The Application and Interpretation by South African Courts of General Renvoi Clauses in South African Double Taxation Agreements

Keywords: Article 3(2), general renvoi clauses, ITC 789, Baldwins, Tradehold

Abstract

General renvoi clauses in DTAs based on article 3(2) of the OECD MTC provide that an undefined term in a DTA shall have the meaning that it has in the domestic law of the contracting state applying the DTA unless the context otherwise requires. All South African DTAs include such a clause.

Many interpretational issues remain with regard to the application and interpretation of general renvoi clauses. This article considers four of these issues in the light of South African cases in which general renvoi clauses were referred to. The following cases are considered: ITC 789 (1954) 19 SATC 434, Baldwins (South Africa) Ltd v Commissioner for Inland Revenue (1961) 24 SATC 270 and Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service v Tradehold Ltd 2012 3 All SA 15 (SCA).

The first of the issues considered in the article is relevant in those cases where a DTA includes a general renvoi clause based on the pre-1995 version of article 3(2) and where amendments were made to a relevant domestic meaning after the conclusion of the particular DTA. These clauses do not expressly state whether the relevant domestic meaning is the domestic meaning existing at the time of the conclusion of the DTA, or at the time of the application of the DTA.

The second issue arises if the expression used in the domestic law is not identical to the undefined treaty term. The question is whether the expression in the domestic law can be used to give meaning to the treaty term under the general renvoi clause.

Another interpretational issue considered in the article concerns deeming provisions in the domestic law. The issue is whether a meaning that a term is deemed to have under a provision in domestic legislation can be used under the general renvoi clause to give meaning to the undefined term in the DTA.

The last issue deals with the meaning of the phrase "unless the context otherwise requires". The question raised is whether this phrase means that the domestic meaning should be given only as a "last resort", or whether it should apply unless "reasonably strong" arguments to the contrary are made

Author Biography

Enelia Jansen van Rensburg, University of Stellenbosch

Senior Lecturer, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa.

