Perspectives on the Minamata Convention and dental amalgam waste management in South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/sadj.v79i10.19172Keywords:
Minamata Convention, mercury, dental amalgam, dental amalgam wasteAbstract
The Minamata Convention on Mercury (MCM), a pivotal multilateral agreement, is dedicated to controlling human sources of mercury environmental release. Due to their unique properties, mercury and its compounds were extensively used in products and industrial processes. Human activities have escalated atmospheric mercury levels by 450%, causing severe environmental and life-threatening consequences. The MCM focuses on restricting mercury mining, phasing out and phasing down mercury use in products and processes, controlling environmental emissions and regulating small scale gold mining. Dental amalgam restorative material is the
only product subject to a phase-down approach through the prevention of dental caries, research for alternative restorative
materials, and waste management practices. The increasing understanding of mercury’s health and environmental impacts
has led to restricting dental amalgam use in pregnant women and children, phase-out in several countries, and cessation of
the marketing of dental amalgam by some manufacturers. This perspective delves into the current approaches to managing
dental amalgam waste and proposes improvements to dental amalgam waste management practices in South Africa.
Downloads
References
Koloutsou-Vakakis S, Chinta I. Multilateral Environmental Agreements for Wastes and Chemicals: 40 Years of Global Negotiations. Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Jan 1;45(1):10-5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/es101373n
UNEP. New convention calls time on mercury poisoning. UN Environment. 2017. Available from: http://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/new-convention-calls-time-mercury-poisoning
UNEP. Minamata Convention on Mercury: Text and Annexes. 2023. Available from: https://minamataconvention.org/sites/default/files/documents/2023-10/Minamata-Convention-booklet-Oct2023-EN.pdf
Sakaguchi R, Ferracane J, Powers J, editors. Chapter 10 - Restorative Materials: Metals. In: Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials (14th Edition). Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2019. p. 171-208.
Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment, South Africa. National Environment Act, 1998, (Act No 107 of 1998), Consultation on the Draft National Regulations for the Management of Mercury in South Africa. 2023.
UNEP. South Africa brings to 108 the number of Parties to the Minamata Convention. Minamata Convention on Mercury. 2019. Available from: https://minamataconvention.org/en/news/south-africa-brings-108-number-parties-minamata-convention
Broussard LA, Hammett-Stabler CA, Winecker RE, Ropero-Miller JD. The Toxicology of Mercury. Lab Med. 2002;33(8):614-25.
Gworek B, Dmuchowski W, Baczewska-Dabrowska AH. Mercury in the terrestrial environment: a review. Environ Sci Eur. 2020 Oct 2;32(1):128. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00401-x
AMAP/UNEP. Technical Background Report for the Global Mercury Assessment 2018/Global Mercury Partnership. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, Oslo, Norway/UN Environment Programme, Chemicals and Health Branch, Geneva, Switzerland. 2019. Available from: https://www.unep.org/globalmercurypartnership/resources/report/technical-background-report-global-mercury-assessment-2018
Geyman BM, Thackray CP, Jacob DJ, Sunderland EM. Impacts of Volcanic Emissions on the Global Biogeochemical Mercury Cycle: Insights from Satellite Observations and Chemical Transport Modeling. Geophys Res Lett. 2023;50(21):e2023GL104667. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2023GL104667
Masekoameng KE, Leaner J, Dabrowski J. Trends in anthropogenic mercury emissions estimated for South Africa during 2000-2006. Atmos Environ. 2010 Aug;44(25):3007-14. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1352231010003791
Beckers F, Rinklebe J. Cycling of mercury in the environment: Sources, fate, and human health implications: A review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2017 May 3;47(9):693-794. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10643389.2017.1326277
WHO. 10 chemicals of public health concern. 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/photo-story/photo-story-detail/10-chemicals-of-public-health-concern
Jenks AL. Chapter 1: The Minamata Disaster and the True Cost of Japanese Modernization. In: Perils of Progress: Environmental Disasters in the Twentieth Century. 1st ed. Prentice Hall; 2011. p. 159. Available from: https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/8658738
