Measuring tongue strength in adults after partial glossectomy: a review

Authors

  • Wade Shaw Psychology, MBBCh V, University of the Witwatersrand
  • Azra Ismail University of the Witwatersrand
  • Baka Jolyne Vangu University of the Witwatersrand
  • Deen Kimmie University of the Witwatersrand
  • Saijal Naidoo University of the Witwatersrand
  • Rosy Katulondi University of the Witwatersrand
  • Nkoe Madikoa University of the Witwatersrand
  • Zarreen Cassim MA Audiology, University of the Witwatersrand
  • Nadir Kana University of the Witwatersrand
  • Shivesh Maharaj Academic Head, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of the Witwatersrand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/sadj.v78i05.16892

Keywords:

Swallowing, dysphagia, tongue, oral pathology, mouth, cancer, head and neck

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to present a scoping review of the measurements of tongue strength available, particularly in adult patients, following partial glossectomy. The subsequent impact on functionality and quality of life were also explored.

Materials and methods
This study used a scoping review and the study selection comprised two stages of screening: the review of the title and abstract followed by a full-text review. During the first stage of screening, the title and abstracts of all retrieved references were reviewed against the predetermined inclusion criteria. In the second stage of screening, all studies were reviewed at full-text level, utilising the Full-Text Screening Relevance measure. A total of 20 articles were reviewed as they met the inclusion criteria

Results
The study found that subjective and quality-of-life measures may still be useful in measuring tongue strength in developing contexts as they closely approximate objective measures and are reliable as an interim measure. However, there is still a need for the development of other objective measures, should funding be available.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Shivesh Maharaj, Academic Head, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of the Witwatersrand




References

Vincent A, Kohlert S, Lee TS, Inman J, Ducic Y. Free-flap reconstruction of the tongue. In Seminars in plastic surgery 2019 Feb (Vol. 33, No. 01, pp. 038-045). Thieme Medical Publishers (1) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1677789

Dzioba A, Aalto D, Papadopoulos-Nydam G, Seikaly H, Rieger J, Wolfaardt J, Laine J (2017). Functional and quality of life outcomes after partial glossectomy: A multi-institutional longitudinal study of the head and neck research network. Journal of Otolaryngology - Head DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-017-0236-9

and Neck Surgery Vol. 46

Windon MJ, D’Souza G, Faraji F, Troy T, Koch WM, Gourin CG, Kiess AP, Pitman KT, Eisele DW, Fakhry C. Priorities, concerns, and regret among patients with head and neck cancer. Cancer. 2019 Apr 15;125(8):1281-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31920

Babin E, Sigston E, Hitier M, Dehesdin D, Marie JP, Choussy O (2008). Quality of life in head and neck cancers patients: Predictive factors, functional and psychosocial outcome. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Vol. 265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-007-0561-0

Kazi R, Prasad V, Venkitaraman R, Nutting C, Clarke P, Rhys-Evans P, Harrington K (2006). Questionnaire analysis of the swallowing-related outcomes following total laryngectomy. Clinical Otolaryngology, Vol. 31: 525-530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.2006.01335.x

Munn Z, Peters MD, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC medical research methodology, Vol. 18: 1-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L, Khalil H (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis Vol. 18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167

McMeekin N, Wu O, Germeni E et al. How methodological frameworks are being developed: evidence from a scoping review. BMC Med Res Methodol (2020). Vol. 20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01061-4

Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005; Vol. 8: 19-32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci 2010; Vol. 5: 69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69

Lizarondo L, Stern C, Godfrey C, Rieger K, Salmond S, Apostolo J et al (2017). Chapter 8: Mixed methods systematic reviews. In E Aromataris & Z Munn, Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual (4th ed). The Joanna Briggs Institute

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Straus SE (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine Vol. 169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

Peters M, Godfrey C, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares C (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal Of Evidence-Based Healthcare, Vol. 13: 141-146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050

Millar D, Light J, Schlosser R (2006). The Impact of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Intervention on the Speech Production of Individuals with Developmental Disabilities: A Research Review. Journal Of Speech, Language, And Hearing Research, Vol. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/021)

: 248-264

Jolley R, Lorenzetti D, Manalili K, Lu M, Quan H, Santana M (2017). Protocol for a scoping review study to identify and classify patient-centred quality indicators. BMJ Open, Vol. 7, e013632 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013632

Bengtsson M (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open Vol. 2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001

Yeates EM, Molfenter SM, Steele CM (2008). Improvements in tongue strength and pressure generation precision following a tongue-pressure training protocol in older individuals with dysphagia: three case reports. Clinical interventions in aging, Vol. 3: 735-747 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S3825

RESEARCH < 243

Rodríguez-Alcalá L, Martín-Lagos Martínez J, O´Connor-Reina C, Plaza G (2021). Assessment of muscular tone of the tongue using a digital measure spoon in a healthy population: A pilot study. PLoS ONE Vol. 16: e0245901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245901