References

Anonymous "Editorial Note to C: SARS v Tradehold Ltd" 2012 The Taxpayer 92-95
Arnold BJ "Time Thresholds in Tax Treaties" 2008 BFIT 218-231
Arnold BJ "The Interpretation of Tax Treaties: Myth and Reality" 2010 BFIT 1-15
Arnold BJ "International - Tax Treaty Case Law News" 2012 BFIT 481-485
Avery Jones JF "HMRC v Fowler: More on Divers" 2017 BTR 385-398
Avery Jones JF "Fowler v HMRC: Divers yet Again" 2019 BTR 22-25
Avery Jones JF "The Interaction between Tax Treaty Provisions and Domestic Law" in Maisto G (ed) Tax Treaties and Domestic Law (IBFD Amsterdam 2006) 123-160
Avery Jones JF "Treaty Interpretation" in Vann R (ed) Global Tax Treaty Commentaries (IBFD Amsterdam 2019)
Avery Jones and Hattingh "Fowler v HMRC: Divers and the Dangers of Deeming" 2016 BTR 417-434
Avery Jones JF et al "The Interpretation of Tax Treaties with Particular Reference to Article 3(2) of the OECD Model - I" 1984 BTR 14-54
Avery Jones JF et al "The Interpretation of Tax Treaties with Particular Reference to Article 3(2) of the OECD Model - II" 1984 BTR 90-108
Baker P Double Taxation Conventions (Sweet & Maxwell London 2014)
Brilman L "The Effect of Taxation on Business Mobility in the European Union: The Case of the Netherlands" 2015 BFIT 442-449
Burt K "The OECD Commentaries: On what Legal Basis and to what Extent are they Relevant to Tax Treaty Interpretation" 2017 Business Tax & Company Law Quarterly 5-28
Castro RT "When does 'the Context Otherwise Require' in Article 3 of the OECD Model Convention?" 2014 Intertax 709-719
Chand V "Exit Charges for Migrating Individuals and Companies: Comparative and Tax Treaty Analysis" 2013 BFIT 1-20
Classen LG "The Exit Tax Consequences of the Migration of Companies from South Africa: Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service v Tradehold Ltd: Case Note" 2013 SA Merc LJ 387-403
De Broe L International Tax Planning and Prevention of Abuse: A Study under Domestic Tax Law, Tax Treaties and EC Law in Relation to Conduit and Base Companies (IBFD Amsterdam 2007)
De Broe L "The Tax Treatment of Transfer of Residence by Individuals - General Report" in IFA Cahiers de Droit Fiscal International Vol 87b (IBFD Amsterdam 2002) 19-78
De Pietro C "Tax Treaty Override and the Need for Coordination between Legal Systems: Safeguarding the Effectiveness of International Law" 2015 World Tax J 73-97
Déry J and Ward DA "Interpretation of Double Taxation Conventions - Canada" in IFA Cahiers De Droit Fiscal International Vol 78a (IBFD Amsterdam 1993) 259-293
Du Plessis I "Some Thoughts on the Interpretation of Tax Treaties in South Africa" 2012 SA Merc LJ 31-52
Du Plessis I "The Interpretation of Double Taxation Agreements: A Comparative Evaluation of Recent South African Case Law" 2016 TSAR 484-499
Du Plessis I A South African Perspective on Some Critical Issues Regarding the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital, with Special Emphasis on its Application to Trusts (LLD-dissertation University of Stellenbosch 2014)
Du Toit CP Beneficial Ownership of Royalties in Bilateral Tax Treaties (IBFD Amsterdam 1999)
Du Toit C and Hattingh J "Beneficial Ownership and Double Tax Conventions" in De Koker AP and Brincker E (eds) Silke on International Tax (LexisNexis Durban 2019) chapter 9
Edwardes-Ker M Tax Treaty Interpretation (PhD-dissertation University of London 1994)
Engelen FA Interpretation of Tax Treaties under International Law (IBFD Amsterdam 2004)
Eskinazi R "Interpretation of Double Taxation Conventions - South Africa" in IFA Cahiers De Droit Fiscal International Vol 78a (IBFD Amsterdam 1993) 545-558
Gutuza T "Taxing the Partner of a Foreign Partnership: Notes" 2008 SALJ 514-520
Gutuza T "Dual Residence and the Proviso: Where was Tradehold Resident?" 2014 SA Merc LJ 543-559
Gutuza T "Tax Treaties, the Income Tax Act and the Constitution - Trump or Reconcile" 2016 SA Merc LJ 480-507
Hattingh J "South Africa" in Brauner Y and Pistone P (eds) BRICS and the Emergence of International Tax Coordination (IBFD Amsterdam 2015) 231-270
Kandev MN "Tax Treaty Interpretation: Determining Domestic Meaning under Article 3(2) of the OECD Model" 2007 Can Tax J 31-71
Linderfalk U and Hilling M "The Use of OECD Commentaries as Interpretative Aids: The Static/Ambulatory-Approaches Debate Considered from the Perspective of International Law" 2015 Nord Tax J 34-59
Mazansky E "South Africa's Exit Charge Overridden by the Luxembourg-South Africa Income and Capital Tax Treaty (1998)" 2012 BFIT 374-376
Mooij H "Fowler v HMRC: An Outside View" 2019 BTR 25-30
Olivier L and Honiball M International Tax: A South African Perspective 5th ed (SiberInk Cape Town 2011)
Pijl H "The Theory of the Interpretation of Tax Treaties, with Reference to Dutch Practice" 1997 BFIT 539-546
Pötgens F Income from International Private Employment: An Analysis of Article 15 of the OECD Model (IBFD Amsterdam 2007)
Rust A "Article 3(2) OECD and UN MC" in Reimer E and Rust A (eds) Klaus Vogel on Double Taxation Conventions Volume I (Kluwer Law International Alphen aan de Rijn 2015) 206-215
Seiler M "Exit Taxation Arising from a Deemed Disposal of Shares" 2013 BFIT 580-583
Simontacchi S Taxation of Capital Gains under the OECD Model Convention: With Special Regard to Immovable Property (Kluwer International Law Alphen aan den Rijn 2007)
Van der Bruggen E "Unless the Vienna Convention otherwise Requires: Notes on the Relationship between Article 3(2) of the OECD Model Tax Convention and Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties" 2003 Euro Tax 142-156
Wattel PJ and Marres O "Characterization of Fictitious Income under OECD-Patterned Tax Treaties" 2003 Euro Tax 66-79
Wattel PJ and Marres O "The Legal Status of the OECD Commentary and Static or Ambulatory Interpretation of Tax Treaties" 2003 Euro Tax 222-235
R v Melford Development Inc 82 DTC 6281
Baldwins (South Africa) Ltd v Commissioner for Inland Revenue 1961 24 SATC 270
Canca v Mount Frere Municipality 1984 2 SA 830 (Tk)
Clutchco (Pty) Ltd v Davis 2005 3 SA 486 (SCA)
Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service v Tradehold Ltd 2012 3 All SA 15 (SCA)
Cronje v Paul Els Investments (Pty) Ltd 1982 2 SA 179 (T)
Govindasamy v Indian Immigration Trust Board Natal 1918 AD 633
Grobler v Trustee Estate De Beer 1915 AD 265
ITC 789 1954 19 SATC 434
ITC 1848 2010 73 SATC 170
ITC 1878 2015 77 SATC 349
Minister of Mineral Resources v Sishen Iron Ore Co (Pty) Ltd 2014 2 SA 603 (CC)
SATAWU v Garvas 2013 1 SA 83 (CC)
Decision by the Hoge Raad (20 February 2009) 42701 BNB 2009/260
Decision by the Hoge Raad (20 February 2009) 43760 BNB 2009/261
Decision by the Hoge Raad (20 February 2009) 07/12314 BNB 2009/262
Ostime (Inspector of Taxes) v Australian Mutual Provident Society [1960] AC 459
Fowler v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2018] EWCA Civ 2544
Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996
Housing Development Schemes for Retired Persons Act 65 of 1988
Income Tax Act 31 of 1941
Income Tax Act 58 of 1962
Property Time-Sharing Control Act 75 of 1983
Taxation Laws Amendment Act 5 of 2001
Wet op de inkomstenbelasting 2001
OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and Capital (latest revision 2017)
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development 1991 The 183 Day Rule: Some Problems of Application and Interpretation http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264239081-102-en accessed 15 December 2015
Views
  • Abstract 45
  • pdf 24
  • xml 1
  • epub 36
Views and downloads are with effect from 11 January 2018
Published
2019-11-20
Section
Articles