• March 2018
    No 63 (2018)
  • December 2017
    No 62 (2017)

    This issue of South African Crime Quarterly is a special issue focusing on protest. It is guest edited by Kelley Moult of the Centre for Law and Society at the University of Cape Town.

    Articles in this edition illustrate the ways that academics, activists, lawyers and practitioners are engaging with questions of protest and response. Two articles address the law on protest. Chamberlain and Snyman survey the protest landscape through the lens of the public interest legal sector, and question, through the experience of Right2Protest, the ways in which court processes are being used as tools with which to quash protest activities. Omar uses the Social Justice Coalition’s challenge to the Regulation of Gatherings Act (RGA) to highlight the controversies around the Act’s regulatory provisions.

    Two articles focus on protest related to the right to basic education. Ally argues that the current legal framework on protest fails to protect and enable children’s right to protest, and uses the case of Mlungwana and Others v State and Others to show how the criminalisation of peaceful protest not only violates the state’s responsibility but also fails to take into account the best interests of children. Focusing on the South African Schools Act, Skelton and Nsibirwa show tensions between the right to protest and to basic education. Problematizing the implementation if provisions that create criminal accountability in the context of protest (including parents’ decisions to keep children out of school), they argue that holding protesters accountable under criminal law may be desirable, but that the proposed amendments to the Schools Act do not resolve these practical tensions.

    Mukumba and Abdullah use a series of Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA) requests to municipalities to test how easily accessible information is on where and how to submit a notice of gathering, as required by the RGA. They show that information is scarce, and compliance uneven across the country, finding that this amounts to active resistance by government to enabling the right to protest.

    Two research articles look at public opinion on protest. Roberts et al., examine views of police performance in dealing with protests, finding that this is negative on the whole, and that roughly a third of South Africans feel that the police are never justified in using force in these situations. Bohler-Muller et al., focus on patterns of support for different forms of protest action across various socio-demographic and geographic variables. Surprisingly, the authors find no considerable differences across age, gender, race and class in the public’s support for protest, although people are more likely to support protest if they think it will be successful.

    The case note by Abdool Karim and Kruyer analyses Rhodes University v Student Representative Council of Rhodes University, and Bond reviews Jane Duncan’s The rise of the securocrats and Protest nation.

     

  • September
    No 61 (2017)
  • June 2017
    No 60 (2017)
    Special issue on organised environmental crime funded by the Global Initiative.
  • March 2017
    No 59 (2017)
  • June 2002
    No 1 (2002)
  • November 2002
    No 2 (2002)
  • March 2003
    No 3 (2003)
  • June 2003
    No 4 (2003)
  • September 2003
    No 5 (2003)
  • December 2003
    No 6 (2003)
  • March 2004
    No 7 (2004)
  • June 2004
    No 8 (2004)
  • September 2004
    No 9 (2004)
  • December 2004
    No 10 (2004)
  • March 2005
    No 11 (2005)
  • June 2005
    No 12 (2005)
  • September 2005
    No 13 (2005)
  • December 2005
    No 14 (2005)
  • March 2006
    No 15 (2006)
  • June 2006
    No 16 (2006)
  • September 2006
    No 17 (2006)
  • December 2006
    No 18 (2006)
  • March 2007
    No 19 (2007)
  • June 2007
    No 20 (2007)
  • September 2007
    No 21 (2007)
  • December 2007
    No 22 (2007)
  • March 2008
    No 23 (2008)
  • June 2008
    No 24 (2008)
  • September 2008
    No 25 (2008)
  • December 2008
    No 26 (2008)
  • March 2009
    No 27 (2009)
  • June 2009
    No 28 (2009)
  • September 2009
    No 29 (2009)
  • December 2009
    No 30 (2009)
  • March 2010
    No 31 (2010)
  • June 2010
    No 32 (2010)
  • September 2010
    No 33 (2010)
  • December 2010
    No 34 (2010)
  • March 2011
    No 35 (2011)
  • July 2011
    No 36 (2011)
  • September 2011
    No 37 (2011)
  • December 2011
    No 38 (2011)
  • March 2012
    No 39 (2012)
  • June 2012
    No 40 (2012)
  • September 2012
    No 41 (2012)
  • December 2012
    No 42 (2012)
  • April 2013
    No 43 (2013)
  • June 2013
    No 44 (2013)
  • September 2013
    No 45 (2013)
  • December 2013
    No 46 (2013)
  • March 2014
    No 47 (2014)
  • June 2014
    No 48 (2014)
  • September 2014
    No 49 (2014)
  • December 2014
    No 50 (2014)
  • March 2015
    No 51 (2015)
  • Special edition: Is social cohesion the missing link in overcoming violence, inequality and poverty?
    No 55 (2016)

    The March 2016 edition of South African Crime Quarterly is a special edition dedicated to exploring the role of social cohesion and collective efficacy in addressing violence in cities in the global south.

    Social cohesion is a broad concept but generally refers to the factors that ‘hold a society together’. Collective efficacy looks at how these ties can prevent violence when they are translated into collective action at the neighbourhood level.

    Rapid urbanisation in the developing world is thought to exacerbate and concentrate the linkages between poverty, inequality and violence in rapidly expanding cities. It has been hypothesised that weak social cohesion increases the risk that violence will occur, while strong social cohesion can act as a protective factor preventing violence. Thus far, however, there has been little empirical research on social cohesion and its relationship to violence in the global south.

    This edition will include articles that present research findings on these issues. It locates itself within a growing body of intellectual and policy engagement on safety in rapidly growing cities in the global south. The deadline for abstracts has passed. The deadline for articles to be considered for publication is 15 November 2015.

  • June 2016 edition
    No 56 (2016)
  • September 2016
    No 57 (2016)
  • December 2016
    No 58 (2016)
1 - 25 of 63 items