A Whole-of-Society Approach to Wildlife Crime in South Africa

Duarte Gonçalves

Abstract


The recent and rapid increase in wildlife crime not only threatens the survival of significant populations of endangered species in South Africa, but also threatens regional security, the sustainability of the tourism sector and social stability of local communities. Many interventions and actions in addressing wildlife crime fail to achieve sustained impact mainly due to the complexity of the problem and the resulting multiple and simultaneous interventions needed along the short, medium and long term. Factors that contribute to the complexity of the problem are, the number of role players involved, the framing of the problem through different worldviews, the high stakes, the number of simultaneous aspects of interventions, the problem dynamics and the huge number of interactions. Different aspects of the problem are interconnected, but stakeholders are tempted to address the problem in parts (fragmentation), thus creating new problems. This dynamic facilitates situations in which decision makers find the problem too big and complex to address and they remain in a state of crisis management. Addressing the current wildlife crisis requires harmonised efforts incorporating on-the-ground cross-border cooperation and a strategic environment that balances conserving wildlife with stakeholder needs for economic growth and local, national, and regional stability. This paper explores innovative and integrated ways in mitigating the complexity of the wildlife crime problem. The approach is problem focused as opposed to discipline focused or organisation-centric. The paper also discusses the lessons learnt and the resulting preliminary set of “principles”: inclusivity of actors, different ways of being and knowing as ways of addressing fragmentation; foresight; governance, as dynamic problem solving to build capabilities; and the transforming organisational narratives as part of implementing new strategies. These “principles” form the basis of the whole-of-society approach in dealing with complexity and can be applied in future interventions that concentrate on combining operational and scientific expertise with local knowledge, through participatory learning and governance.


Keywords


whole of society; wildlife crime; poaching; organised crime

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrews, M., Pritchett, L. & Woolcock, M., 2013. Escaping capability traps through problem driven iterative adaptation (PDIA). World Development, Volume 51, pp. 234-244.

Berg, J. & Shearing, C., 2011. The practice of crime prevention: Design principles for more effective security governance. South African Crime Quarterly, Volume 36, pp. 23-30.

Bohm, D., 2002. Wholeness and the implicate order. s.l.:Psychology Press.

Brynard, P. A., 2006. Policy implementation. Administratio, p. 13.

Buzan, B., 2009. People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. 2nd ed. s.l.:ECPR Press.

Caudle, S. & de Spiegeleire, S., 2010. A New Generation of National Security Strategies: Early Findings from the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 7(1).

de Spiegeleire, S., 2011. Ten Trends in Capability Planning for Defence and Security. The RUSI Journal, 156(5), pp. 20-28.

Duffy, R., 2014. Waging a war to save biodiversity: the rise of militarized conservation. International Affairs, 90(4), pp. 819-834.

Duncker, L., 2016. A Whole-of-Society approach to Addressing Wildlife Crime in South Africa: KZN Stakeholder and Community Study, s.l.: s.n.

Ferreira, S., Mabunda, D., Magome, H. & Hendriks, H., 2013. Management and Conservation of Rhino Populations on State Owned Land.

Hoogervorst, J., 2009. Enterprise governance and enterprise engineering. s.l.:s.n.

Hubschle-Finch, A., 2016. A Game of Horns: Transnational Flows of Rhino Horn. s.l.:s.n.

Inayatullah, S., 2013. The futures of policing: going beyond the thin blue line. Futures, Volume 49, pp. 1-8.

International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, 2000. Improving Coordination, s.l.: s.n.

Lindblom, C. E., 1979. Still muddling, not yet through. Public administration review, 39(6), pp. 517-526.

McDonald, M., 2008. Securitization and the Construction of Security. European journal of international relations, 14(4), pp. 563-587.

Milliken, T. & Shaw, J., 2012. The South Africa – Viet Nam Rhino Horn Trade Nexus, s.l.: s.n.

Parsons, W., 2002. From Muddling Through to Muddling Up - Evidence Based Policy Making and the Modernisation of British Government. Public Policy and Administration, 17(3), p. 43.

Shelley, L. I., 2014. Dirty entanglements: corruption, crime, and terrorism. s.l.:Cambridge University Press.

Sinovich, J. E., 2011. Enhancing National Security Decision Making Through Innovative Strategic Planning. Executive National Security Programme 23/11.

Slaughter, R. A. & Inayatullah, S., 2005. Knowledge base of futures studies. s.l.:Foresight International.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2413-3108/2017/v0n60a1747

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Comments on this article

View all comments


Copyright (c) 2017 Author and Institute for Security Studies

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.