Vanderwegen J, Guns C, Van Nuffelen G, Elen R, De Bodt M (2013). The influence of age, sex, bulb position, visual feedback, and the order of testing on maximum anterior and posterior tongue strength and endurance in healthy Belgian adults. Dysphagia, Vol. 28: 159-166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-012-9425-x

Tamer R, Chen Y, Xu X, Xie C, Swai J (2020). Short-Term Quality of Life, Functional Status, and Their Predictors in Tongue Cancer Patients After Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap Reconstruction: A Single-Center, Prospective, Comparative Study. Cancer Management and Research, Vol. 12, 11663 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S268912

Lee D, Ryu Y, Hah J, Kwon T, Sung M, Kim K (2014). Long-term subjective tongue function after partial glossectomy. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, Vol. 41: 754-758 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12193

EORTC.org. (2021). EORTC Quality of Life. [Online] Available. Accessed 16 December 2021

Boydell, Katherine & Gladstone, Brenda & Volpe, Tiziana & Allemang, Brooke & Stasiulis, Elaine. (2012). The Production and Dissemination of Knowledge: A Scoping Review of Arts-Based Health Research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Vol. 13, Art. 32

Schlosser RW, Koul R, Costello J (2007). Asking well-built questions for evidence based practice in augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of communication disorders, Vol. 40: 225-238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.06.008

Pham MT, Rajic A, Greig JD, Sargeant JM, Papadopoulos A, McEwen SA (2014). A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research synthesis methods, Vol. 5: 371-385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1123

García-Peris P, Parón L, Velasco C, de la Cuerda C, Cabler M, Bretón I, Herencia H, Verdaguer J, Navarro C, Clave P (2007). Long-term prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients: Impact on quality of life. Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 26: 710-717 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2007.08.006

Park JS, Oh DH, Chang M (2016). Comparison of maximal tongue strength and tongue strength used during swallowing in relation to age in healthy adults. Journal of physical therapy science, Vol. 28: 442-445 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.442

Lazarus CL PhD, Husaini, Hasan BDS MS, Anand SM, MD, Jacobson AS, MD, Mojica JK MS, Buchbinder D MD, Urken ML, MD (2013). “Tongue Strength as a Predictor of Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life After Tongue Cancer Surgery”, The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, Vol. 122: 386-97 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000348941312200608

Hamahata A, Beppu T, Shirakura S, Hatanaka A, Yamaki T, Saitou T, Sakurai H (2014). Tongue pressure in patients with tongue cancer resection and reconstruction. Auris Nasus Larynx, Vol. 41: 563-567 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2014.05.023

Burtet ML, Grando LJ, Mituuti CT (2020). Swallowing and speech of patients submitted to glossectomy due to tongue cancer: cases report. Audiology Communication Research, Vol 25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6431-2019-2183

Blyth K, McCabe P, Madill C, Ballard K (2014). Speech and swallow rehabilitation following partial glossectomy: A systematic review. International Journal of Speech Language Pathology, Vol. 17: 401-410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2014.979880

Boyd D, Gervais C (2013). A Comparison of Two Quality of Life Measures in the Head and Neck Cancer Organ Preservation Population: The EORTC QOL-H&N35 and Semi-Structured Interviews

Halczy-Kowalik L, Wiktor A, Rzewuska A, Kowalczyk R, Wysocki R, Posio V (2015). Compensatory Mechanisms in Patients After a Partial or Total Glossectomy due to Oral Cancer. Dysphagia, Vol. 30: 738-750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-015-9652-z

Markkanen-Leppänen M, Isotalo E, Mäkitie AA, Asko-Seljavaara S, Pessi T, Suominen E, Haapanen ML (2006). Changes in articulatory proficiency following microvascular reconstruction in oral or oropharyngeal cancer. Oral oncology, Vol. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.11.004

: 646-652

Melo Filho MR, de Rocha BA, Pires, MB de O, Fonseca ES, Freitas EM, de Martelli H, Santos FBG (2013). Quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Vol. 79: 82-88 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20130014

Chen AY, Frankowski R, Bishop-Leone J et al (2001). The Development and Validation of a Dysphagia-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: The M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, Vol. 127: 870-76

Grammatica A, Piazza C, Montalto N, Del Bon F, Frittoli B, Mazza M, Nicolai P (2020,

April 2). Compartmental Surgery for Oral Tongue Cancer: Objective and Subjective Functional Evaluation. Laryngoscope, Vol. 131

Balbinot J, Real CS, de Melo CC, Dornelles S, da Costa SS (2020). Quality of life in tongue cancer treated patients before and after speech therapy: a randomized clinical trial. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Vol. 87

Downloads

Published

2023-09-19

How to Cite

Measuring tongue strength in adults after partial glossectomy: a review. (2023). South African Dental Journal, 78(05), 239-243. https://doi.org/10.17159/sadj.v78i05.16892