Should dentists perform independent jaw wiring for weight loss? A principlist analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/sadj.v79i05.18336Keywords:
mandibular, obligationsAbstract
This article presents an ethical analysis for the practice of jaw wiring as an independent weight loss intervention by dentists. The four foundational principles of autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence and justice serve as a framework for evaluating the ethical dimensions of the practice, and whether it can be justified. The ethical analysis of this weight loss procedure requires dentists to
debate the potential benefits with possible harms, while respecting the autonomy and desires of the patient. While patients possess a fundamental right to autonomous decision-making, conceding to their autonomy is not absolute and dentists need to balance their decisions with considerations of beneficence and nonmaleficence. The ethical analysis concludes that dentists who refuse
requests to independently perform jaw wiring for purely weight loss purposes are ethically justified within the principlist framework when the principles of nonmaleficence and beneficence are at stake. The wellbeing and health of the patient, as well as professional obligations, justify their refusal.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Brunton P, Ratnayake J, Bodansky H, Mei L, Veerasamy A, Hall R. An intraoral device for weight loss: initial clinical findings. Br Dent J. 2021:1-6
Khanna D, Welch BS, Rehman A. Pathophysiology of Obesity. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, 2022
Mahmoud R, Kimonis V, Butler MG. Genetics of Obesity in Humans: A Clinical Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(19): 11005
World Health Organization. World Obesity Day 2022 – Accelerating action to stop obesity, 2024
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press, 2013:14
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press, 2001
Falahati S. What is the Scope of Autonomy in Medical Practice? Scott Med J, 2014: 3(1): 37-41
Bhattay-Loonat S, Gardner J, Miniggio HD. Is it ethical to immobilize patient’s jaws for weight loss? A deontological perspective. S Afr Dent J. 2023; 78(3): 160-3
Gillon R. Medical Ethics: Four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ. 1994; 309: 184-188
Beauchamp TL. The Theory, Method, and Practice of Principlism, in John Z Sadler, KWM Fulford, and Werdie (CW) van Staden (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Psychiatric Ethics, 2015
Hartshorne R, van Zyl M. Ethics, professionalism, and communication skills. In Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry. Quintessence Publishing Company, 2020: 17-30
Gardner J. Ethical issues in public health promotion. S Afr J BL. 2014; 7(1): 30-3
Horton R. The vicissitudes of beneficence. Lancet. 2002; 360(9346): S32-3
Savulescu J. Rational non-interventional paternalism: why doctors ought to make judgments of what is best for their patients. J Med Ethics.1995; 21(6): 327-31
De Roubaix JA. Beneficence, non-maleficence, distributive justice and respect for patient autonomy – reconcilable ends in aesthetic surgery? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011; 64(1): 11-16
Reid KI. 2017. Informed consent in dentistry. J Law, Med & Ethics. 2017; 45(1): 77-94
Pausé C, McAllister T, Simpson AB, Graham R, Calloway L, Gillon A, Halcrow S, Jones R, Keene S, LaMarre A, Parker G, Powell D, Santa Maria T, Tohiariki B, Tumilty E, Vandewiele C, Watkins A, Withey-Rila C. Teeth are for chewing: a critical review of the conceptualisation and ethics of a controversial intraoral weight-loss device. Br Dent J. 2021; 231: 675-9
Beauchamp TL. The Principle of Beneficence in Applied Ethics [online]. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2019
Müller S. Body integrity identity disorder (BIID) – is the amputation of healthy limbs ethically justified? Am J Bioeth. 2009; 9(1): 36-43
Nwoga MC, Maduakor SN, Ndukuba AC. Voluntary jaw wiring in Nigeria: Reasons and treatment outcome. In J Health Sci. 2019: 24(1): 28
Summers J. Principles of Healthcare Ethics. In: Morrison, Eileen E, ed. Health Care Ethics: Critical Issues for the 21st Century. 2nd edition. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2009y: 41-58
Garret JR, Baillie HL, Garrett JT. Health care ethics: Principles and problems. Prentice Hall, 1993
Shepard BC, Townsend GC, Goss AN. The oral effects of prolonged intermaxillary fixation by interdental eyelet wiring. International Journal of Oral Surgery. 1982; 11(5): 292-298
Varkey B. 2021. Principles of Clinical Ethics and Their Application to Practice. Medical Principles and Practice. 2021; 30: 17-28
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
.png){kind=spacer}