Access for success: Exploring affordances theory in a new hybrid model teacher education programme
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/smfjhx40Keywords:
access, success, affordances, hybrid model, teacher educationAbstract
Situated within the ambit of Affordances Theory, this paper reports on an empirical and descriptive investigation into a newly introduced hybrid-model teacher education programme in a developing context. The purpose of the study was to examine the extent to which the first two student cohorts availed themselves of the ICT affordances provided by the institution, which could favourably compare to those found in a developed context. The study adopted the sequential explanatory mixed-methods research design. This study involved two phases in which the quantitative data were first collected through surveys, followed by the collection of qualitative data that involved individual interviews, focus group discussions and documents. The participants included students, online tutors and an instructional designer. Findings from both cohorts show students rarely participated online due to diverse reasons, which included limited access to the internet, the cost of bandwidth, technophobia, and inadequate online and academic support. The findings reaffirmed the interdependent relationship between both individuals and the affordances that exist in an environment. If institutions paid adequate attention to the findings, it would help to stem the tide of poor retention rates in this mode of delivery. Further recommendations for research and practice include the need for institutions to provide relevant technology affordances, adequate and relevant student support, and ongoing monitoring of the quality of their programmes to encourage access for success.
References
Aluko, F.R. (2015) Throughput rates in ODL: Understanding the revolving door syndrome. In M. Letseka (Ed.) Open Distance Learning (ODL) in South Africa. New York: Nova Publishers, pp. 77-90.
Leadership within the Ambit of Ubuntu. Submitted to International Journal of African Higher Education for review on 11 September 2020; conditionally accepted on 19 February 2021.
Bankole, O. & Venter, I. (2017) Insights into the use and affordances of social and collaborative applications for student projects. South African Computer Journal 29(2) pp.1-15, https://doi.org/10.18489/sacj. v29i2.470
Blewett, C. & Hugo, W. (2016) Actant affordances: a brief history of affordance theory and a Latourian extension for education technology research. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning 4(1) pp. 55-73. doi.org/10.14426/cristal.v4i1.50
Center for Research and Innovation in Teaching. (n.d) Choosing a mixed-methods design. https://cirt. gcu.edu/research/developmentresources/research_ready/mixed_methods/choosing_design (Accessed 3 August 2020).
Chemero, A.A. (2003) An outline of a Theory of Affordances. Ecological Psychology 15(2) pp.181-195, doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5
Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET). (2014) Policy for the Provision of Distance Education in South African Universities. Pretoria: Department of Higher Education and Training. https://www.saide. org.za/documents/Distance_education_policy.pdf (Accessed 3 August 2020).
Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET). (2015) Revised Policy on the Minimum Requirements for Teacher Education Qualifications. Pretoria: Government Printer.
Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET). (2018) Statistics on Post-School Education and Training in South Africa: 2016. http://www.dhet.gov.za/Research%20Coordination%20Monitoring%20 and%20Evaluation/6_DHET%20Stats%20Report_04%20April%202018.pdf (Accessed 3 August 2020).
Dlamini, R. & Coleman, E. (2017) Guest editorial: ICT in Education. South African Computer Journal 29(2) pp.vii-x. http://dx.doi.org/10.18489/sacj.v29i2.547
Etikan, I., Musa, S.A. & Alkassim, R.S. (2016) Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics 5(1) pp.1-4, doi.org/ 10.11648/j. ajtas.20160501.11
Fourie, G.S. (2019) Distance Education Discussion Board Analysis. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.
Gaver, W.W. (1991) Technology affordances. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. New York: ACM Press, pp.79-84..
Gibson, J.J. (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Holmberg, B. (2001) Distance education in essence. Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany: Bibliotheksund Informations system der Universitat Oldenburg.
Holmes, K.A. & Prieto-Rodriguez, E. (2018) Student and Staff Perceptions of a Learning Management System for Blended Learning in Teacher Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education 43(3) pp. 21-34. http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol43/iss3/2 (Accessed 5 August 2020).
Ingold, T. (2018) Rejoinder: Back to the future with the theory of affordances. Journal of Ethnographic Theory 8(1/2) pp.39-44. https://doi.org/10.1086/698358
Kemp, S. (2018) Digital in 2018: World’s internet users pass the 4 billion mark. https://wearesocial. com/uk/blog/2018/01/global-digital-report-2018 (Accessed 5 August 2020).
Kordt, B. (2018) Affordance theory and multiple language learning and teaching. International Journal of Multilingualism 15(2) pp.135-148.
Kruss, G., McGrath, S., Petersen, I. & Gastrow, M. (2015) Higher education and economic development: The importance of building technological capabilities. International Journal of Educational Development 43 pp.22-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev
Lewin, T. & Mawoyo, M. (2014) Student access and success: issues and interventions in South African Universities. Inyathelo: The South African Institute for Advancement.
Mao, J. (2014) Social media for learning: A mixed methods study on high school students’ technology affordances and perspectives. Computers in Human Behaviour 33 pp.213-223. doi.org/10.1016/j. chb.2014.01.002
Markus, M.L. & Silver, M.S. (2008) A foundation for the study of IT effects: A new look at DeSanctis and Poole’s Concepts of Structural Features and Spirit. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9 pp.609-632.
McGrenere, J. & Ho, W. (2000) Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept. Paper presented at the Graphics Interface, Montreal, Canada, 15-17 May.
Mollar, T. & Cuthbert, D. (2015) The issue of research graduate employability in Australia: An analysis of the policy framing (1999-2003). The Australian Educational Researcher 42(2) pp.237-256.
Mortensen, D.H. (2020) How to do a thematic analysis of user interviews. https://www.interaction-design.org (Accessed 8 August 2020).
My BroadBand. (2018) Internet penetration in South Africa. https://mybroadband.co.za/news/broadband/247702-internet-penetration-in-south-africa.html (Accessed 8 August 2020).
Norman, D.A. (1991) Cognitive artifacts. Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface 1(1) pp.17-38.
Norman, D.A. (1999) Affordance, conventions, and design. interactions 6(3) pp.38-43.
Norman, D.A. (2002) The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
Pozzi, G., Pigni, F. & Vitari. F. (2014) Affordance Theory in the IS discipline: a review and synthesis of the literature. In AMCIS 2014 Proceedings, 2014, Savannah, United States. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes. fr/halshs-01923663
Smale M.A. & Regalado M. (2017) Recommendations for technology in higher education. In M. Smale & M. Regalado (Eds.), Digital technology as affordance and barrier in higher education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp.73-88.
Tait, A. (2015) Student success in open, distance and e-learning. The ICDE reports series pp.1-10.
Tinto, V. (1975) Dropout from Higher Education: A Theoretical Synthesis of Recent Research. Review of Educational Research 45(1) pp.89-125, https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00346543045001089
Tomlinson, M. (2018) Conceptions of the value of higher education in a measured market. Higher Education, 75 pp.711-727, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0165-6
Voigt, L. & Hundrieser, J. (2008) Student success, retention, and graduation: Definitions, theories, practices, patterns, and trends. Noel-Lewitz Retention Codifications November (1) pp.22-1.
Volkoff, O. & Strong, D.M. (2013) Critical realism and affordances: Theorizing IT-associated organizational change processes. MIS quarterly pp.819-834.
Wang, H.F., Wang, J.L. & Tang, Q.H. (2018) A Review of Application of Affordance Theory in Information Systems. Journal of Service Science and Management 11(1) pp.56-70. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2018.111006
World access to higher education day. (2019) World Access to Higher Education Day 2018. https://worldaccesshe.com/ (Accessed 8 August 2020).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.