The omission of the opt-out clause: The revised (and improved?) Traditional Courts Bill 2017

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3108/2020/vn69a7821

Abstract

The Traditional Courts Bill B1B-2017 omits the opt-out clause and the notion that engagement with traditional courts is on a voluntary and consensual basis – a long-standing sticky point with traditional leaders. Under the Bill, individuals are bound to attend a traditional court when summoned and cannot opt-out of the system, which conflicts starkly with the notion of customary law as a voluntary and consensual system of law. This article argues that compelling individuals to attend a traditional court may be unconstitutional for unjustifiably infringing the rights to culture, a fair trial and equality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Fatima Osman, University of Cape Town

Senior Lecturer in the Department of Private Law at the University of Cape Town.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-24

Issue

Section

Research articles