Empathy and associated influencing factors in occupational therapy students: A cross-sectional study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/2310-3833/2023/vol53n2a4

Keywords:

Interpersonal Reactivity Index, Students' empathy levels, Occupational therapy curriculum and training, Clinical fieldwork, Covid-19 pandemic impact

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Empathy, often described as the comprehension of another person's state of mind, enables one to appreciate social environments and anticipate others' behaviour. In occupational therapy, the therapeutic use of self, which is grounded in empathy, is commonly considered essential, as it enables therapists to manage a therapeutic relationship with clients. However, high caseloads, stressors and pressure to perform often impact empathy levels. This study aimed to determine the empathy levels of undergraduate occupational therapy students, as well as factors affecting empathy levels METHOD: A quantitative approach was used, with an observational, cross-sectional study methodology, employing an electronic survey consisting of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) and a questionnaire developed by the researchers RESULTS: In total, 112 (response rate 70.4%) students participated in the study. Overall, the students had a satisfactory level of empathy. Of concern, however, was the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and the lack of clinical fieldwork experience, which possibly contributed to the lower empathy levels observed among second-and third-year students CONCLUSION: From the findings, it is suggested that more attention should be given to empathy, as it plays an integral role in practice with clients, as well as in the training of occupational therapy students Implications for practice The findings suggest the opportunity for interventions and support systems that can help students manage high caseloads, stressors, and performance pressures, while also fostering and maintaining empathy. Implementing strategies such as stress management programs, mindfulness training, and self-care initiatives can help mitigate the negative impact on empathy levels and promote the development of empathetic skills in future occupational therapists. The research study's results have implications for the professional practice of occupational therapy. It emphasizes the need for ongoing education and training programs that focus on empathy development and maintenance throughout a therapist's career. By providing therapists with the tools, resources, and support to sustain their empathy levels in challenging work environments, the study suggests that the quality of care provided to clients can be enhanced, leading to better therapeutic outcomes and overall client satisfaction. Organizational changes within healthcare settings may be necessary to address workload issues and create a supportive environment that nurtures empathy among occupational therapy professionals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brown B. Brené Brown's Powerful Quotes on Accepting Yourself Whole-Heartedly. Available at: https://themindsjournal.com/brene-browns-powerful-quotes-on-accepting-yourself (accessed 17 February 2022)

Patterson J. Empathy: a concept analysis. International Journal for Human Caring. 2018;22(4):217-223. https://dx.doi.org/10.20467/1091-5710.22.4.217

Jeffrey D. Empathy, sympathy and compassion in healthcare: Is there a problem? Is there a difference? Does it matter? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2016;109(12):446-452. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0141076816680120

Davis MH. Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1983;44(1):113-126. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113

Keaton SA. Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). In: The Sourcebook of Listening Research. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2017, p. 340-347.

Davis MH. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology. 1980;10(85):1-19. Available from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.462.7754 (accessed 17 February 2022).

Batchelder L, Brosnan M, Ashwin C. The development and validation of the Empathy Components Questionnaire (ECQ). PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0169185. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169185

Bosnjakovic J, Radionov T. Empathy: concepts, theories and neuroscientific basis. Journal of Psychiatric Research and Addictions. 2018;54(2):123-150. https://dx.doi.org/10.20471/dec.2018.54.02.04

American Occupational Therapy Association. Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process -Fourth Edition. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2020;74(Suppl 2):1-87. https://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.74S2001

Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, Incorporated; 2020. Available from: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/client; (accessed 18 February 2022).

Adams R. Clinical empathy: a discussion on its benefits for practitioners, students of medicine and patients. Journal of Herbal Medicine. 2012;2(2):52-57. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hermed.2012.04.004

Del Canale S, Louis DZ, Maio V, Wang X, Rossi G, Hojat M, et al. The relationship between physician empathy and disease complications. Academic Medicine. 2012;87(9):1243-1249. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3182628fbf

Derksen F, Olde Hartman TC, van Dijk A, Plouvier A, Bensing J, Lagro-Janssen A. Consequences of the presence and absence of empathy during consultations in primary care: a focus group study with patients. Patient Education and Counseling. 2017;100(5):987-993. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.003

Derksen F, Bensing J, Lagro-Janssen A. Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: a systematic review. British Journal of General Practice. 2013;63(606):e76-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X660814

Quince T, Thiemann P, Benson J, Hyde S. Undergraduate medical students' empathy: current perspectives. Advances in Medical Education and Practice. 2016;7:443-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S76800

World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Education Guidelines 2013: Transforming and scaling up health professionals' education and training. Geneva: WHO; 2013. Available from: https://www.hrhresourcecenter.org/node/5581.html (accessed 18 February 2022).

Riess H. The science of empathy. Journal of Patient Experience. 2017;4(2):74-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373517699267

Fields SK, Mahan P, Tillman P, Harris J, Maxwell K, Hojat M. Measuring empathy in healthcare profession students using the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: health provider - student version. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2011;25(4):287-293. https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2011.566648

Brown T, Williams B, Boyle M, Molloy A, McKenna L, Molloy L, et al. Levels of empathy in undergraduate occupational therapy students. Occupational Therapy International. 2010;17(3):135-141. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oti.297

Colliver JA, Conlee MJ, Verhulst SJ, Dorsey JK. Reports of the decline of empathy during medical education are greatly exaggerated: a reexamination of the research. Academic Medicine. 2010;85(4):588-93. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3181d281dc

Costa P, Magalhäes E, Costa MJ. A latent growth model suggests that empathy of medical students does not decline over time. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2013;18(3):509-522. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9390-z

Roff S. Reconsidering the "decline" of medical student empathy as reported in studies using the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy-Student version (JSPE-S). Medical Teacher. 2015;37(8):783-786. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1009022

Hegazi I, Hennessy A, Wilson I. Empathy levels in medical students: do they really change over time? In: Kondo M (ed.). Empathy - An Evidence-Based Interdisciplinary Perspective. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; 2017. p. 147-170. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.69625 (accessed 18 February 2022).