Mcalpine D, Araki S. Minamata Disease: An Unusual Neurological Disorder Caused by Contaminated Fish. The Lancet. 1958 Sep;272(7047):629-31. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673658903489
Yorifuji T, Tsuda T, Harada M. Chapter 5 Minamata Disease: A Challenge for Democracy and Justice. In: Late Lessons from Early Warnings: Science, Precaution, Innovation. Luxembourg: European Environment Agency; 2013. p. 764. Available from: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2800/73322
Ekino S, Susa M, Ninomiya T, Imamura K, Kitamura T. Minamata disease revisited: An update on the acute and chronic manifestations of methyl mercury poisoning. J Neurol Sci. 2007 Nov 15;262(1):131-44. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022510X07004558
Hachiya N. Epidemiological Update of Methylmercury and Minamata Disease. In: Ceccatelli S, Aschner M, editors. Methylmercury and Neurotoxicity. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2012. p. 1-11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2383-6_1
Karagas MR, Choi AL, Oken E, Horvat M, Schoeny R, Kamai E, et al. Evidence on the Human Health Effects of Low-Level Methylmercury Exposure. Environ Health Perspect. 2012 Jun;120(6):799-806. Available from: https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/ehp.1104494
Carstens J. SEE: Potentially dangerous mercury levels in SA retail fish. Life. 2016. Available from: https://www.news24.com/life/archive/see-potentially-dangerous-mercury-levels-in-sa-retail-fish-20161101
Dixon N. South Africa: Bosses Who Kill. Green Left. 1993. Available from: https://www.greenleft.org.au/content/south-africa-bosses-who-kill
Oosthuizen J, Ehrlich R. The impact of pollution from a mercury processing plant in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, on the health of fish-eating communities in the area: An environmental health risk assessment. Int J Environ Health Res. 2001 Apr 1;11:41-50.
Papu-Zamxaka V, Mathee A, Harpham T, Barnes B, Röllin H, Lyons M, et al. Elevated mercury exposure in communities living alongside the Inanda Dam, South Africa. J Environ Monit. 2010;12(2):472-7.
Carnie T. At long last, Thor’s poisonous mercury is getting cleaned up. Daily Maverick. 2021. Available from: https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2021-04-17-at-long-last-thors-poisonous-mercury-is-getting-cleaned-up/
Madimu T. ‘Illegal’ Gold Mining and the Everyday in Post-Apartheid South Africa. Rev Afr Polit Econ. 2022 Jul 3;49:436. Available from: https://www.scienceopen.com/doi/10.1080/03056244.2022.2027750
Esdaile LJ, Chalker JM. The Mercury Problem in Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining. Chem – Eur J. 2018;24(27):6905-16. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/chem.201704840
George J, Sadiq E, Moola I, Maharaj S, Mochan A. Informal gold miners with mercury toxicity: novel asymmetrical neurological presentations. S Afr Med J. 2023 Dec 4;113(12):20. Available from: https://samajournals.co.za/index.php/samj/article/view/1127
World Bank. Mercury trade and use for artisanal and small-scale gold mining in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank/COWI; 2016.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Annex A to the Minamata Convention on Mercury, as amended by the Conference of Parties at its fourth meeting. Mercury-added products. Minamata Convention on Mercury; 2022. Report No.: UNEP/MC/COP.4/Dec.3/Add.1. Available from: https://minamataconvention.org/sites/default/files/documents/decision/4_Dec3_Add1_Amendment.English.pdf
UNEP. Practical sourcebook on mercury waste storage and disposal. 2015. Available from: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/9839/-Practical_Sourcebook_on_Mercury_Waste_Storage_and_Disposal-2015Sourcebook_Mercruy_FINAL_web.pdf
UNEP. Technical guidelines on the environmentally sound management of waste consisting of, containing, or contaminated with mercury or mercury compounds. 2023.
UNEP. Catalogue of technologies and services on mercury waste management. UNEP Global Mercury Partnership Waste Management Area; 2024. Available from: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/27819/WMA_catalog.pdf
Department of Health, South Africa. Norms, standards and practice guidelines for primary oral health care. 2005.
Department of Environmental Affairs, South Africa. Inventory of mercury releases in South Africa. Pretoria: Department of Environmental Affairs; 2011.
Jones DW. Putting dental mercury pollution into perspective. Br Dent J. 2004 Aug 28;197(4):175-7.
Jokstad A, Fan P. Amalgam waste management. Int Dent J. 2006 Jun 1;56(3):147-53. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653920343392
Drummond JL, Cailas MD, Croke K. Mercury generation potential from dental waste amalgam. J Dent. 2003 Sep;31(7):493-501.
