Visual recognition difficulties: Identifying primary school students' directional confusion in writing letters and numbers

Authors

  • Janet Richmond Edith Cowan University
  • Myra Taylor Edith Cowan University

Abstract

Background: Occupational therapists often assess primary school learners for letter and number reversal tendencies using scales which require recognition of reversed letters and numbers; however, these scales do not generally look at learners' written production of letters and numbers to measure their reversal tendencies.  This study aimed to determine whether learners reverse the same letters and numbers in reading and in writing.

Method: This study utilised the Richmond Reversal Rating (RRR) Scale to identify which language symbols 118 primary school learners found difficult to recognise as being reversed when reading a series of letters and numbers and writing 20 letters and nine numerals. 

Analysis: Nonparametric correlations and parametric Chi-square statistics were used to investigate differences in the learners' reading recognition and written production.

Results: Letters and numbers reversed in recognition (reading) and writing were similar. Moreover, eleven letters and three numbers were identified as difficult to orientate on a page.

Conclusion: Explicit teaching to remediate letter and number reversals and font use are paramount to improving language symbol orientation.   

 

Key Words: Written production, reading recognition, letter and number reversals, primary school learners

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Janet Richmond, Edith Cowan University
    Qulifications: PhD Position: Lecturer, Dept of Occupational Therapy, School of Exercise and Helath Sciences, Edith Cowean University
  • Myra Taylor, Edith Cowan University

    Qualifications: PhD

    Research Fellow

Downloads

Published

24-01-2015

How to Cite

Visual recognition difficulties: Identifying primary school students’ directional confusion in writing letters and numbers. (2015). South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44(3), 2-6. https://journals.assaf.org.za/index.php/sajot/article/view/19668
Views
  • Abstract 2
  • PDF 2
  • Cover letter 2
  • Title Page 2
  • Multiple choice questions 2
  • manuscript - deidentified 2