Improving the efficiency of evidence-based interventions: The strengths and limitations of randomised controlled trials

  • Mark Tomlinson Stellenbosch University
  • Catherine L Ward University of Cape Town
  • Marguerite Marlow Stellenbosch University
Keywords: Evidence-based interventions, randomised controlled trials, clinical practice


Globally, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are increasingly seen as the gold standard of programme evaluation, representing the best way to determine whether new interventions are effective – but they are not without limitations. In this article, we discuss the phases of scientific discovery and the research standards that are necessary before scaling up interventions. We also outline the core characteristics of RCTs, such as randomisation, efficacy and effectiveness, and discuss the benefits of using the RCT as the standard of intervention evaluation. We discuss how ‘realist’ evaluation contributes to what policymakers need to know in order to make a decision about an evaluation and alternatives to the RCT, such as stepped wedge, regression discontinuity, non-randomised cohort, and time series designs.

Author Biographies

Mark Tomlinson, Stellenbosch University
Department of Psychology
Catherine L Ward, University of Cape Town
Department of Psychology and the Safety and Violence Initiative
Marguerite Marlow, Stellenbosch University
Department of Psychology
  • Abstract 116
  • PDF 59
Views and downloads are with effect from 11 January 2018
Research articles