Quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate students at the Wits Oral Health Centre

Authors

  • Ebrahim Patel School of Oral Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7683-4867
  • A Alaali M Ehbesh Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Alasmarya University, Zliten, Libya.
  • Ismail E Munshi Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Oral Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • Saidah Tootla Department of Paediatric & Restorative Dentistry, School of Oral Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/10.17159/2519-0105/2021/v76no5a5

Keywords:

Quality, root canal treatment, undergraduate student.

Abstract

In 2012, the School of Oral Health Sciences at the University of the Witwatersrand modified its undergraduate
endodontic curriculum which led to a need to assess the impact of curriculum changes on root canal treatment
outcomes. This study was an audit of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate BDS students using
postoperative radiographs, and compared the results between different undergraduate clinical years of study.
Postoperative periapical radiographs of patients treated by undergraduate students were examined to assess
length, density and taper. Two independent investigators were first calibrated, and thereafter assessed 299
endodontic cases that were performed by third, fourth and fifth year students during the 2013-2015 period at
the Wits Oral Health Centre. 68.9%, 73.6% and 70.9% were found for adequate length, acceptable density and acceptable taper of root filling respectively. The most acceptable length, density and taper results were seen in patients treated by final year students, while the lowest results were observed in the fourth year student cohort. There was a tendency for third year students to overfill due to over-instrumentation of anterior teeth.
The change in the curriculum has been justified, though room for improvement exists. The superior result found in the 5th year student cohort was most likely due to  their relative experience, and the use of rotary instrumentation and dental operating microscopes. Endodontic teaching should further emphasize the importance of length control during endodontic treatment and more stringent steps may be necessary during patient allocation and clinical supervision of fourth year dental students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

De Moor R, Hülsmann M, Kirkevang LL, Tanalp J, Whitworth J. Undergraduate Curriculum Guidelines for Endodontology. International Endodontic Journal. 2013 46(12): 1105-14.

Eleftheriadis G, Lambrianidis T. Technical Quality of Root Canal Treatment and Detection of Iatrogenic Errors in an Undergraduate Dental Clinic. International Endodontic Journal. 2005; 38(10): 725-34.

Sonntag D, Bärwald R, Hülsmann M, Stachniss V, Pre-Clinical Endodontics: a Survey Amongst German Dental Schools. International Endodontic Journal, 2008; 41(10): 863-8.

Burke F, Lynch C, Ní Ríordáin R, Hannigan A. Technical Quality of Root Canal Fillings Performed in a Dental School and the Associated Retention of Root-Filled Teeth: A Clinical Follow-up Study over a 5-Year Period. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2009; 36(7): 508-15.

Kelbauskas E, Andriukaitiene L, Nedzelskiene I. Quality of Root Canal Filling Performed by Undergraduate Students of Odontology at Kaunas University of Medicine in Lithuania. Stomatologija. 2009; 11(3), 92-6.

Khabbaz M, Protogerou E, Douka E. Radiographic Quality of Root Fillings Performed by Undergraduate Students. International Endodontic Journal. 2010; 43(6): 499-508.

European Society of Endodontology. Undergraduate Curriculum Guidelines for Endodontology. International Endo-donticJournal. 1992; 25(3); 169-72.

Wesselink PR. Consensus Report of the European Society of Endodontology on Quality Guidelines for Endodontic Treatment. International Endodontic Journal. 1994; 27(3): 115-24.

Lost C. Undergraduate Curriculum Guidelines for Endodontology. International Endodontic Journal. 2001; 34(8): 574-80.]

Loest C. Quality Guidelines for Endodontic Treatment: Consensus Report of the European Society of Endodontology. International Endodontic Journal. 2006; 39(12): 921-30.

Lynch C, Burke F. Quality of Root Canal Fillings Performed by Undergraduate Dental Students on Single-Rooted Teeth. European Journal of Dental Education. 2006; 10(2), 67-72.

Siqueira J. Aetiology of Root Canal Treatment Failure: Why Well-Treated Teeth Can Fail. International Endodontic Journal. 2001; 34(1): 1-10.

Tamse A, Kaffe I, Fishel D. Zygomatic Arch Interference with Correct Radiographic Diagnosis in Maxillary Molar Endodontics. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1980 50(6): 563-65.

Ridao-Sacie C, Segura-Egea JJ, Fernández-Palacín A, BullónFernández P, Ríos-Santos JV. Radiological Assessment of Periapical Status using the Periapical Index: Comparison of Periapical Radiography and Digital Panoramic Radiography. International Endodontic Journal, 2007; 40(6): 433-40.

Greene KJ, Krell KV. Clinical Factors Associated with Ledged Canals in Maxillary and Mandibular Molars. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1990; 70(4): 490-7.

Kapalas A, Lambrianidis T. Factors Associated with Root Canal Ledging during Instrumentation. Dental Traumatology. 2000; 16(5): 229-31.

Barrieshi-Nusair K, Al-Omari M, Al-Hiyasat A. RadiographicTechnical Quality of Root Canal Treatment Performed by Dental Students at the Dental Teaching Centre in Jordan. Journal of Dentistry. 2004; 32(4): 301-07.

Er O, Sagsen B, Maden M, Cinar S, Kahraman Y. Radiographic Technical Quality of Root Fillings Performed by Dental Students in Turkey. International Endodontic Journal. 2006; 39(11): 867-72.

