Cervical margin relocation in indirect restorations

Authors

  • Jurie Kok
  • Leanne Sykes Head of Department of Prosthodontics, University of Pretoria, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/sadj.v79i04.17724

Keywords:

interproximal, meticulous

Abstract

Cervical margin relocation (CMR) is a technique used to raise the deepest portion of a cavity preparation from a subgingival to a supragingival level. This paper presents an overview of the technique and an analysis of current thinking and practices regarding the use of CMR when carrying out indirect restorations on teeth with deep subgingival margins. Despite promising results, the procedure is still controversial and most studies have been focused on laboratory-based testing of parameters such as bond strength, marginal integrity and fracture behaviour of the restorations. Although long-term clinical survival rates are reportedly high (96%), debate continues regarding the procedure’s impact on gingival health. This paper will explore the historical and clinical development of CMR,
its indications, advantages and disadvantages, as well as the time and cost implications, and long-term prognosis. While CMR appears to be safe and effective in appropriately selected cases, with meticulous application techniques, further randomised controlled clinical trials are necessary to draw definitive conclusions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Juloski J, Köken S, Ferrari M. Cervical margin relocation in indirect adhesive restorations: A literature review. Capital Journal. 2018; 62(3):273-80

Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Current clinical concepts for adhesive cementation of tooth colored posterior restorations. Practical Periodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry. 1998; 10:47-54

Ferrari M, Koken S, Grandini S, Cagidiaco EF, Joda T, Discepoli N. Influence of cervical margin relocation (CMR) on periodontal health: 12-month results of a controlled trial. Journal of dentistry. 2018; 69:70-64. Bresser R, Gerdolle D, Van den Heijkant I, Sluiter-Pouwels L, Cune M, Gresnigt M. Up to 12 years clinical evaluation of 197 partial indirect restorations with deep margin elevation in the posterior region.

Journal of dentistry. 2019; 91:103227

Grubbs TD, Vargas M, Kolker J, Teixeira E. Efficacy of direct restorative materials in proximal box elevation on the margin quality and fracture resistance of molars restored with CAD/CAM onlays. Operative dentistry. 2020; 45(1):52-616. Ilgenstein I,

Zitzmann NU, Bühler J, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T, Weiger R, et al. Influence of proximal box elevation on the marginal quality and fracture behavior of root-filled molars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic or composite onlays. Clinical oral investigations. 2015; 19:1021-8

Mente J, Hieber F, Sekundo C, Schuessler DEL, Gehrig H. MTA Matrix Technique: Restoration of Teeth with Deep Subgingival Defects Extending Down to the Osseous Crest. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2022; 24(1):269-78

Veneziani M. Adhesive restorations in the posterior area with subgingival cervical margins: new classification and differentiated treatment approach. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2010; 5(1):50-76

Rodrigues FAM. Ceramic onlay: influence of the deep margin elevation technique on stress distribution: a finite element analysis 201610. Ismail HS, Ali AI, El Mehesen R, Garcia-Godoy F, Mahmoud SH. Periodontal evaluation of subgingival open sandwich restorations: 2-year results of a randomized double-blind trial. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 2023

Ferraris F. Posterior indirect adhesive restorations (PIAR): preparation designs and adhesthetics clinical protocol. Int J Esthet Dent. 2017; 12(4):482-502

Sidhu SK, Schmalz G. The biocompatibility of glass-ionomer cement materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. American journal of dentistry. 2001; 14(6):387-96

Alves CMC, Imbronito AV, Matson E. The use of ionomer cements in subgingival restorations and furcation defects: current concepts. Arq. odontol. 2004:237-4414. Mustafa HA, Soares AP, Paris S, Elhennawy K, Zaslansky P. The forgotten merits of GIC restorations: A systematic review. Clinical oral investigations. 2020; 24:2189-20115. Qanungo A, Aras MA, Chitre V, Mysore A, Amin B, Daswani SR. Immediate

dentin sealing for indirect bonded restorations. Journal of prosthodontic research. 2016; 60(4):240-9

Downloads

Published

2024-07-12

How to Cite

Cervical margin relocation in indirect restorations. (2024). South African Dental Journal, 79(04), 203-206. https://doi.org/10.17159/sadj.v79i04.17724

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>