Assessment of participation in collective occupations: Domains and items

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/2310-3833/2023/vol53n2a9

Keywords:

Collective participation, Co-occupation, VdTMoCA, Creative ability, Occupational therapy, Health programmes

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Occupational therapists work with groups of people who engage in collective occupations to have a positive influence on their health and wellbeing. Although the concept of collective occupations is described and defined in occupational science literature, little has been done on specific assessment tools to guide clinicians on how well people are engaging in collective occupations AIM: This article describes the development of an assessment tool to assess participation in collective occupations in a South African context METHOD: A mixed methods approach with a sequential exploratory design was used. Domains and items were generated from a literature review on collective occupations as well as semi-structured interviews with occupational therapy experts in community settings. Data were thematically analysed using a priori coding. The Vona du Toit Model of Creative ability was used to frame the coding. Domains and items emerged from the data RESULTS: The result was the development of five domains and 19 items that could be used to measure and describe collective participation in occupations. Domains include collective's motivation, ability to perform action, ability to form a collective, ability to produce and end product, emotional-cognitive functioning and collective relations Implications for practice: To work with groups of people, clinicians not only need to understand the nature of collective participation but also need to understand why people participate in them. They should also have insight in the abilities needed to effectively participate as a collective. Understanding of a collective's behaviour in the above-mentioned domains, could guide occupational therapists in planning intervention to enhance collective participation in occupations. The levels of collective participation could guide occupational therapists to gain insight into the potential and behaviour of collectives. Such understanding can enable effective intervention-, preventive- and promotive health programmes with collectives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Pierce D, Marshall A. Staging the play: Maternal management of home space and time to acilitate infant/ todller play and development. In: Esdaile S, Olson J, editors. Mothering occupations: Challenge, agency and participation. Philadephia: F A Davis; 2004. p. 73-94.

Pierce D. Co-occupation: The challenges of defining concepts original to occupational Science. Journal. 2009;16(3):203-7 https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2009.9686663.

Hagedorn R. Tools for Practice in Occupational Therapy: A Structured Approach to Core Skills and Processes. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.

Adams F, Casteleijn D. New insights into collective participation: A South African perspective. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2014;44(1):81-7.

Adams F. Development of descriptors for domains and items for collective participation in occupations. Johannesburg, South Africa: University of Witwatersrand; 2016. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10539/21262

Letts L. Health promotion. In: Blesedell Crepeau E, Cohn C, Boyt-Schell B, editors. Willard and Spackman's Occupational Therapy. 11th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. p. 165-80.

African National Congress. A national health plan for South Africa. Pretoria; 1994.

WHO. Declaration of Alma Ata. Alma Ata, USSR1978.

Iwama M. Culturally relevant occupational therapy. London: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2006.

Dickie V, Cutchin M, Humphry R. Occupation as transactional experience: A critiques of individualism in occupational science. Journal. 2006;13(1):83-93 https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2006.9686573.

Cutchin M, Aldrich R, Bailliard A, Coppola S. Action theories of occupational science: The contributions of Dewey and Bourdieu. Journal. 2008;15(3):157-65 https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2008.9686625.

Fisher AG, Marterella A. Powerful Practice: A Model for Authentic Occupational Therapy. Fort Collins, CO: Center for Innovative OT Solutions; 2019.

Becker L, Duncan M. Thinking about groups. In: Becker L, editor. Working with groups. Cape Town: Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 31-51.

Hemphill BJ, Urish CK. Assessments in Occupational Therapy Mental Health: An Integrative Approach. New York: Slack, Incorporated; 2020.

Rifkin SB. Paradigm Lost: Towards a new understanding of community participation in health programmes. Acta Trop. 1996;61:79-92.

Fogelberg D, Frauwirth S. A complexity science approach to occupation: Moving beyond the individual. Journal. 2010;17(3):131-9 https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2010.9686687.

American Occupational Therapy Association. Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process. Journal. 2020;74(7412410010) https://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.74S2001.

Casteleijn D. Using measurement principles to confirm the levels of creative ability as described in the Vona du Toit Model of Creative Ability. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2014;44(1):14-9.

Du Toit V. Patient Volition and Action in Occupational Therapy. Johannesburg: Vona & Marie du Toit Foundation; 2009.

Thomas M, Thomas MJ. Manual for CBR planners. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal. 2003:1-88.

Creswell JW, Klassen AC, Plano Clark VL, Smith KC. Best Practices for Mixed Methods Research in the Health Sciences2011. 541-5 p.

Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). Journal. 1996;29(6):206-8 https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L.

Brereton P, Kitchenham BA, Budgen D, Turner M, Khalil M. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal. 2007;80(4):571-83 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.009.

Pickens ND, Pizur-Barnekow K. Guest editorial. Journal of Occupational Science. 2009;16(3):138-9.

Pickens ND, Pizur-Barnekow K. Co-occupation: Extending the dialogue. Journal. 2009;16(3):151-6 https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2009.9686656.

Price P, Stephenson SM. Learning to promote occupational development through co-occupation. Journal. 2009;16(3):180-6 https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2009.9686660.

Ramugondo E, Kronenberg F. Explaining collective occupations from a human relations perspective: Bridging the individual-collective dichotomy. Journal. 2015;22(1):3-16 https://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2013.781920.

Laliberte Rudman D. Enacting the critical potential of occupational science: Problematizing the 'individualizing of occupation'. Journal. 2013;20(4):298-313 https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2013.803434.

Ramugondo E, Kronenberg F. Collective occupations: A vehicle for building and maintaining work relationships 15th World Congress for the World Federation of Occupational Therapists; Santiago, Chile2010.

Furnham A. Motivation. In: Comer R, Gould E, Furnham A, editors. Psychology. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2013. p. 375-405.

Sherwood W. An investigation into the theorectical construction of effort and maximum effort as a contribution to the theory of creative ability. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand; 2016. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10539/21261

Cambridge Dictionary. Online dictionary: Cambridge University Press; 2020 [13 October 2020]. Available from: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/initiative.

Barlow J, Dennis A. Not as smart as we think: A study of collective intelligence in virtual groups 2014 [Available from: jordanbarlow.flles.wordpress.com/2014/05/barlow-dennis-2014-ci-abstract.pdf.

Howe C, Schwartzberg S. A functional approach to group work in occupational therapy. . 3rd ed. Philadephia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.

Johnson J, Pulsipher D, Ferrin S, Burlingame G, Davies D, Gleave R. Measuring group processes: A comparison of the GCQ and CCI. Journal. 2006;10(2):136-45 https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.10.2.136.

Yalom I. The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books; 1995.

Downloads

Published

22-08-2023

How to Cite

Adams, F., & Casteleijn, D. (2023). Assessment of participation in collective occupations: Domains and items. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53(2), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.17159/2310-3833/2023/vol53n2a9

Issue

Section

Research Articles