Pettigrew LK, Jauhar S, Lynch CD, Savarrio L, Carrotte P,Hannigan A. An Audit of the Quality of Root Canal Treatments Performed by Undergraduate Dental Students on Single-Rooted Teeth in Glasgow Dental Hospital and School. The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 2007; 15(2): 72-6.

Balto H, Al Khalifah SH, Al Mugairin S, Al Deeb M, Al-Madi, E.Technical Quality of Root Fillings Performed by Undergraduate Students in Saudi Arabia. International Endodontic Journal, 2010: 43(4), 292-300.

Rafeek RN, Smith WA, Mankee MS, Coldero LG. Radiographic Evaluation of the Technical Quality of Root Canal Fillings Performed by Dental Students. Australian Endodontic Journal. 2012; 38(2): 64-9.

Román Richon S, Faus Matoses V, Alegre Domingo T, Faus Llácer V. Radiographic Technical Quality of Root Canal Treatment Performed Ex Vivo by Dental Students at Valencia University Medical and Dental School, Spain. Medicina Oral, Patología Oral Y Cirugía Bucal. 2014; 93-7.

Smadi L, Hammad M, El-Ma'aita A. Evaluation of the Quality of Root Canal Treatments Performed by Dental Undergraduates: Is There a Need to Review Preclinical Endodontic Courses? American Journal of Educational Research, 2015; 3(12): 1554-8.

Sjögren U, Hägglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors Affecting the Long- Term Results of Endodontic Treatment. Journal of Endodontics. 1990; 16(10): 498-504.

Smith C, Setchell D, Harty F. Factors Influencing the Success of Conventional Root Canal Therapy - a Five-Year Retrospective Study. International Endodontic Journal. 1993; 6(6): 321-33.

Peak J, Hayes S, Bryant S, Dummer P. Endodontics: The Outcome of Root Canal Treatment. A Retrospective Study within the Armed Forces (Royal Air Force). British Dental . 2001; 190(3): 140-4.

Nieuwenhuysen J, Aouar M, D'hoore W. Retreatment or Radiographic Monitoring in Endodontics. International Endodontic Journal. 1994; 27(2): 75-81.

Farzaneh M, Abitbol S, Friedman S. Treatment Outcome in Endodontics: the Toronto Study. Phases I and II: Orthograde Retreatment. Journal of Endodontics. 2004; 30(9): 627-33.

Santos SMC, Soares JA, Costa GM, Brito-Júnior M, Moreira AN, de Magalhães CS. Radiographic Parameters of Quality of Root Canal Fillings and Periapical Status: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Journal of Endodontics. 2010; 36(12): 1932-7.

Bołtacz-Rzepkowska E, Pawlicka H. Radiographic Features and Outcome of Root Canal Treatment Carried out in the Łódz Region of Poland. International Endodontic Journal. 2003; 36(1): 27-32.

Ramachandran Nair P. Non-microbial Etiology: Foreign Body Reaction Maintaining Post-treatment ApicalPeriodontitis. Endodontic Topics, 2003; 6(1): 114-34.

Zhong Y, Chasen J, Yamanaka R, Garcia R, Kaye EK, Kaufman JS, Cai J, Wilcosky T, Trope M, Caplan DJ. 2008.

Extension and Density of Root Fillings and Postoperative Apical Radiolucencies in the Veterans Affairs Dental Longitudinal Study. Journal of Endodontics, 34(7), pp.798-803.

American Association of Endodontists. Glossary of Endodontic Terms. 2016. Available at:http://www .nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/aae/endodonticglossary2016/ [Accessed 28 August 2017].

Schaeffer MA, White RR, Walton RE. Determining the Optimal Obturation Length: A Meta-Analysis of Literature. Journal of Endodontics. 2005; 31(4): 271-4.

Kirkevang LL, Ørstavik D, Hörsted-Bindslev P, Wenzel A. Periapical Status and Quality of Root Fillings and Coronal Restorations in a Danish Population. International Endodontic Journal. 2000; 33(6), 509-15.

Hommez G, Coppens C, De Moor R. Periapical Health Related to the Quality of Coronal Restorations and Root Fillings. International Endodontic Journal. 2002; 35(8): 680-9.

Schilder H. Cleaning and Shaping the Root Canal. The Dental Clinics of North America. 1974; 18: 269-96.

Arvaniti IS, Khabbaz MG. Influence of Root Canal Taper on its Cleanliness: a Scanning Electron Microscopic Study. Journal of Endodontics. 2011; 37(6): 871-4.RESEARCH < 277 www.sada.co.za / SADJ Vol. 76 No. 539. Zogheib C, Naaman A, Medioni E, Arbab-Chirani R. Influence of Apical Taper on the Quality of Thermoplasticized Root Fillings Assessed by Micro-Computed Tomography. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2012; 16(5), 1493-8.

Mostert VC, Jonker CH. An audit of root canal treatments completed by students and dentists at an academic hospital. South African Dental Journal. 2016; 71(4): s170-5.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Patel, E. ., Ehbesh, A. A. M., Munshi, I. E., & Tootla, S. . (2021). Quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate students at the Wits Oral Health Centre. South African Dental Journal, 76(5), 270–278. https://doi.org/10.17159/10.17159/2519-0105/2021/v76no5a5