Awaiting a Fair Trial

Long-Term Remand Detention and Legal Representation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/

Abstract

Between 1995 and 2003, a number of legislative reforms made it more difficult for accused persons in South Africa to be released on bail. As a result, roughly one-third of South Africa’s total prison population is comprised of those held in remand detention. Drawing on 22 months of ethnographic research in regional courtrooms in the Thohoyandou area, this article contends that those who are held in long-term remand detention are more likely to dismiss their state-sponsored legal counsel in order to defend themselves in court. By tracing the connections between long-term remand detention, lengthy trials and self-representation, I argue for expanding how we understand the injustices associated with remand detention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Sonia Rupcic, Brown University

    Sonia Rupcic is a legal and medical anthropologist with public health training. She is currently an Advanced Postdoctoral Fellow at the Center for Health Equity and Research Promotion at the Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System. Her research focuses on the intersection between gendered violence, clinical care and the law in South Africa and the United States. She is grateful for research support provided by the American Council of Learned Societies, the Mellon Foundation, the Wenner-Gren Foundation, the Social Science Research Council, the National Science Foundation, the Fulbright Program, and the University of Michigan. 

Downloads

Published

2023-12-01

Issue

No. 72 (2023): SACQ 2023

Section

Research articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Author and Institute for Security Studies

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

SACQ is licenced under a creative commons licence (CC BY) that allows others to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long a they give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

Copyright for articles published is vested equally between the author/s, the Institute for Security Studies and the Centre of Criminology (UCT).