Heritage Lost:The cultural impact of wildlife crime in South Africa
AbstractCrimes against wildlife have come to the fore in South Africa in the past decade – largely due to the dramatic escalation of rhino poaching. As a major custodian of iconic species such as the Big Five, South Africa is at the core of the illicit wildlife economy. Since the country is reliant on wildlife tourism for economic development, poaching brings serious financial consequences. These negative impacts, however, extend far beyond the economy and also protrude into the cultural sphere. While some South Africans may be unmoved by the plight of the country’s wildlife as a result of a lack of exposure thereto, many feel socially linked to wildlife. Concerned citizens often consider that future generations will not be able to experience wildlife due to extinction, and will thus be deprived of their rightful cultural inheritance. The impact of wildlife crime may therefore be seen as a form of cultural victimisation.
International Fund for Animal Welfare, 2014, Wanted – Dead or Alive, Exposing Online Wildlife Trade, http://www.ifaw.org/international/resource-centre/wanted-dead-or-alive-exposing-online-wildlife-trade, (accessed 16/12/2014).
Tanya Wyatt, Wildlife Trafficking: A Deconstruction of the Crime, the Victims and the Offenders, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, 8-9.
Wyatt, Wildlife Trafficking: A Deconstruction of the Crime, the Victims and the Offenders, 70.
Nick Davies & Oliver Holmes, The crime family at the centre of Asia's animal trafficking network, The Guardian, 26 September 2016, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/sep/26/bach-brothers-elephant-ivory-asias-animal-trafficking-network (accessed 01/02/2017).
Wyatt, Wildlife Trafficking: A Deconstruction of the Crime, the Victims and the Offenders, 65.
Bantu Holomisa, Speech in the national assembly on the subject of rhino poaching and its impact on our heritage, United Democratic Movement, 2014, http://udm.org.za/national-assembly-subject-rhino-poaching-impact-heritage/, (accessed 01/02/2017).
President Jacob Zuma, Anti-Rhino Poaching Awareness Day and visit to the Kruger National Park, South African Government, 1 November 2015, http://www.gov.za/speeches/president-jacob-zuma-anti-rhino-poaching-awareness-day-and-visit-kruger-national-park-1-nov (accessed 01/02/2017).
Laurel Neme, Justice for Rhinos - When Will It Come?, National Geographic: A Voice for Elephants, 20 October 2016, http://voices.nationalgeographic.com/2016/10/20/justice-for-rhinos-when-will-it-come/ (accessed 01/02/2017).
Andy, Why is poaching such a problem?, International Anti-Poaching Foundation, 21 August 2013, https://theproblemofpoaching.wordpress.com/2013/08/21/why-is-poaching-such-a-problem/ (accessed 01/02/2017).
FJW Herbig, Conservation crime causation: Towards proactive compliance management, Acta Criminologica: Southern African Journal of Criminology, (21-2), (2008), 27-39.
KE Du Bois, The Illegal Trade in Endangered Species, African Security Review, (6-1), (1997), http://issafrica.org/Pubs/ASR/6No1/DuBois.html (accessed 16/12/2014).
Annette Hübschle, The social economy of rhino poaching: Of economic freedom fighters, professional hunters and marginalized local people, Current Sociology, (1–
21), (2016), 1.
KE Du Bois, The Illegal Trade in Endangered Species, African Security Review.
Paul Herman, What motivates SA citizens to poach rhino?, News24.com, 29 September 2016, http://www.news24.com/Green/News/what-motivates-sa-citizens-to-poach-rhino-20160927 (accessed 01/02/2017).
Rachel Nuwer, The Rare African Park Where Elephants Are Thriving, National Geographic, 28 January 2017, http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/01/wildlife-watch-chad-zakouma-elephants-poaching/ (accessed 28/01/2017).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
SACQ is licenced under a creative commons licence (CC BY) that allows others to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long a they give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
Copyright for articles published is vested equally between the author/s, the Institute for Security Studies and the Centre of Criminology (UCT).