The Testamentary Trust: Is it a Trust or a Will? Hanekom v Voigt 2016 1 SA 416 (WCC)

  • Eben Nel Research Associate, Department Mercantile Law, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth
Keywords: amendment of trust deed, appointment of trustees, freedom of testation, Oudekraal principle, succession, testamentary trust, trust mortis causa

Abstract

The recent judgment in Hanekom v Voigt 2016 1 SA 416 (WCC) is evaluated in the light of the traditional understanding of the testamentary trust. It is evaluated from both a testamentary disposition and a trust law perspective, with the aim of determining whether the Hanekom matter has touched a particular nerve in the will versus trust debate as far as the trust mortis causa is concerned. From this judgment, the importance of differentiating between the spheres of testamentary law and trust law, to ensure legal certainty, became clear. The court submitted that the mere fact that a trust happens to be of testamentary origin should not influence the evaluation of the validity of the amendment of the trust instrument. The court underlined the dynamic nature of the trust figure in referring to it as a "supple, living institution." The nature of the powers vested in the Master of the High Court, both as far as the appraisal of the trust instrument and the appointment of trustees are concerned, is also considered in the judgement. In evaluating the facts of the case, the court recognised the applicability of the Oudekraal principle as it has been developed in the field of administrative law. The writer comes to the conclusion that, while the Hanekom case does illustrate some legal challenges in the last will and testament environment, it also offers a number of valuable lessons for will-drafters. The approach by the court is encouraging, as it shows some sensitivity for the true nature of the testamentary trust. The confirmation by the court that a testamentary trust is in the first instance a trust and not a will per se is to be welcomed, and is a true and realistic reflection of the nature of the institution.

References

REFERENCES

Literature

Boshoff B and Williams K “When a testator’s will shall not be done” Oct 2015 Without Prejudice 64-65

Cameron E et al Honore’s South African Law of Trusts (Juta 2002)

Corbett MM et al The Law of Succession in South Africa (Juta 1980)

Christie RH and Bradfield GB Christie’s The Law of Contract in South Africa (LexisNexis 2011)

De Waal M and Paleker M (eds) South African Law of Succession and Trusts (Juta 2014)

Du Toit F “Reflections on the bewind trust in light of the Dutch testamentary bewind” 2011 TSAR 540-546

Du Toit F “The impact of social and economic factors on freedom of testation in roman and roman-dutch law” 1999 Stell LR 232

Du Toit F “The limits imposed upon freedom of testation by the boni mores: lessons from common law and civil (continental) legal systems” 2000 Stell LR 358

Geach WA and Yeats J Trusts: Law and Practice (Juta 2007)

Hirsch AJ “Freedom of testation / Freedom of contract” 2011(95) Minnesota LR 2180-2253

Hosten WJ et al Introduction to South African Law and Legal Theory (Butterworths 1983)

Martin JE Modern Equity (Sweet and Maxwell 2005)

Meyerowitz D The Law and Practice of Administration of Estates and their Taxation (Juta 2010)

Olivier PA, Strydom S and Van den Berg GPJ Trustreg en Praktyk (LexisNexis Butterworths 2009)

Pace RP and Van der Westhuizen WM Wills and Trusts (Butterworths 2007)

Pettit PH Equity and the Law of Trusts (Oxford 2006)

Pretorius DM “The status and force of defective administrative decisions pending judicial pronouncements” 2009 SALJ 537

South African Law Commission Report on the Review of the Law of Trusts (Project 9, June 1987)

Stephenson GT & Wiggins NA Estates and Trusts (Meredith 1973)

Van der Merwe CG & Du Plessis JE (eds) Introduction to the Law of South Africa (Kluwer 2004)

Van der Merwe NJ, Rowland CJ & Cronje MB Die Suid-Afrikaanse Erfreg (Van der Walt 1990)

Van der Merwe SWJ, Van Huyssteen LF, Reinecke MFB & Lubbe GF Contract: General Principles (Juta 2012)

Case law

Absa Bank Ltd v Lombard 2005 5 SA 350 (SCA)

Administrators, Estate Richards v Nichol 1996 4 SA 253 (C)

Badenhorst v Bekker 1994 2 SA 155 (N)

Barkhuizen v Napier 2007 5 SA 323 (CC)

Braun v Blann and Botha NNO 1984 (2) SA 850 (A)

Bredenkamp v Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd 2010 4 SA 468 (SCA)

Bydawell v Chapman 1953 3 SA 514 (A)

Commissioner for Inland Revenue v Estate Crewe 1943 AD 656

Conze v Masterbond Participation Trust Managers (Pty) Ltd 1996 3 SA 786 (C)

Crookes NO v Watson 1956 1 SA 277 (A) 306

Del Grande v Sebastian (1999) 27 ETR 2d 295 (Ontario Supreme Court)

Estate Kemp v McDonald’s Trustee 1915 AD 491

Ex parte Trustees M.H. Adam 1927 N.P.D. 314

Ex parte Hulton 1954 1 SA 460 (C)

Ex parte Jewish Colonial Trust Ltd: In Re Estate Nathan 1967 4 SA 397 (N)

Ex parte Knight and Others 1946 CPD 800

Ex parte Marais en Andere 1966 3 SA 378 (O)

Ex parte Naude NO 1945 OPD 1

Ex Parte Sidelsky 1983 4 SA 598 (C)

Ex parte Watling and Others 1982 1 SA 936 (C)

Groeschke v Trustee, Groeschke Family Trust and Others 2013 3 SA 254 (GSJ)

Hanekom v Voigt No and Others 2016 1 SA 416 (WCC)

In re BOE Trust Ltd and Others NNO 2013 3 SA 236 (SCA)

In re Crosbie’s Estate 27 SC 50

In re Estate Linder 1935 N.P.D 99

Joubert v Van Rensburg 2001 1 SA 753 (W)

MEC for Health, Eastern Cape v Kirland Investments (Pty) Ltd [2014] ZACC 6; 2014 3 SA 481 (CC); 2014 5 BCLR 547 (CC)

Merafong City Local Municipality v Anglogold Ashanti Ltd [2016] ZACC 35

NBS Boland Bank Ltd v One Berg River Drive CC 1999 4 SA 928 (SCA)

Oudekraal Estates (Pty) Ltd v City of Cape Town and Others 2004 6 SA 222 (SCA)

Peterson and Another NNO v Claassen 2006 5 SA 191

Potgieter v Potgieter NO [2011] ZASCA 181 (case no 629/2010) (30-09-2011) (SCA)

Ras NO and Others v Van der Meulen and Another (635/09) [2010] ZASCA 163; 2011 4 SA 17 (SCA)

Robertson v Robertson’s Executors 1914 AD 503

Roodezandt Ko-operatiewe Wynmakery Ltd v Robertson Winery (Pty) Ltd and Another (503/13) [2014] ZASCA 173 (19-11-2014)

Schaumberg v Stark 1956 4 SA 462 (A) 468A

South African Forestry Co Ltd v York Timbers Ltd 2005 3 SA 323 (SCA)

Vorster v Steyn 1981 3 All SA 177(O) 177-178; 1981 2 SA 831 (O)

Legislation

Administration of Estates Act 66 of 1965

Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000

Trust Property Control Act 57 of 1988

Wills Act 7 of 1953

Directives

Chief Master Directive 2 of 2017, dated 6 March 2017
Views
  • Abstract 0
  • pdf 0
  • XML 0
Views and downloads are with effect from 11 January 2018
Published
2018-04-11
Section
Articles