security and administrative fairness in South Africa demand nothing less.

    Google_Scholar_117.png

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Literature

Couzens and Bellengère 2012 SAJELP

Couzens E and Bellengère A "Wading Through Muddy Judicial and Administrative Waters: Makhanya NO v Goede Wellington Boerdery (Pty) Ltd and Another [2013] 1 All SA 526 (SCA) " 2012 SAJELP 137-153

Hoexter 2012 Administrative Law

Hoexter C Administrative Law in South Africa 2nd ed (Juta Cape Town 2012)

Kidd 2011 Environmental Law

Kidd M Environmental Law 2nd ed (Juta Cape Town 2011)

Kidd 2012 SAJELP

Kidd M "Fairness Floating Down the Stream? The Water Tribunal and Administrative Justice" 2012 SAJELP 25-50

Stewart and Horsten 2009 SAPR/PL

Stewart L and Horsten D "The Role of Sustainability in the Adjudication of the Right of Access to Adequate Water" 2009 SAPR/PL 486-505

Thompson 2006 Water Law

Thompson H Water Law: A Practical Approach to Resource management and the Provision of Services (Juta Cape Town 2006)

Case law

Escarpment Environment Protection Group and Wonderfontein Community Association v Department of Water Affairs and Xstrata Alloys (Pty) Ltd and The Water Tribunal, North Gauteng High Court, case no. A665/11; 4535/11. Judgment delivered on 20 November 2013.

Escarpment v DWA and Exxaro

Escarpment Environment Protection Group and Wonderfontein Community Association v Department of Water Affairs and Exxaro Coal Case no. WT03/06/2010, appeal ruling 21/07/2011, available at

https://www.dwaf.gov.za/WaterTribunal/cases/EscarpmentWonderfontein.pdf.

Escarpment v DWA and Werm

Escarpment Environment Protection Group and Langkloof Environmental Committee v Department of Water Affairs and Werm Mining (Pty) Ltd Case no. WT 25/11/2009, available at

https://www.dwaf.gov.za/WaterTribunal/cases/EscarpmentLangkloof2.pdf, appeal ruling 21/07/2011, available at

https://www.dwaf.gov.za/WaterTribunal/cases/EscarpmentWonderfontein.pdf;

condonation ruling 04/06/2010, available at

https://www.dwaf.gov.za/WaterTribunal/cases/EscarpmentLangkloof.pdf;

Escarpment v DWA and Xstrata

Escarpment Environment Protection Group and Langkloof Environmental Committee v Department of Water Affairs and Xstrata South Africa (Pty) Ltd Case no. WT 2411/2009, appeal ruling 22/07/2011, available at

https://www.dwaf.gov.za/WaterTribunal/cases/EscarpmentWonderfonteinCommunity.pdf.

The Federation for Sustainable Development v The Department of Water Affairs and Others WT 08/03/2011;

appeal ruling 20/12/2011, available at

https://www.dwaf.gov.za/WaterTribunal/cases/FedSustainableEnvironment.pdf.

Makhanya N.O. and Another v Goede Wellington Boerdery [2013] 1 All SA 526 (SCA).

Koyabe v Minister of Home Affairs 2010 (4) SA 327 (CC).

The Trustees of the Time Being of the Lucas Scheepers Trust, IT 633/96 and Others v MEC for the Department of Water Affairs, Gauteng and Others Case nr 40514/2013, (17 April 2015)

Zondi v MEC for Traditional and Local Government Affairs and Others 2005 (3) SA 589 (CC)]

Legislation

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

National Water Act 36 of 1998

Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000

Water Act 54 of 1956

Internet sources

Blaine 2012 Business Day Live

S Blaine “Water Tribunal suspended after losing Chairman” Business Day Live 13 September 2012, http://www.bdlive.co.za/national/2012/09/13/water-tribunal-suspended-after-losing-chairman accessed 1-16 March 2016.

DWS August 2015 Progress Report

Department of Water & Sanitation, “Progress Report on water licences & their implications for economic development in South Africa: Department of Water & Sanitation briefing”, 5 August 2015, https://pmg.org.za/committee-meeting/21247/.

Furter 2014 SA Water Amendment Bill

E Furter “SA Water Amendment Bill scraps water law tribunal” Sheqafrica.com

September 2014, http://sheqafrica.com/water-law/ accessed 1-16 March 2016.

Notice 456 of 2014

Nominations for chairperson of the Water Tribunal, General Notices, Notice 456 of 2014, Government Gazette No. 37766, 24 June 2014.

Parliamentary Monitoring Group 2015 Question 1756

Parliamentary Monitoring Group “Water and Sanitation: Questions to the Minister”, Question no. 1756, date of publication in internal question paper: 15 May 2015, https://pmg.org.za/question_reply/543/. Available also at

https://www.dwa.gov.za/communications/Q&A/2015/NA%201756.pdf.

Parliamentary Monitoring Group 2015 Question 2602

Parliamentary Monitoring Group “Water and Sanitation: Questions to the Minister”, Question no. 1756, date of publication in internal question paper: 24 July 2015.

Available also at

https://www.dwa.gov.za/communications/Q&A/2015/NA%202602.pdf.

Tancott 2014 Infrastructure

G Tancott “Lobby groups’ water challenges fall on deaf ears” Infrastructure News 7 January 2014, http://www.infrastructurene.ws/2014/01/07/lobby-groups-water-challenges-fall-on-deaf-ears/ accessed 1-16 March 2016.

Tempelhoff 2015 Die Beeld

E Tempelhoff, ‘Watertribunaal inderhaas aangestel’ Die Beeld 24 June 2015, http://www.netwerk24.com/Nuus/Omgewing/Watertribunaal-inderhaas-aangestel-20150624?mobile=true accessed 26 February-18 June 2016.

UNDESA 2014 Water for Life

UNDESA, ‘International Decade for Action “WATER FOR LIFE” 2005-2015’ 24 November 2014, http://www.un.org/waterforlifedecade/scarcity.shtml accessed 1-16 March 2016.

Water Tribunal Webpage, About Us

‘About Us’, Water Tribunal Webpage, Department of Water & Sanitation of the Republic of South Africa, https://www.dwaf.gov.za/WaterTribunal/About.aspx accessed 1-16 March 2016.

Water Tribunal Webpage, Case Decisions

‘Case Decisions’, Water Tribunal Webpage, Department of Water & Sanitation of the Republic of South Africa, https://www.dwaf.gov.za/WaterTribunal/Cases.aspx accessed 1-16 March 2016.

Water Tribunal Webpage, Home

‘Home’, Water Tribunal Webpage, Department of Water & Sanitation of the Republic of South Africa, https://www.dwaf.gov.za/WaterTribunal/Default.aspx accessed 1-16 March 2016.

Published

20-01-2017

How to Cite

Couzens, E., Maduramuthu, D., & Bellengère, A. (2017). Water Security and Judicial and Administrative Confusion in South Africa: The Trustees of the Time Being of the Lucas Scheepers Trust, IT 633/96 and Others v MEC for the Department of Water Affairs, Gauteng and Others Case nr 40514/2013. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 20, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2017/v20i0a1686

Issue

Section

Special Edition: Water Security