Yu ML, Brown T, Hewitt A, Cousland R, Licciardi L, Lyons C. Baccalaureate occupational therapy students' development of social and emotional competencies. Nurse Education Today. 2021;105:105032. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105032

Keefe T. Empathy: the critical skill. Social Work. 1976;21(1):10-14. Available from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.949.7766&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 18 February 2022).

Rogers CR. The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology. 1957;21(2):95-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0045357

Hojat M, Gonnella JS. Eleven years of data on the Jefferson Scale of Empathy - Medical Student Version (JSE-S): proxy norm data and tentative cutoff scores. Medical Principles and Practice. 2015;24(4):344-350. https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000381954

Lawrence EJ, Shaw P, Baker D, Baron-Cohen S, David AS. Measuring empathy: reliability and validity of the empathy quotient. Psychological Medicine. 2004;34(5):911-920. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0033291703001624

Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S. The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2004;34(2):163-175. https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/b:jadd.0000022607.19833.00

Neumann DL, Chan RCK, Boyle GJ, Wang Y, Rae Westbury H. Measures of empathy: self-report, behavioral, and neuroscientific approaches. In: Boyle GJ, Saklofske DH, Matthews G (eds.). Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2015, 257-289.

Pierce DE. The sociocultural dimension of occupation. In: Pierce DE (ed.). Occupation by Design: Building Therapeutic Power. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company; 2003, 197-218.

Taylor RR, Van Puymbroeck L. Therapeutic use of self: applying the intentional relationship model in group therapy. In: O'Brien JC, Solomon JW (eds.). Occupational Analysis and Group Process. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2013, 36-52.

Health Professions Council of South African (HPCSA). Conduct and ethics. Ethical guidelines for good practice in health care professions. Available from: https://www.hpcsa.co.za/?contentId=79 (accessed 18 February 2022).

Del Canale S, Louis DZ, Maio V, Wang X, Rossi G, Hojat M, et al. The relationship between physician empathy and disease complications: an empirical study of primary care physicians and their diabetic patients in Parma, Italy. Academic Medicine. 2012;87(9):1243-1249. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3182628fbf

Rauhaus BM, Sibila D, Johnson AF. Addressing the increase of domestic violence and abuse during the COVID-19 pandemic: a need for empathy, care, and social equity in collaborative planning and responses. American Review of Public Administration. 2020;50(6-7):668-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0275074020942079

Pfattheicher S, Nockur L, Böhm R, Sassenrath C, Petersen MB. The emotional path to action: empathy promotes physical distancing and wearing of face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological Science. 2020;31(11):1363-1373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797620964422

Riess H. The impact of clinical empathy on patients and clinicians: understanding empathy's side effects. American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience. 2015;6(3):51-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2015.1052591

Williams B, Brown T, McKenna L, Beovich B, Etherington J. Attachment and empathy in Australian undergraduate paramedic, nursing and occupational therapy students: a cross-sectional study. Collegian. 2017;24(6):603-509. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2016.11.004

Rakel D, Barrett B, Zhang Z, Hoeft T, Chewning B, Marchand L, et al. Perception of empathy in the therapeutic encounter: effects on the common cold. Patient Education and Counseling. 2011;85(3):390-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.009

Pierce DE. You are what you do. In: Pierce DE (ed.). Occupation by Design: Building Therapeutic Power. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company; 2003, 301-309.

Komeda H, Kosaka H, Fujioka T, Jung M, Okazawa H. Do individuals with autism spectrum disorders help other people with autism spectrum disorders? An investigation of empathy and helping motivation in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2019;10:376. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00376

Hojat M, Spandorfer J, Louis DZ, Gonnella JS. Empathic and sympathetic orientations toward patient care: conceptualization, measurement, and psychometrics. Academic Medicine. 2011;86(8):989-995. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e31822203d8

Spreng RN, McKinnon MC, Mar RA, Levine B. The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. Journal of Personality Assessment. 2009;91(1):62-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223890802484381

Konrath S. Critical Synthesis Package: Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). MedEdPORTAL Publ [Internet]. 2013;1-7. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9596

Greene D. Student perceptions of aging and disability as influenced by service learning. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics. 1998;15(3):39-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/J148v15n03_03

Henry-Tillman R, Deloney LA, Savidge M, Graham CJ, Klimberg VS. The medical student as patient navigator as an approach to teaching empathy. American Journal of Surgery. 2002;183(6):659-662. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00867-x

Reynolds WJ, Scott B. Do nurses and other professional helpers normally display much empathy? Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2000;31(1):226-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01242.x

Patel S, Pelletier-Bui A, Smith S, Roberts MB, Kilgannon H, Trzeciak S, et al. Curricula for empathy and compassion training in medical education: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0221412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221412

Downloads

Published

22-08-2023

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Empathy and associated influencing factors in occupational therapy students: A cross-sectional study. (2023). South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53(2), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.17159/2310-3833/2023/vol53n2a4
Views
  • Abstract 150
  • PDF 47