A simplified and evidence-informed approach to designing removable partial dentures. Part 3. The biomechanical basis of retention

Authors

  • CP Owen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/sadj.v78i10.17387

Keywords:

summarised

Abstract

For many decades the literature has regularly reported that there is a discrepancy between what is taught in dental school and what is practised, especially in the field of removable partial dentures. Not only that, but for more than 60 years reports from around the world have shown that, usually, most clinicians abdicate their responsibility to design a removable partial denture (RPD) and instead leave
this to the dental technician, who has no knowledge of the clinical condition of the patient and works only from a cast. The majority of patients around the world who require RPDs to improve aesthetics and chewing can only afford a removable prosthesis simply because the majority are poor. But RPDs can improve these aspects and contribute to an improved quality of life

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Owen CP. Fundamentals of removable partial dentures. 5th Edition. Chapter 6. Available at https://www.appropriatech.com Accessed 5 September 2023

Bazirgan MK, Bates JF. Effect of clasp design on gingival health. J Oral Rehabil. 1987;14(3):271-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1987.tb00719.x

Owen CP. A simplified approach to designing removable partial dentures. Part 2. The biomechanical basis of support. SADJ 202?

Owen CP, Naidoo N. Guidelines for the choice of circumferential wrought wire and cast clasp arms for removable partial dentures. Int Dent J. 2022;72(1):58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2021.01.005

Iijima Y, Yamada M, Nakamura S, Hino S, Horie N, Kaneko T. Denture Clasp Injury of the Oral Mucosa. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2023;9:1-6. doi:

1177/23337214231162750

Zarrati S, Sadighpour L, Jahanian G. Comparison of clasp retention on enamel and composite resin-recontoured abutments following repeated removal in vitro. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;103(4):240-4. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60037-6

Mothopi-Peri M, Owen CP. Guide-Plane Retention in Designing Removable Partial Dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2018;31(2):145-8. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5525

Avant WE. Indirect retention in partial denture design. J Prosthet Dent. 1966;16(6):1103-10. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(66)90176-4

Carr AB, Brown DT. McCracken’s Removable Partial Prosthodontics, 13th Ed. 2016; Elsevier, St Louis

Kratochvil FJ. Influence of Occlusal Rest Position and Clasp on Movement of Abutment Teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1963;13:114-24

Krol AJ. Clasp design for extension-base removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;29(4):408-15. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(73)80018-6

Thompson WD, Kratochvil FJ, Caputo AA. Evaluation of photoelastic stress patterns produced by various designs of bilateral distal-extension removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1977;38(3):261-73. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(77)90303-1

Berg E. Periodontal problems associated with use of distal extension removable partial dentures – a matter of construction? J Oral Rehabil. 1985;12(5):369-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1985.tb01542.x

Downloads

Published

2024-02-20

How to Cite

A simplified and evidence-informed approach to designing removable partial dentures. Part 3. The biomechanical basis of retention. (2024). South African Dental Journal, 78(10), 513-520. https://doi.org/10.17159/sadj.v78i10.17387