Embracing new technology, with caution





peeling, repeatable, dexterity


Dental manufacturers frequently present clinicians with new “cutting edge” materials, devices or technology. These usually come with great promise for bettering the status quo in their practices, and of putting them ahead of their colleagues in the market place. However before succumbing to the advertorial hype, and abandoning their old practices, materials or equipment, practitioners need to
evaluate the new offering against the “gold standard” if one exists. This entails comparing it to “the benchmark” practice/ product that is routinely used under reasonable conditions, and answering a number of clinically and scientifically pertinent questions. If they are then confident it has beenthrough extensive trials, the results have been analysed with appropriate tests by independent investigators, and the reporting thereof is accurate, reliable, repeatable, sensitive, specific and clinically applicable, they may consider making practice changes. While it is admirable for clinicians to be open minded and willing to embrace and adapt to modern
technology, this should only be done if the change has been proven superior to reliable routine practices. It is incumbent on all practitioners to keep abreast of current trends through the many platforms available. They should also strive towards being life-long learners who are curious, open minded, flexible, willing to learn new skills, and open to adapting their work to embrace advances. This will hopefully lead to practitioners having more fruitful careers, and equip them to provide the best possible service and care to their patients.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...


Versi, E. “Gold standard” is it an appropriate term? BMJ. 1992:305(6846)”187 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.305.6846.187-b

Cardosa RJR, Pereira LM, Iversen MD & Ramos AL. What is gold standard and what is ground truth? Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 Sep-Oct; 19(5): 27–30.doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.5.027-030.ebo DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.5.027-030.ebo

Edmonds WA, Kennedy TD. An Applied Guide to Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods: Sage Publications; 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802779

Vijayananthan A, Nawawi O. The Importance of Good Clinical Practice Guidelines and its Role in Clinical Trials. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2008;4(1):e5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2349/biij.4.1.e5

South African Good Clinical Practice: Clinical Trial Guidelines Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Health [Internet]. 2020 [3:[Available from: https://www.sahpra.org.za/clinical-trials/.

World Health O. Handbook for Good Clinical Research Practice (GCP): Guidance for Implementation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.

Sykes LM,Evans WG & Doolabh R. How do they know what they know? Learning to be critical when reading scientific papers. SADJ: 2017:Vol 72: 8:

Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Clin Chem. 2003;49:1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1373/49.1.1




How to Cite

Sykes, L., & Bookhan, V. (2023). Embracing new technology, with caution. South African Dental Journal, 78(01), 62–64. https://doi.org/10.17159/sadj.v78i01.15712

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>