The Life and Times of Textualism in South Africa

Keywords: Interpretation, contextualism, statutory interpretation, history, methods of interpretation, textualism, intentionalism, Endumeni

Abstract

This paper analyses the dominant approaches to statutory interpretation through a historical lens. It argues that for most of South Africa's history the methods of interpretation were twisted in order to give effect to the intentions of the legislature. This approach to interpretation has now been discarded into the waste bin of history, and intentionalism has been replaced with contextualism. Or so we are told. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeal in Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund v Endumeni Municipality 2012 4 SA 593 (SCA) has been hailed as the new, settled approach to interpretation, with the Constitutional Court endorsing Endumeni on numerous occasions. But it appears from both the judgments of the Constitutional Court and those of other Courts that intentionalism is not yet dead. This paper argues that the reason for this is because Endumeni has not provided clarity to the process of interpretation that it proclaims to do.

Author Biography

Kessler Perumalsamy, University of the Western Cape

Lecturer, Department of Public Law and Jurisprudence, University of the Western Cape, South Africa

Advocate of the High Court of South Africa

Pupil Member, Cape Bar

 

References

Baker JH An Introduction to English Legal History 4th ed (Butterworths London 2002)
Cameron E "Legal Chauvinism, Executive-mindedness and Justice LC Steyn's Impact on South African Law" 1982 SALJ 38-75
Cowen DV "The Interpretation of Statutes and the Concept of the Intention of the Legislature" 1980 THRHR 374-399
Cowen DV "Prolegomenon to a Restatement of the Principles of Statutory Interpretation" in Cowen S (ed) Cowen on Law: Selected Essays (Juta Cape Town 2008) 97-142
Davis D Democracy and Deliberation (Juta Cape Town 1999)
Devenish GE Interpretation of Statutes (Juta Cape Town 1992)
Devenish GE "Interpretation 'From the Bowels of the Act': An Essential Methodology for Unqualified Contextual Interpretation" 1989 SALJ 68-82
Devenish GE "Fundamental Concepts and the Historical Roots of the Interpretation of Statutes in South Africa" 1991 De Jure 77-93
Du Plessis L Re-interpretation of Statutes (LexisNexis Durban 2007)
Fagan A "Section 39(2) and Political Integrity" 2004 Acta Juridica 117-137
Fagan A "The Secondary Role of the Spirit, Purport and Objects of the Bill of Rights in the Common Law's Development" 2010 SALJ 611-627
Fuller L "Positivism and Fidelity to the Law: A Reply to Professor Hart" 1958 Harv L Rev 630-672
Hart HLA The Concept of Law (Clarendon Press Oxford 1961)
Hart HLA Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford University Press Oxford 1983)
Hart HLA "Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals" 1958 Harv L Rev 593-629
Le Roux W and Perumalsamy K Constitutional Perspectives on Statutory Interpretation (Oxford University Press Oxford forthcoming 2019)
Popkin W Statutes in Court: The History of Statutory Interpretation (Duke University Press Durham 1999)
Schauer F "A Critical Guide to Vehicles in the Park" 2008 NYU L Rev 1109-1134
Steyn LC Die Uitleg van Wette (Juta Cape Town 1963)
Van der Merwe D Brown v Leyds: Who has the King's Voice? (LexisNexis Durban 2017)
Waldron J The Dignity of Legislation (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 1999)
AfriForum v University of the Free State 2018 2 SA 185 (CC)
Aumeye's Case (1305) YB 33-5 Edw I
Belyng v Anon (1312) B & M 52
Bothma-Bato Transport (Edms) Bpk v S Bothma & Seun Transport 2014 2 SA 494 (SCA)
CSARS v Daikin Air Conditioning South Africa (Pty) Ltd 80 SATC 330
Dadoo v Krugersdorp Municipality 1920 AD 530
De Villiers v Cape Law Society 1937 CPD 428
De Villiers v The Cape, Divisional Council 1875 Buchanan 1980 50
Democratic Alliance v African National Congress 2015 2 SA 232 (CC)
Department of Land Affairs v Goedgelegen Tropical Fruits (Pty) Ltd 2007 10 BCLR 1027 (CC)
Dr Bonham's Case (1610) 8 Co Rep 114
Ebrahim v Minister of the Interior 1977 1 SA 665 (AD)
Grey v Pearson 6 H L Cas 106
Hess v The State (1895) 2 ORC 112
Hleka v Johannesburg City Council 1949 2 SA 842 (A)
Jaga v Donges 1950 4 SA 653 (A)
Jordaan v Tshwane City and Four Similar Cases 2017 2 SA 295 (GP)
KwaZulu Natal Joint Liaison Committee v MEC Department of Education, KwaZulu Natal 2013 4 SA 262 (CC)
Magor and St Mellons RDC v Newport BC [1952] AC 189
Marshall v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service 2018 7 BCLR 830 (CC)
Mathiba v Moschke 1920 AD 354
Mavromati v Union Exploration Import (Pty) Ltd 1949 4 SA 917 (AD)
Mazibuko v City of Johannesburg 2010 4 SA 1 (CC)
Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund v Endumeni Municipality 2012 4 SA 593 (SCA)
National Credit Regulator v Opperman 2013 2 SA 1 (CC)
Novaris South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Maphil Trading (Pty) Ltd 2016 1 SA 518 (SCA)
Olitzki Property Holdings v State Tender Board 2001 3 SA 1247 (SCA)
Principle Immigration Officer v Hawabu 1936 AD 26
Public Carriers Association v Toll Road Concessionaries (Pty) Ltd 1990 1 SA 925 (A)
Public Servants Association v Head of Department of Health, Gauteng 2018 2 SA 365 (CC)
R v Westenraad 1941 OPD 103
Reezen Ltd v Excellerate Holdings Ltd 2018 6 SA 571 (GJ)
Rex v Detody 1926 AD 198
S v Nteta 2016 2 SACR 641 (WCC)
Seluka v Suskin and Salkow 1912 TPD 257
Stellenbosch Farmers' Winery Ltd v Distillers Corporation SA Ltd 1962 1 All SA 485 (A)
Swart v Cape Fabrix (Pty) Ltd 1979 1 SA 195 (A)
Trinity Asset Management (Pty) Ltd v Grindstone Investments 132 (Pty) Ltd 2018 1 SA 94 (CC)
Tshwane City v Mitchell 2016 3 SA 231 (SCA)
Van der Westhuizen v Arnold 2002 6 SA 453 (SCA)
Venter v Rex 1907 TS 910
Spigelman JJ 2005 The Principle of Legality and the Clear Statement Principle http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/supreme_court/ll_sc.nsf/vwPrint1/SCO_speech_spigelman180 accessed 10 July 2019
Views
  • Abstract 40
  • pdf 24
  • xml 2
  • epub 6
Views and downloads are with effect from 11 January 2018
Published
2019-11-06
Section
Special Edition: Legal Interpretation after Endumeni