Stone M, Kuehne J, Cohen M, Talbott J, Scott J. Effect of iodine on mercury concentrations in dental-unit wastewater. Dent Mater. 2006 Feb;22(2):119-24. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0109564105001387
Zhao X, Rockne KJ, Drummond JL, Hurley RK, Shade CW, Hudson RJM. Characterization of methyl mercury in dental wastewater and correlation with sulfate-reducing bacterial DNA. Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Apr 15;42(8):2780-6.
Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS). Promoting the ‘phase down’ approach of dental amalgam in developing countries – Tanzania. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: MUHAS; 2014. Available from: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/31412/EADA_Tanzania.pdf
World Health Organization (WHO). Report of the informal global WHO consultation with policymakers in dental public health, 2021: monitoring country progress in phasing down the use of dental amalgam. Geneva; 2021. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/348985/9789240038424-eng.pdf
Jansen KE, Kocks DJ, Roberts H. Healthcare risk waste and waste legislation in South Africa. Occup Health S Afr. 2017 Nov;23(6):15-7.
Department of Health, South Africa. The National Health Act, 2003 (Act No. 61 of 2003) regulations relating to healthcare waste management in health establishments. Government Gazette No. 37654; 2014. Available from: https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/37654rg10195gon375.pdf
Department of Environmental Affairs, South Africa. 2017 health care risk waste treatment figures. 2019. Report No.: Draft SAEO2019.
South African Bureau of Standards (SABS) Standards Division. South African National Standard 10248.3:2011. Management of healthcare risk waste from minor generators – registered healthcare professionals and non-healthcare professionals. 2011.
American Dental Association (ADA). Best management practices for amalgam waste. 2007. Available from: https://www.ada.org/-/media/project/ada-organization/ada/ada-org/files/resources/research/oral-health-topics/topics_amalgamwaste_brochure.pdf
WHO. Future use of materials for dental restoration. 2010. 65 p. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241500647
Department of Environmental Affairs, South Africa. Analysis of mercury in the health care sector. Department of Environmental Affairs; 2011. Available from: https://noharm-europe.org/sites/default/files/documents-files/2679/SA_Mercury_Report.pdf
South African Dental Association (SADA). Dental amalgam – position statement. 2014. Available from: https://www.sada.co.za/Dental_Amalgam
SABS Standards Division. South African National Standard 24234:2008. Dentistry, mercury and alloys for dental amalgam. 2008.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 20749:2023. Dentistry – pre-capsulated amalgam. 2023. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/82859.html
Makhubele KC. Starting in 2023, SADA members can purchase amalgam separators at discounted prices. S Afr Dent J. 2023 Mar 9;78(01):2. Available from: https://journals.assaf.org.za/index.php/sadj/article/view/15708
WHO. Global oral health status report: towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030: regional summary of the African Region. 2023. viii, 24 p. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/366662/9789240070769-eng.pdf
Smit D, Osman Y. The availability of the basic oral health care package in the Western Cape. S Afr Dent J. 2017;72(6). Available from: http://ref.scielo.org/b955gm
Mark A. Amalgam fillings: safe, strong, and affordable. J Am Dent Assoc. 2019 Oct 1;150:894.
Forrai J. History of amalgam in dentistry. Rev Clin Pesq Odontol. 2007;3(1):65-71.
Schwendicke F, Göstemeyer G, Stolpe M, Krois J. Amalgam alternatives: cost-effectiveness and value of information analysis. J Dent Res. 2018 Nov;97(12):1317-23. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022034518782671
Tibau AV, Grube BD. Dental amalgam and the Minamata Convention on Mercury Treaty: make mercury history for all. J Oral Dent Health. 2023 Sep;7(3). Available from: https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/dental-amalgam-and-the-minamata-convention-on-mercury-treaty-make-mercury-history-for-all.pdf
Malele-Kolisa Y. Unpacking the NHI Bill recently passed by parliament in May 2023: implications for oral health. S Afr Dent J. 2023 Dec 23;78(09):467-8. Available from: https://journals.assaf.org.za/index.php/sadj/article/view/17496
Essa AY, Ahmed S, Dyason A, Karjiker F, Adam RZ. Teaching and placement of dental amalgam restorations at South African dental schools. Front Oral Health. 2023 Jul 19;4. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oral-health/articles/10.3389/froh.2023.1118361/full
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
.png){kind=spacer}